34% shooting was second worst

[SotaHawk87]

amongst winners of the "second" round right ahead of Wisconsin who scored 47.. If Iowa takes care of the ball like they did yesterday and can find a way to 40-42% they'll have a good chance IMO.. I'm hoping Villanova doesn't catch fire the same way Gonzaga did last year!

 

[slipHawk]

amongst winners of the "second" round right ahead of Wisconsin who scored 47.. If Iowa takes care of the ball like they did yesterday and can find a way to 40-42% they'll have a good chance IMO.. I'm hoping Villanova doesn't catch fire the same way Gonzaga did last year!

Yeah let's catch some lightning in a bottle baby!

 

[markfromj]

Please note: The NCAA went back this year to calling Thurs/Fri the "first" round.

 

[slipHawk]

Please note: The NCAA went back this year to calling Thurs/Fri the "first" round.

The First Four seems completely pointless to me still. Just pick them sheesh.

 

[SotaHawk87]

Please note: The NCAA went back this year to calling Thurs/Fri the "first" round.

Best news I've heard yet!

 

[luvmyhawks]

The First Four seems completely pointless to me still. Just pick them sheesh.

True. However, it does give us an extra trip to the tourney.

 

[And1Hawk]

amongst winners of the "second" round right ahead of Wisconsin who scored 47.. If Iowa takes care of the ball like they did yesterday and can find a way to 40-42% they'll have a good chance IMO.. I'm hoping Villanova doesn't catch fire the same way Gonzaga did last year!

Never complain about winning. We could have shot 55% and lost. We missed 8 layups so factor that into shooting percentages as well.

Nova is a lot better than us so we need some luck regardless.

 

[SotaHawk87]

Never complain about winning. We could have shot 55% and lost. We missed 8 layups so factor that into shooting percentages as well.

Nova is a lot better than us so we need some luck regardless.

Yes because if you read my post you'll see I was for sure complaining not listing facts!

 

[broth87]

Never complain about winning. We could have shot 55% and lost. We missed 8 layups so factor that into shooting percentages as well.

Nova is a lot better than us so we need some luck regardless.

Villanova is not a lot better than us, not talent wise anyways. Tired of reading that. I would say Villanova is better coached, players understand roles and limitations better, and they probably have better leadership. But talent wise we're just as good as they are. If we play smart basketballs tomorrow, which we haven't in weeks, if we actually play inside out and use all 5 guys on the court, if guys accept their roles and we don't see Uhl shoot every damn time he touches the ball, if Fran coaches smart, there's no question we can beat Villanova tomorrow.