tied it up in the 2nd Q.
Would you feel more comfortable with Iowa's chances in this scenario or if it were 0-0?
Don't lie
Would you feel more comfortable with Iowa's chances in this scenario or if it were 0-0?
Don't lie
14-14, Mizzou just
- Thread starter eyesofhawk
- Start date
Now that it's 21-14 ...
At least a 31.25% chance.Now that it's 21-14 ...
I’d take the team that shows it can score and move the ball. How did those iowa teams that couldn’t fall forward for yards do vs ranked teams the last few years?
Notice how nobody replied until Iowa took the lead?
I want Iowa to win.
But if this second half plays similar to the first and Iowa loses 38-35 or something like that, I will be happier than I would be with Iowa winning 10-7 with 5 first downs and Missouri just effing up a lot and handing them the game.
During the regular season I would rather have the win, but in this exhibition game I am having a lot of fun seeing this.
OMG!
Is this for real?
Just wow!
Bookmark this one boys. Couldn't sum up this board better.
Holy shit!!!!!!
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂hahahahah🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣hahahahahahahahah 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hey pal, I don’t go here often, actually never, but go **** yourself.
You are a condescending prick.
If they just would have put as much emphasis on defense as they did offense during practice.
Son of a
Son of a
You know, this is all because Iowa scored 21 in the first half. Made Missouri be more aggressive and try to score. Should have handed off every play, punted 8 times, and lost 14-10.
Book of Eyes, Chapter One, verse 8
Book of Eyes, Chapter One, verse 8
Well we did score a lot fewer points in the second half, so at least Eyes was happy about that.
I assume that’s a reference about the betting thread from a few days ago. 😂
Damn, I love your sense of humor!
YES! Eyes actually believes that Rutgers would beat KSU at least 3,125 times out of 10,000, can you freaking believe that?!
Well, of course you can, it’s eyes after all.
You are a terrible example for kids.
And have all the makings capable of ruining sports
Actually, it’s the third thing after catching the ball and route running.
Well, 14-14 proved not to be a very comfortable place.
You impose your will much easier through a defense than you do an offense.
Personally, I never had one doubt Iowa would win the Nebraska game
It doesn't matter at all, because scoring points automatically triggers captain dumbass into run-the-clock-down mode for the rest of the game.
He thinks the offense is to Blame for our defensive struggles
Liar
You ask people to be honest in your opening post then post this gem.
How much money have you lost this bowl season but claimed that you really won?
When we settled (once again) for the FG when we had a first down at the ten and parlayed that into a field goal from the twenty, I knew those four points would come back to bite us. Seen it all too many times in the past.
All started by another mishandled snap, which we had 4 weeks to prepare for.
Insane to have the mindset that the best chance for Iowa to win is for the score to be 0-0
Cause it means the defense is keeping up their end…..and the offense gets let off the hook
Winning 10-7 with 0% 3rd down conversions can beat joke bigwest programs
If the offense played that way against Missouri, it would have been 45-0
I don’t think it’s ever going to happen under Kirk, but in order to do well in the new conference alignment the offense is going to have to do much much better
And they were yesterday for the first half! It was when they got 10 point lead that the Kirk playbook came out and blew it.
Cause it means the defense is keeping up their end…..and the offense gets let off the hook
Winning 10-7 with 0% 3rd down conversions can beat joke bigwest programs
If the offense played that way against Missouri, it would have been 45-0
I don’t think it’s ever going to happen under Kirk, but in order to do well in the new conference alignment the offense is going to have to do much much better
And they were yesterday for the first half! It was when they got 10 point lead that the Kirk playbook came out and blew it.
I’m surprised he hasn’t tried to tell us Iowa actually won even though they lost.
The most precious thing about all of this is that right now he’s reading all of these responses and seriously thinking that he owns all of us.
This is the same self-proclaimed expert who derided anyone not impressed with his deep statistical prowess as having below 3rd grade math skills. Yet you can damn well bet that he’s willing to die on this 0-0 hill. When numbers show that the worst offensive team in FBS has averaged 1.4 wins a season for the past quarter century. When Iowa has clearly been a (spectacular, really) statistical anomaly for several years now. No place he’d rather be at the half than sitting on that goose egg. That’s the play of a truly savvy numbers guy. A guy who knows the terminology. L-o-freaking-l.
This right here sums it all up. He attributed Lester trying to implement a new offense as a net negative for the entire team, especially for our defense. Just insane stuff.
