Which of these foreign policy adventures would you say represent wins for America as opposed to losses?
I know this will be hard for Lone Clone because he needs to have every step and term spelled out for him, but for the rest of you, decide for yourself what count as a win or a loss.
I'll give you a some examples. To me, Obama handled Syria wrong. Pretty much everything about it. Not only was it handled wrong but the outcomes (so far) have sucked. Unless you believe that the declining US empire is simply trying to create massive chaos in that region, this is a loss.
Ukraine is tricky. I opposed (and still oppose) the policy, but since it looks like we will end up having moved three quarters of Ukraine into the Western sphere of influence and have isolated and hurt Russia economically, it has to count as a pretty big win.
Or take Libya. At the time I was lukewarm and frankly puzzled by this one. It certainly didn't seem necessary, and hardly seemed worth doing. We were obviously doing it mainly at the behest of our European allies (who sought to gain control of the oil). And Obama conducted it with minimal risk to Americans. So it sounds like a win. But Europe dropped the ball when we finished our part. Now the extremists are running wild and Europe faces a serious and tragic refugee problem. Not our fault, except that our part of the operation paved the way. So I'd call it a loss, overall. But if you only look at our part, it's probably a win.
You won't necessarily agree with my takes, but maybe that will help you shape your own views.
I know this will be hard for Lone Clone because he needs to have every step and term spelled out for him, but for the rest of you, decide for yourself what count as a win or a loss.
I'll give you a some examples. To me, Obama handled Syria wrong. Pretty much everything about it. Not only was it handled wrong but the outcomes (so far) have sucked. Unless you believe that the declining US empire is simply trying to create massive chaos in that region, this is a loss.
Ukraine is tricky. I opposed (and still oppose) the policy, but since it looks like we will end up having moved three quarters of Ukraine into the Western sphere of influence and have isolated and hurt Russia economically, it has to count as a pretty big win.
Or take Libya. At the time I was lukewarm and frankly puzzled by this one. It certainly didn't seem necessary, and hardly seemed worth doing. We were obviously doing it mainly at the behest of our European allies (who sought to gain control of the oil). And Obama conducted it with minimal risk to Americans. So it sounds like a win. But Europe dropped the ball when we finished our part. Now the extremists are running wild and Europe faces a serious and tragic refugee problem. Not our fault, except that our part of the operation paved the way. So I'd call it a loss, overall. But if you only look at our part, it's probably a win.
You won't necessarily agree with my takes, but maybe that will help you shape your own views.