ADVERTISEMENT

9 out of 10 COVID deaths are among the fully vaccinated in the UK

MOAR Youtube videos.

Zero publications and investigative articles.

Shocking. (not)
The piece is about Doctors who work with the Israeli Ministry of Health who conducted a 6 month study investigating adverse reactions admit that the published report is inconsistent with their findings. The Doctors found all sorts of issues such as new reactions, and known reactions lasted significantly longer than previously advertised, but the publication did not include any of it. The report is fraudulent, or so they claim. Then they apparently have the head researcher warning the Ministry of Health that they need to be careful about how they present these findings so it doesn't lead to a massive amount of lawsuits.
 
The piece is about Doctors who work with the Israeli Ministry of Health who conducted a 6 month study investigating adverse reactions admit that the published report is inconsistent with their findings. The Doctors found all sorts of issues such as new reactions, and known reactions lasted significantly longer than previously advertised, but the publication did not include any of it. The report is fraudulent, or so they claim. Then they apparently have the head researcher warning the Ministry of Health that they need to be careful about how they present these findings so it doesn't lead to a massive amount of lawsuits.

And they cannot publish their findings, so they have to make a Youtube video instead.

Got it.

Remember "America's Frontline Doctors" and how they grifted millions with useless ivermectin? There are grifters everywhere, so don't jump onboard every Youtube video that gets posted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk and *33*
And they cannot publish their findings, so they have to make a Youtube video instead.

Got it.

Remember "America's Frontline Doctors" and how they grifted millions with useless ivermectin? There are grifters everywhere, so don't jump onboard every Youtube video that gets posted.
It's supposedly a leaked video, apparently with those performing and in charge of the study basically admitting the published report was fraudulent.

Now, go see if you can find a peer reviewed study on these happenings, be sure it's in a reputable journal, with a large sample size, and stick it into your bung hole.
 
It's supposedly a leaked video

Yes....that's what it always is.

Not any actual "data".

Here's "data" for you, from the American Heart Association

COVID-19 infection poses higher risk for myocarditis than vaccines​

The overall risk of myocarditis – inflammation of the heart muscle – is substantially higher immediately after being infected with COVID-19 than it is in the weeks following vaccination for the coronavirus, a large new study in England shows.

The detailed analysis of nearly 43 million people was published Monday in the American Heart Association journal Circulation.

"We found that across this large dataset, the entire COVID-19-vaccinated population of England during an important 12-month period of the pandemic when the COVID-19 vaccines first became available, the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination was quite small compared to the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 infection," the study's lead author, Martina Patone, said in a news release. She is a statistician at the University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences in England.

"This analysis provides important information that may help guide public health vaccine campaigns, particularly since COVID-19 vaccination has expanded in many parts of the world to include children as young as 6 months old," Patone said.



No one had to "leak" this, because it was an independent study. By scientists and physicians.

OVER a dozen authors and co-authors.
 
You didn't read, watch, or learn anything about what was posted for you.
That's because it's unverified garbage.

Go read the published information on Covid vaccines vs Covid for "heart issues".
Covid is WAY more dangerous, AINEC.
 
You didn't read, watch, or learn anything about what was posted for you. Good job, brainwash.

I did... at least the slide deck and if this is your "expert" witness you really are an idiot.


Trys to show "evidence" by showing cases in state when mask mandates went into effect?? A real "expert" opinion there.


Brings up Denmark study and states no statistical significance. Which is one of the dumbest things someone can say. Anyone who is an "expert" wouldn't make that mistake.

Question if something has a p= 0.049 and another of 0.051 does that mean one is significantly better?

If you set an unrealistic reduction of infection for masks, does that make the data worthless? Can you calculate NNT/NNH for the Denmark study like asked earlier?? Are this numbers clinically significant?

Why would an expert talk in depth of size of particle but not at least acknowledge impaction and diffusion?? Seems odd to not address such simple concepts even of just to discredit those points...
 
Last edited:
So this is simply the pendulum swinging the other way. Pre vaccine, anybody who died and had COVID at the time, was a death by COVID. Now post vaccine, any body who dies and has COVID AND had a vaccine, well it's obviously causal.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kenneth Griffin
So this is simply the pendulum swinging the other way. Pre vaccine, anybody who died and had COVID at the time, was a death by COVID. Now post vaccine, any body who dies and has COVID AND had a vaccine, well it's obviously causal.

LOLWUT?

The RATES of people dying right now are far MORE likely for those w/o vaccinations. By quite a large margin.
 
I did... at least the slide deck and if this is your "expert" witness you really are an idiot.


Trys to show "evidence" by showing cases in state when mask mandates went into effect?? A real "expert" opinion there.


Brings up Denmark study and states no statistical significance. Which is one of the dumbest things someone can say. Anyone who is an "expert" wouldn't make that mistake.

Question if something has a p= 0.049 and another of 0.051 does that mean one is significantly better?

If you set an unrealistic reduction of infection for masks, does that make the data worthless? Can you calculate NNT/NNH for the Denmark study like asked earlier?? Are this numbers clinically significant?

Why would an expert talk in depth of size of particle but not at least acknowledge impaction and diffusion?? Seems odd to not address such simple concepts even of just to discredit those points...
Lmao! You're an idiot. What a bunch of shit you wrote. Cya
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalbornhawk
Lmao! You're an idiot. What a bunch of shit you wrote. Cya
Everybody with a brain has to realize at this point that vaccines and masks were both nothing but a bunch of baloney, if not dangerous. I feel bad for the good people in society who fell for it initially. I do not feel bad for the morons who come to places like this and STILL side with these pharma companies who obviously set out to deceive the public, trying to sell people on them. They're either fully stupid OR fully dishonest.
 
Lmao! You're an idiot. What a bunch of shit you wrote. Cya

Everybody with a brain has to realize at this point that vaccines and masks were both nothing but a bunch of baloney, if not dangerous. I feel bad for the good people in society who fell for it initially. I do not feel bad for the morons who come to places like this and STILL side with these pharma companies who obviously set out to deceive the public, trying to sell people on them. They're either fully stupid OR fully dishonest.

The combined mental prowess of these two posters is still less than the iowa offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
Everybody with a brain has to realize at this point that vaccines and masks were both nothing but a bunch of baloney, if not dangerous.

Everybody with an abnormal brain.

Unvaccinated people have a 3x higher likelihood of dying from Covid.
Masks delayed the spread where used properly.
 
More evidence they're actively keeping healthcare workers from reporting to VAERS. When can we have an honest conversation about the adverse reactions? How are we going to develop a legit cost/benefit analysis if we're not being allowed to be honest about the costs?
 
Last edited:
LOLWUT?

Anyone can "report to VAERS"

Including the guy who claimed the vaccines "turned him into The Hulk"... 🤣
They sure are making sure to keep it to a dishonest minimum though, aren't they Joe? Our resident HROT pharma shill, a bright beacon of hope for the corrupt.
 
They sure are making sure to keep it to a dishonest minimum though, aren't they Joe?

Again: Completely FALSE.

VAERS is an open database of UNVERIFIED vaccine adverse events. It is the clearinghouse that researchers and doctors and pharmaceutical companies can follow up on alleged events to look for trends/signals.

Independent researchers and universities routinely parse that data and independently publish findings from it.
 
...is anyone dying of the original Covid strain, anymore?

Nope.
What a moronic post. You are the one touting the boosters. Do they work, or not? If they work, nobody who's boosted should be dying, right?

Here's another statistic, being touted in vaccine booster commercials - 90% of COVID deaths are people over 50 years old. That hasn't changed since the beginning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinehawk
What a moronic post.

What a moronic take.
Original Covid strain is DOA.

Vaccines still have substantial benefits against the newer variants. Just not 100%. But enough to reduce your risk of dying from Covid by 10x or better.
 
What a moronic post. You are the one touting the boosters. Do they work, or not? If they work, nobody who's boosted should be dying, right?

Here's another statistic, being touted in vaccine booster commercials - 90% of COVID deaths are people over 50 years old. That hasn't changed since the beginning.
Right, the ads push the booster for "over 50%, heart condition, other serious medical problem" - NOT everybody, not kids
 
  • Like
Reactions: Finance85
They sure are making sure to keep it to a dishonest minimum though, aren't they Joe? Our resident HROT pharma shill, a bright beacon of hope for the corrupt.
More evidence they're actively keeping healthcare workers from reporting to VAERS. When can we have an honest conversation about the adverse reactions? How are we going to develop a legit cost/benefit analysis if we're not being allowed to be honest about the costs?
Really?? That's weird, cause when we did tens of thousands of shots we had VAERS qr codes plastered over the building... also a hosp IT Specialist would be on-site to help pts sign up
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joes Place
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT