Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. It is harder to find "diamonds in the rough" now then it was 10 years ago. There are far more camps and recruiting services then there used to be.
Depends on what position coach the player is learning from
I have confidence in some and less confidence in the others.
My speculation is, people were kinda expecting Iowa to be able to draw more players that don't need as much "coaching up" I think people were hoping/expecting the new facilities would help alot and thought with KF saying he was going to pay alot more attention to the finer details that they wouldn't be forced to rely on so many players that are years away from making significant positive contributions. This team needs physically ready players at alot of positions. Most want Iowa to attempt to regain some form of national relevance again. With a depleted roster,adding alot of undeveloped "raw" players that need alot of coaching is not going to get them to that goal in the near future. How many years has it been since Iowa finished in the top 20? How many more years without a top 20 finish will it take before a decision on Kf's future is finalized?As you look at the 2016 class as of today...are you saying that many of those kids don't have the raw talent to be "coached up"? I just don't find that plauseable taking into account Iowa's history of doing just that.
Lack of expirience coaching a certain position- Woods.What is your confidence based off of, Sig? Just curious.
I think there are some very good players on the defensive side of the ball and Toks looks very good at RB and I like the tape of the WR Darby. The biggest problem has been retention and lack of skill position players not player development. When other Big Ten teams are trotting out Coleman, Abdullah, Gordon, Cobb etc and Iowa is going with Weismann and Canzeri that is a big problem. With the type of offense they run they have to have guys at RB and WR who have a lot of big play potential to make it work well. Otherwise you just have an offense like we have seen that gets 3-4 yards per carry, a couple 7 yard catches, gets a few first downs and then punts.
It's nice to see that there are a few people on here who understand what's going on.
Great articles out there on attrition if people are willing to read and learn.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. If you STAY all 4 or 5 years and don't get hurt, you'll have a great chance to at least get a look from the NFL no matter how many stars you have!
example: The 2010 class. They signed 22 kids that year. 9 left or had some sort of career ending injury. Leaving 13. Of those 13, nine of them were either drafted or got a look as an undrafted free agent. 9 of 13! 70%! Now that is development my friends. And if more kids would have stayed, it wouldn't have hurt that percentage because it was guys like Coker, Derby, etc...
The question everyone should be asking is not how we improve recruiting, but how do we improve retention. I guaranty you that's the focus of this current recruiting cycle. kids that want to be hawks AND that the coaches believe will STA
Of those 10, only 1 - Trinca-Pasat - would have committed at this point in the recruiting season. IMO, the single factor that distinguishes this class from any other is the fact that we have a nearly full class before the end of June.....before any of these guys have played a single game of their senior season. We have no idea whatsoever what solid senior seasons would bring to these guys, as far as offers.....but it seems reasonable to believe that some would come. We're simply dealing with a strategy that we've never seen before, and nobody - if we're being honest - knows how its going to play out. At this stage, it really boils down to whether someone trusts the staff's ability to evaluate talent.You make a good point about attrition. However, of the 13 players that stayed from that class, 10 of them had other power 5 conference offers coming out of high school. Most had pretty good power 5 offers. Do you think we will be able to say the same about this class where the majority don't have power 5 offers and the ones that do are mostly from places like Iowa State, Indiana, Syracuse, etc? I know there are some like Toks that have some good offers but guys like that in this class have been few and far between.
The NFL didn't look at how many Power5 offers they had when they invited them to camp. It's irrelevant. Are you trying to tell me the difference between someone developing into NFL material is determined by whether Mich St. offered a kid that went to Iowa? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? A players work ethic and how much he grows mentally and physically will determine whether the become NFL material, not who offered. Iowa brings in kids that they TOTALLY believe can become outstanding players in 3-4 yrs. Everyone of them, or they wouldn't recruit them. But the have to stay and stay healthy for 4-5 yrs.!!! Period.You make a good point about attrition. However, of the 13 players that stayed from that class, 10 of them had other power 5 conference offers coming out of high school. Most had pretty good power 5 offers. Do you think we will be able to say the same about this class where the majority don't have power 5 offers and the ones that do are mostly from places like Iowa State, Indiana, Syracuse, etc? I know there are some like Toks that have some good offers but guys like that in this class have been few and far between.
Of those 10, only 1 - Trinca-Pasat - would have committed at this point in the recruiting season. IMO, the single factor that distinguishes this class from any other is the fact that we have a nearly full class before the end of June.....before any of these guys have played a single game of their senior season. We have no idea whatsoever what solid senior seasons would bring to these guys, as far as offers.....but it seems reasonable to believe that some would come. We're simply dealing with a strategy that we've never seen before, and nobody - if we're being honest - knows how its going to play out. At this stage, it really boils down to whether someone trusts the staff's ability to evaluate talent.
The NFL didn't look at how many Power5 offers they had when they invited them to camp. It's irrelevant. Are you trying to tell me the difference between someone developing into NFL material is determined by whether Mich St. offered a kid that went to Iowa? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? A players work ethic and how much he grows mentally and physically will determine whether the become NFL material, not who offered. Iowa brings in kids that they TOTALLY believe can become outstanding players in 3-4 yrs. Everyone of them, or they wouldn't recruit them. But the have to stay and stay healthy for 4-5 yrs.!!! Period.
Yep, my bad. Honestly, I think I was distracted by how late some of those guys committed! Which, of course, stresses the fan base in a whole different way!! This whole early strategy is very hard to get our collective heads around, I think. But a couple of things I'm encouraged by are: 1) just the simple fact that the staff made a strategic decision to really shake things up (how often have we said that??) and 2) on the heels of a very disappointing season they seem to have created some positive energy. We have recruits talking about being a part of getting things back on track, competing for championships, etc. IMO, that's not insignificant stuff.I think you missed a couple (Morris and Hardy) but still a good point. I might be jumping the gun a bit on the kinds of offers these kids have, but my point remains that at the end of the day you generally want to have guys that were coveted by other good programs. I don't mean that as a blanket statement, there will always be outliers.
Who cares how many players get drafted? Auburn has won a hell of a lot more games including an NC the we have. I'll coach-up 4 and 5 star players and beat your 2 an 3's.Since 2007, in fact, Iowa has had more 3-star recruits (or worse) drafted than Auburn has had players drafted, period.
That is development my friend!
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...loped-most-nfl-draft-picks-over-last-10-years
The NFL didn't look at how many Power5 offers they had when they invited them to camp. It's irrelevant. Are you trying to tell me the difference between someone developing into NFL material is determined by whether Mich St. offered a kid that went to Iowa? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? A players work ethic and how much he grows mentally and physically will determine whether the become NFL material, not who offered. Iowa brings in kids that they TOTALLY believe can become outstanding players in 3-4 yrs. Everyone of them, or they wouldn't recruit them. But the have to stay and stay healthy for 4-5 yrs.!!! Period.
I think this will be a great class provided they all play as seniors. With our program it's all about retention.....
You can't win Championships in college football without big time QB play. This is what has been missing at IowaIt would be nice if the number of Iowa players making it to the NFL relative to other programs was somehow translating to wins on the field. For whatever reason that doesn't seem to be happening as one might expect.