Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed for the most part. But Dochterman's football acumen actually isn't too bad. I'd listen to him over the rest of those guys.Remind me again of Scott Dochtermans FB resume.
Reporters on the whole never played sports at a high level.
He's much better than Rob Biden and Tommy Jock SniffsAgreed for the most part. But Dochterman's football acumen actually isn't too bad. I'd listen to him over the rest of those guys
But football board posters know their stuff!
And DeJong was out at RT because Dunker was out again.KF has been working with the OL this spring; maybe it's paying dividends.
Check this out & watch:
Eyeballs don't lie!But football board posters know their stuff!
Kirk has been doing that for years. I watched TalkNHawks with the Vandenbergs last year when Cade was interviewed. He said, he loved watching Kirk coach the O-line. He said how intense it was.KF has been working with the OL this spring; maybe it's paying dividends.
Check this out & watch:
Eyeballs don't lie!
Can "good" schemes make a bad OL look average? Even if Iowa WR's are marginally better is that enough to prevent 7 or 8 or even 9 man fronts from opposing defenses? Will they be able to open holes in the run game? That is the concern I have, seeing opponents loading up the box as they have in the recent pass.Good schemes can make average OL look great. There’s not a single OL that played for Kansas the last few years with a better recruiting profile than all of our OL (except DeJong), but that line opened up massive holes for an incredible offense.
Sometimes, it IS the X’s & O’s.
This is where RPO’s and extensive motion are handy. You force the defense to tip their hand, isolate the defender that’s in conflict, and make a fairly simple read to decide run/pass.Can "good" schemes make a bad OL look average? Even if Iowa WR's are marginally better is that enough to prevent 7 or 8 or even 9 man fronts from opposing defenses? Will they be able to open holes in the run game? That is the concern I have, seeing opponents loading up the box as they have in the recent pass.
Maybe Iowa will go away from the zone blocking scheme and get some bodies on bodies and maybe improve the OL to a point that opponents have to play "honest". I guess we'll see come fall.
Agreed!! Iowa has made an already tough position to play much more difficult up front. That’s probably one of the biggest things I’m looking for and excited the most about is seeing how we can help our OL out.This is where RPO’s and extensive motion are handy. You force the defense to tip their hand, isolate the defender that’s in conflict, and make a fairly simple read to decide run/pass.
The fact that it confuses OUR defense should not be taken lightly. Our entire ethos is built around preventing the big play and always being in position to limit the space an offense can operate in.
We’re going away from an offense of “You guys figure it out and make all the reads and if our 5 OL can’t block a 6-man pressure than that’s their fault.” to a specific scheme with a specific purpose that has much more direction and lessens the mental load of our players considerably. I trust Lester about 2500% more than BF to figure out how to beat a loaded box.
Which I really like. Lester against Phil. Iron sharpens iron.This is where RPO’s and extensive motion are handy. You force the defense to tip their hand, isolate the defender that’s in conflict, and make a fairly simple read to decide run/pass.
The fact that it confuses OUR defense should not be taken lightly. Our entire ethos is built around preventing the big play and always being in position to limit the space an offense can operate in.
We’re going away from an offense of “You guys figure it out and make all the reads and if our 5 OL can’t block a 6-man pressure than that’s their fault.” to a specific scheme with a specific purpose that has much more direction and lessens the mental load of our players considerably. I trust Lester about 2500% more than BF to figure out how to beat a loaded box.
Eyeballs don't lie and also, stats don't lie. Offense is easy to measure---points or lack of points scored in case of Iowa offense.Eyeballs don't lie!
Excellent synopsis!!!Eyeballs don't lie and also, stats don't lie. Offense is easy to measure---points or lack of points scored in case of Iowa offense.
Casual fans were able to see we had a fat QB with mobility and accuracy issues, turnstiles on OL, and slower/smallish/lessor athletes at WR with bad hands. The entire offensive scheme was not creative. The guy that oversaw/managed the chit show got fired and the CEO of the program took a dent to his reputation as OL guru. New year, offense has new managements, but still needs a talent infusion. Still lacking quality talent/depth at OT.
🙄Yes they do…. Especially if it’s a negative take 🤓
I'll take looking better against a high school defense. The high last year of 41 points was against a team that gave up an average of 32 per game. The next highest of 24 came against a defense giving up 34.6. (I'm not counting the 26 against MSU for coop reasons)They certainly could be better. But I'll believe it when I see it on the field in an actual game against a competent opposing D.
Can "good" schemes make a bad OL look average? Even if Iowa WR's are marginally better is that enough to prevent 7 or 8 or even 9 man fronts from opposing defenses? Will they be able to open holes in the run game? That is the concern I have, seeing opponents loading up the box as they have in the recent pass.
Maybe Iowa will go away from the zone blocking scheme and get some bodies on bodies and maybe improve the OL to a point that opponents have to play "honest". I guess we'll see come fall.