So another hypothetical/hypothetical/wet dream, and hypothetical. So Clemson isn’t eligible to make the CFP anymore? Oh wait that’s crazy. No Baylor or Okie State? Oh wait not happening.
Which recruits did ISU beat Iowa for the last two years, versus the ones Iowa beat you for
You could say that about the majority of them.
Hey Stinky,
Somebody said ISU is out recruiting Iowa, and they were serious?
Only a clown fan. They are so pathetic that they have to pick and choose small individual recruiting wins and insist that the world ignore where the classes end up in the rankings.
Move on dude. Don’t look at the thread. Lol.
Going forward...Big 10 and SEC schools will have a big-time advantage in recruiting over any school not in these two power conferences due to a much bigger recruiting budget. And while TV money cannot go directly to pay recruits (at the moment) boosters can re-allocate donations from general funds (due to huge TV money) and put it into NIL for recruits/current players. It’s not that hard to understand, but thought I would spell it out to an iswho fan.
I’ll answer your questions...yep, with more $ going to Iowa, I think it will translate into more wins. Iowa thumped USC in a bowl game just a couple years ago...no reason to see that stopping in the future.
If the playoff system eventually goes to 12 teams (which is a strong possibility) then yes...5th place in the Big 10 would likely qualify for a playoff berth.
Lol - keep telling yourself that. Typical clown.
In 3 to 5 years, isu’s recruiting will be negatively impacted, particularly in any head-to-head recruiting match-ups with Iowa, which have historically generally been in Iowa’s favor anyway.
Lol...don’t kid yourself, most isu fans circle the Iowa game every year.
If this thing goes to 20ish team superconferences and a true P2 with the B1G and SEC, the playoffs will be whatever the B1G and SEC (and FOX and ESPN) want it to be. It could effectively neuter the NCAA and CFP as we've known it. It could be similar to the NFL playoffs with the NFC (B1G) and AFC (SEC) staging their own 4- or 6-team playoff, with the winners from each side playing in a championship game.
I think we need to keep playing the Clowns……but only every 3 years in Iowa City, rotating between fellow lower-level teams UNI & Northern Illinois. Then we can see first-hand which players we want to poach for the following season!
Could be; however, even in your scenario...teams from the B10 and SEC have a much better chance at college football playoffs (regardless of the format).
Look the Big 12 even with ASU, Arizona, Colorado and Utah is a left-over league that simply doesn’t have any national brands that will drive significant value. Whether or not it can compare to the Pac12 or ACC is meaningless since the Big Ten and SEC will continue to drive further distance between themselves and the rest of what is now the P5.
I've said it probably 10 times in this thread that there will be a Power 2 and everybody else will lag behind significantly in media revenue. Honestly do you have a reading comprehension problem?
It isn’t going to just be revenue. How many times do I need to tell you? isu and the Big 12 will not get or keep the best recruits, players and coaches. They will go to the Big Ten and SEC. Iowa will be way better off than isu and it won’t be by a little bit and it won’t solely be due to the massive revenue disparity that will get worse.
It's mostly due to people confusing who said what in a long thread and wanting certain things to be true, on both sides. I don't think anyone, including those leading the SEC and B10, know exactly what will happen 3-5 years from now. They have some firm ideas, I think.
Have to be honest, Bryce... you're one of the most reasonable clones that shows up here. I do wonder though.... Why?
You were just saying that isu’s recruiting won’t be affected by this. While the current isu class may not be affected the idea the last few isu classes will occur anytime in the near future is delusional. Meanwhile Iowa’s recruiting will continue to ratchet up as more and more recruits/players decide being in the P2 is better than the alternative.
I think he’s the only Cyclone poster on here that I don’t have on ignore.
I see where the Big 12 is looking into adding some Pack 12 teams to their conference. Teams include Oregon, Arizona, ASU, Stanford, and Utah. Conferences will realign in order to survive.
I don’t think the Big 12 will be over and done with and neither will isu. I also don’t believe neither will be playing in the top level of college football in the next 5-10 years.
Every P5 team in the country plays those types of games. In general, Iowa does better than most.
One key difference between Iowa 2010 and ISU last year was that the Iowa 2010 team got decimated by injuries. Wegher left before the season started. Coker broke his collarbone in fall camp. Hampton was out by the 2nd or 3rd game. At one point we were playing our 6th, 7th and 8th linebackers, including a true freshman from Solon. We had O line injuries too. Oh, and we lost our defensive coordinator a few games into the season too. That team was snakebit starting in fall camp.
ISU loading up on all those low 3* guys, I see.
Why do people on this board care about posters posting posts about hating ISU? I could care less about posters posting concerns about posters hating ISU and some of you act like your opinion is relevant. Move on dude. (AKA don't read the thread)
For some of us, laughing and ridiculing the Clones is fun.
I noticed your clowns weren't included in an expanded pac 12 LOL
