ADVERTISEMENT

A guide to the allegations of Bill Clinton’s womanizing

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,446
62,566
113
Since the wingnuts are so eager to dredge this stuff up, a refresher might be helpful for everyone:

On Twitter, Donald Trump, the GOP presidential front-runner, lashed out at Hillary Clinton, directly attacking her husband, the former president, for what Trump called “his terrible record of women abuse.”


Trump is obviously referring to the sexual allegations that have long swirled around Clinton, even before he became president. We’d earlier explored this question in 2014 when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrongly claimed that a half dozen women had called Clinton a “sexual predator.” But for younger voters who may be wondering what the fuss is about, here again is a guide to the various claims made about Clinton’s sex life.

We will divide the stories into two parts: consensual liaisons admitted by the women in question and allegations of an unwanted sexual encounter.

Consensual affairs
Gennifer Flowers — a model and actress whose claims of a long-term affair nearly wrecked Clinton’s first run for the presidency in 1992. (Clinton denied her claims at the time, but under oath in 1998 he acknowledged a sexual encounter with her.)

Monica Lewinsky — intern at the White House, whose affair with Clinton fueled impeachment charges. This was a consensual affair, in which Lewinsky was an eager participant; she was 22 when the affair started and Clinton was her boss.

Dolly Kyle Browning — A high school friend who said in a sworn declaration that she had had a 22-year off-and-on sexual relationship with Clinton.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen — a former Miss America who said she had a one-night stand with Clinton while he was governor — and she was married. She went public to specifically deny reports he had forced himself on her.

Some might argue that because Lewinsky and Gracen had relations when Clinton was in a position of executive authority, Clinton engaged in sexual harassment.

Scandal-plagued politicians: Where are they now?
.
Allegations of an unwanted sexual encounter
Paula Jones — A former Arkansas state employee who alleged that in 1991 Clinton, while governor, propositioned her and exposed himself. She later filed a sexual harassment suit, and it was during a deposition in that suit that Clinton initially denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky. Clinton in 1998 settled the suit for $850,000, with no apology or admission of guilt. All but $200,000 was directed to pay legal fees.

Juanita Broaddrick — The nursing home administrator emerged after the impeachment trial to allege that 21 years earlier Clinton had raped her. Clinton flatly denied the claim, and there were inconsistencies in her story. No charges were ever brought.

Kathleen Willey — The former White House aide claimed Clinton groped her in his office in 1993, on the same day when her husband, facing embezzlement charges, died in an apparent suicide. (Her story changed over time. During a deposition in the Paula Jones matter, she initially said she had no recollection about whether Clinton kissed her and insisted he did not fondle her.) Clinton denied her account, and the independent prosecutor concluded “there is insufficient evidence to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that President Clinton’s testimony regarding Kathleen Willey was false.” Willey later began to claim Clinton had a hand in her husband’s death, even though her husband left behind a suicide note.

Note that no court of law ever found Clinton guilty of the accusations.

Peter Baker, in “The Breach,” the definitive account of the impeachment saga, reported that House investigators later found in the files of the independent prosecutor that Jones’s lawyers had collected the names of 21 different women they suspected had had a sexual relationship with Clinton. Baker described the files as “wild allegations, sometimes based on nothing more than hearsay claims of third-party witnesses.” But there were some allegations (page 138) that suggested unwelcome advances:

“One woman was alleged to have been asked by Clinton to give him oral sex in a car while he was the state attorney general (a claim she denied). A former Arkansas state employee said that during a presentation, then-Governor Clinton walked behind her and rubbed his pelvis up against her repeatedly. A woman identified as a third cousin of Clinton’s supposedly told her drug counselor during treatment in Arkansas that she was abused by Clinton when she was baby-sitting at the Governor’s Mansion in Little Rock.”

The Bottom Line
Trump’s claim is a bit too vague for a fact check. In any case, we imagine readers will have widely divergent reactions to this list of admitted affairs and unproven allegations of unwanted sexual encounters. But at least you now know the specific cases that Trump is referencing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-top-stories_factcheck_1045am:homepage/story
 
  • Like
Reactions: IaHawk44
I do think it's funny that Hilary tries to set herself up as the feminist candidate and unsurprisingly most feminists seem to be behind her but yet she's married to a serial womanizer.

Rapist or not the man is a serial womanizer.

The sexual assault thing is an added thing. Liberals say we should just unquestioningly believe everyone who makes an accusation but yet don't believe it when the accusations where made against Clinton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
Can you not understand any difference when the accused is her friggin' husband? If your wife was accused of molesting a child would you immediately throw her under the bus?
Are you this convicted to supplying excuses here? He cheated on her, multiple times, it's not debatable. She showed that she's more interested in her career than morality itself. She's useless, weak, and her followers are weaker versions of her.

Grow a pair and become a human, you lost and uninspiring statistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
Can you not understand any difference when the accused is her friggin' husband? If your wife was accused of molesting a child would you immediately throw her under the bus?
It really isn't different. If you are going to make a blanket statement that blanket must cover everyone including your family. If you fail to abide by that, then you are a hypocrite. Or better yet, don't make blanket statements to start with. If you can't apply an idea to yourself or loved ones, you shouldn't apply it to anyone.
 
Are you this convicted to supplying excuses here? He cheated on her, multiple times, it's not debatable. She showed that she's more interested in her career than morality itself. She's useless, weak, and her followers are weaker versions of her.

Grow a pair and become a human, you lost and uninspiring statistic.

Wow, your CDS is spilling over today. As I've said a hundred times, I'm not a Hillary supporter, but the relentless attacks on her are frothing-mouthed insane. You're attacking her for something her husband did. And I've never seen so many bullshit, trumped up charges brought against a family as the Clintons. Is he a womanizer? Fo sho. Is he a sexual predator? I don't know, but I can understand why HIS WIFE might give him the benefit of the doubt.
 
Wow, your CDS is spilling over today. As I've said a hundred times, I'm not a Hillary supporter, but the relentless attacks on her are frothing-mouthed insane. You're attacking her for something her husband did. And I've never seen so many bullshit, trumped up charges brought against a family as the Clintons. Is he a womanizer? Fo sho. Is he a sexual predator? I don't know, but I can understand why HIS WIFE might give him the benefit of the doubt.

He's attacking her for standing by her man after repeated incidents of infidelity. That's not something her husband did.
 
Nothing says "Presidential" like being in charge of your husband's bimbo eruptions and destroying the reputation of those who dare to accuse him of rape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
He's attacking her for standing by her man after repeated incidents of infidelity. That's not something her husband did.

tumblr_inline_nu43l2371V1r9wnjn_500.gif
 
Nothing says "Presidential" like being in charge of your husband's bimbo eruptions and destroying the reputation of those who dare to accuse him of rape.

Yet your GOP cronies are queuing up to vote for Trump, who is an unapologetic womanizer. Cry me your crocodile tears.
 
Yet your GOP cronies are queuing up to vote for Trump, who is an unapologetic womanizer. Cry me your crocodile tears.

Trump does it because he's a sleezbag.

Hillary stays with a sleezbag because she would be nothing without him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattski
Since the wingnuts are so eager to dredge this stuff up, a refresher might be helpful for everyone:

On Twitter, Donald Trump, the GOP presidential front-runner, lashed out at Hillary Clinton, directly attacking her husband, the former president, for what Trump called “his terrible record of women abuse.”


Trump is obviously referring to the sexual allegations that have long swirled around Clinton, even before he became president. We’d earlier explored this question in 2014 when Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) wrongly claimed that a half dozen women had called Clinton a “sexual predator.” But for younger voters who may be wondering what the fuss is about, here again is a guide to the various claims made about Clinton’s sex life.

We will divide the stories into two parts: consensual liaisons admitted by the women in question and allegations of an unwanted sexual encounter.

Consensual affairs
Gennifer Flowers — a model and actress whose claims of a long-term affair nearly wrecked Clinton’s first run for the presidency in 1992. (Clinton denied her claims at the time, but under oath in 1998 he acknowledged a sexual encounter with her.)

Monica Lewinsky — intern at the White House, whose affair with Clinton fueled impeachment charges. This was a consensual affair, in which Lewinsky was an eager participant; she was 22 when the affair started and Clinton was her boss.

Dolly Kyle Browning — A high school friend who said in a sworn declaration that she had had a 22-year off-and-on sexual relationship with Clinton.

Elizabeth Ward Gracen — a former Miss America who said she had a one-night stand with Clinton while he was governor — and she was married. She went public to specifically deny reports he had forced himself on her.

Some might argue that because Lewinsky and Gracen had relations when Clinton was in a position of executive authority, Clinton engaged in sexual harassment.

Scandal-plagued politicians: Where are they now?
.
Allegations of an unwanted sexual encounter
Paula Jones — A former Arkansas state employee who alleged that in 1991 Clinton, while governor, propositioned her and exposed himself. She later filed a sexual harassment suit, and it was during a deposition in that suit that Clinton initially denied having sexual relations with Lewinsky. Clinton in 1998 settled the suit for $850,000, with no apology or admission of guilt. All but $200,000 was directed to pay legal fees.

Juanita Broaddrick — The nursing home administrator emerged after the impeachment trial to allege that 21 years earlier Clinton had raped her. Clinton flatly denied the claim, and there were inconsistencies in her story. No charges were ever brought.

Kathleen Willey — The former White House aide claimed Clinton groped her in his office in 1993, on the same day when her husband, facing embezzlement charges, died in an apparent suicide. (Her story changed over time. During a deposition in the Paula Jones matter, she initially said she had no recollection about whether Clinton kissed her and insisted he did not fondle her.) Clinton denied her account, and the independent prosecutor concluded “there is insufficient evidence to prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that President Clinton’s testimony regarding Kathleen Willey was false.” Willey later began to claim Clinton had a hand in her husband’s death, even though her husband left behind a suicide note.

Note that no court of law ever found Clinton guilty of the accusations.

Peter Baker, in “The Breach,” the definitive account of the impeachment saga, reported that House investigators later found in the files of the independent prosecutor that Jones’s lawyers had collected the names of 21 different women they suspected had had a sexual relationship with Clinton. Baker described the files as “wild allegations, sometimes based on nothing more than hearsay claims of third-party witnesses.” But there were some allegations (page 138) that suggested unwelcome advances:

“One woman was alleged to have been asked by Clinton to give him oral sex in a car while he was the state attorney general (a claim she denied). A former Arkansas state employee said that during a presentation, then-Governor Clinton walked behind her and rubbed his pelvis up against her repeatedly. A woman identified as a third cousin of Clinton’s supposedly told her drug counselor during treatment in Arkansas that she was abused by Clinton when she was baby-sitting at the Governor’s Mansion in Little Rock.”

The Bottom Line
Trump’s claim is a bit too vague for a fact check. In any case, we imagine readers will have widely divergent reactions to this list of admitted affairs and unproven allegations of unwanted sexual encounters. But at least you now know the specific cases that Trump is referencing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/12/30/a-guide-to-the-allegations-of-bill-clintons-womanizing/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_factcheck_1045am:homepage/story


Interesting... your article left out the trips to Pedo Island.
 
Wow, your CDS is spilling over today. As I've said a hundred times, I'm not a Hillary supporter, but the relentless attacks on her are frothing-mouthed insane. You're attacking her for something her husband did. And I've never seen so many bullshit, trumped up charges brought against a family as the Clintons. Is he a womanizer? Fo sho. Is he a sexual predator? I don't know, but I can understand why HIS WIFE might give him the benefit of the doubt.
You're a cubs fans accusing someone of CDS(what is CDS btw)? Disgusting, unfruitful, lacking diversified yoga knowledge. She deserves the relentless attacks you cannibalistic winky wonk. She's a tyrant in disguise, she's mean to African students, she likes to bomb with the best of them, her legs are upside down for christs and yodas sake. I don't give a rotten bonk womp if he's a womanizer or not, I'm concerned with the Hillary sympathizers.
She could punch a black ghey man and still be defended by the so called "non-Hillary supporters". Are you going to make a video with you under a blanket crying "Leave Hillary ALOOONNNEE!!!?"
I suggest you find a better lego set, or lego of whoevers eggo you have 'borrowed'. It's just getting too creepy.
 
Interesting... your article left out the trips to Pedo Island.
Somewhat related, Clinton acknowledged Bohemian Grove one camera years back. He didn't have a very 'liberal' response to being questioned about it. I'm sure he's changed though.

 
You're a cubs fans accusing someone of CDS(what is CDS btw)? Disgusting, unfruitful, lacking diversified yoga knowledge. She deserves the relentless attacks you cannibalistic winky wonk. She's a tyrant in disguise, she's mean to African students, she likes to bomb with the best of them, her legs are upside down for christs and yodas sake. I don't give a rotten bonk womp if he's a womanizer or not, I'm concerned with the Hillary sympathizers.
She could punch a black ghey man and still be defended by the so called "non-Hillary supporters". Are you going to make a video with you under a blanket crying "Leave Hillary ALOOONNNEE!!!?"
I suggest you find a better lego set, or lego of whoevers eggo you have 'borrowed'. It's just getting too creepy.

Clinton Derangement Syndrome - you see fault in everything a Clinton does, whether it's bad or not. Same thing you do to Obama. Face it, she could sneeze and you'd blame her for Ebola.
 
Clinton Derangement Syndrome - you see fault in everything a Clinton does, whether it's bad or not. Same thing you do to Obama. Face it, she could sneeze and you'd blame her for Ebola.
So what? They are people who have helped raise the prison rates, failed at the war on drugs, also raising the prison rates, paved the way into Iraq, dropped bombs on children, morally indecent, corrupt, and power hungry.

Prime is the leader of HROT for a reason, as he is able to be as blunt as life itself. Grow up Cubs, life is about as moral as a Hurricane.
 
So what? They are people who have helped raise the prison rates, failed at the war on drugs, also raising the prison rates, paved the way into Iraq, dropped bombs on children, morally indecent, corrupt, and power hungry.

Prime is the leader of HROT for a reason, as he is able to be as blunt as life itself. Grow up Cubs, life is about as moral as a Hurricane.

Your posts are making less and less sense today. Are you having a stroke?
 
I thought only Trump gave the bum's rush to people in the audience he didn't like?
The Clintons have been doing it for years. Most of the "TOP" Conservatives and Liberals do exactly the same. Any question that they don't like and suddenly people are getting escorted out.

This country wants someone to lead them, when they should be looking to lead themselves. That is the sickness we have here.
 
Did anyone read the article that came out years ago by the Arkansas State troopers about Bill Clinton? The Clinton's are one dysfunctional marriage.
 
Wow, your CDS is spilling over today. As I've said a hundred times, I'm not a Hillary supporter, but the relentless attacks on her are frothing-mouthed insane. You're attacking her for something her husband did. And I've never seen so many bullshit, trumped up charges brought against a family as the Clintons. Is he a womanizer? Fo sho. Is he a sexual predator? I don't know, but I can understand why HIS WIFE might give him the benefit of the doubt.

His wife just happens to be the woman screaming that we should believe every woman who says she's been raped. But doesn't believe the ones that accused her husband.

That's hypocrisy.
 
His wife just happens to be the woman screaming that we should believe every woman who says she's been raped. But doesn't believe the ones that accused her husband.

That's hypocrisy.

It's not. If you truly believe what she meant was that every woman should be 100% believed and every accused man is guilty until proven innocent, then you need to take a step back and reevaluate how much Rush Limbaugh you're listening to. She meant that any woman claiming she was sexually assaulted should be treated with respect and not immediately shamed into dropping charges, as is often the case. She initially phrased it poorly, and that's what the right jumped on, because that's what they do.

Before everyone jumps down my throat again, I'm not a Hillary supporter. I don't think she's a wonderful person, and I wouldn't pick her to be my candidate. But the way you can make a mountain out of a mole hill with every single breath she takes is remarkable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
It's not. If you truly believe what she meant was that every woman should be 100% believed and every accused man is guilty until proven innocent, then you need to take a step back and reevaluate how much Rush Limbaugh you're listening to. She meant that any woman claiming she was sexually assaulted should be treated with respect and not immediately shamed into dropping charges, as is often the case. She initially phrased it poorly, and that's what the right jumped on, because that's what they do.

Before everyone jumps down my throat again, I'm not a Hillary supporter. I don't think she's a wonderful person, and I wouldn't pick her to be my candidate. But the way you can make a mountain out of a mole hill with every single breath she takes is remarkable.

Given the show trials we are currently seeing at college campuses, I think that's EXACTLY what she ment.

For the record I don't buy this whole idea that women are being shamed to drop charges. Honestly I think it's something feminist SJW's just say to talk about how they are constantly victims of everything. Desipte what feminists will tell you, society has never been pro rape.
 
Given the show trials we are currently seeing at college campuses, I think that's EXACTLY what she ment.

For the record I don't buy this whole idea that women are being shamed to drop charges. Honestly I think it's something feminist SJW's just say to talk about how they are constantly victims of everything. Desipte what feminists will tell you, society has never been pro rape.

You are very sadly mistaken if you don't believe women are shamed into dropping rape charges. This has nothing to do with right vs. left or progressive politics or social justice. It's a fact, pure and simple, and it happens all the time.
 
You are very sadly mistaken if you don't believe women are shamed into dropping rape charges. This has nothing to do with right vs. left or progressive politics or social justice. It's a fact, pure and simple, and it happens all the time.

False rape allegations arise from the shame of hook-up remorse all the time, too.
 
You are very sadly mistaken if you don't believe women are shamed into dropping rape charges. This has nothing to do with right vs. left or progressive politics or social justice. It's a fact, pure and simple, and it happens all the time.

It's a fact that I've seen almost no evidence for. Seems to me that it's a fact because it's been repeated so often that everyone thinks it's real.

Can you show me evidence of this happening? Something more then just someone's word. Is there a police procedural manual somewhere that says the first thing you do with a person alleging rape is to push her to forget about it and go away?

Preferably ones in situations with a normal guy and not someone who's well known (celeb, athlete, politician)? Not that the person being well known makes it right, but well known people are often allowed to get away with nearly anything, not just rape and people try to cover for them.
 
Absolutely true. Which is why the accused deserves to be innocent until proven guilty... like Bill Clinton.

I would agree with that, but trust me there are a lot of people that don't. And Hilary by her statements is trying to connect with those people. Believe every rape victim doesn't mean investigate every allegation to them. They literally mean just believe it because she said so.

Why do you think that Frat at UVA was protested and attacked immediately after the article and before any investigation. Because people believed the "victim" without investigation.
 
I seem to remember a lot of you trying to crucify Jameis Winston when he was falsely accused of rape. Funny you don't apply the same standard to the Clintons.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT