ADVERTISEMENT

ANTIFA is a threat to this nation!

Good comeback. I’m not wrong though. Hell they even attack other leftists who don’t bow to 100% of their thoughts.
And you calling anyone else sheep is a bit of irony.
You do realize you're denigrating a group who's mission is to challenge white supremacy and other such groups, right? And not denigrating white supremacy and other such groups, right? And you know that is a pretty clear indication of where your support lies, right?

I hope you don't know these things and are just spouting off mindlessly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
You do realize you're denigrating a group who's mission is to challenge white supremacy and other such groups, right? And not denigrating white supremacy and other such groups, right? And you know that is a pretty clear indication of where your support lies, right?

I hope you don't know these things and are just spouting off mindlessly.
Whole mission is to challenge white supremacy? Are you kidding. Did you miss the part where they were burning down minority owned business, assaulting minority police? 2 of their main goals is to restore voting rights for felons and legalize pot. Yep, that’s sure challenging white supremacy! Get your head out of your ass.
 
Whole mission is to challenge white supremacy? Are you kidding. Did you miss the part where they were burning down minority owned business, assaulting minority police? 2 of their main goals is to restore voting rights for felons and legalize pot. Yep, that’s sure challenging white supremacy! Get your head out of your ass.

And this is where you demonstrate you are a sheep being led by Fox. Your post is entirely fiction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
You do realize you're denigrating a group who's mission is to challenge white supremacy and other such groups, right? And not denigrating white supremacy and other such groups, right? And you know that is a pretty clear indication of where your support lies, right?

I hope you don't know these things and are just spouting off mindlessly.

So why do the denigrate black people who happen to be cops or God forbid conservative? They use their beliefs as a false guise so people like you will look the other way.
 
The America First movement goes back before Charles Lindbergh. It was demonized by those with imperial ambitions. They were ridiculed for being isolationist which is a lie. In fact, the movement was non-interventionist and encouraged trade relations with all. Today, you see the interventionists placing sanctions on all who refused to bend their knee.

Well it kinda hurt that America first came up opposing entry into WW2 which we pretty much discovered through our own pain that it was not a war that we were realistically going to be able to avoid. So it kind of lost moral authority to speak on the issue.

Dr_Seuss_and_the_wolf_chewed_up_the_children.jpg


Also Charles Lindbergh made anti-semitic comments and the America First committee had a paid German agent working within it. The pilot Laura Ingalls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Ingalls_(aviator)


In late September 1939, Ingalls flew over Washington, D.C. in her Lockheed Orion monoplane, dropping anti-intervention pamphlets. She was arrested for violating White House airspace, but was released within hours.[5] Following the defeat of France in 1940, she approached Baron (Freiherr) Ulrich von Gienanth, the head of the Gestapo in the US, and, officially, second secretary of the German Embassy. She suggested that she make a solo flight to Europe, where she would continue her campaign to promote the Nazi cause. Von Gienanth told her to stay in America to work with the America First Committee.

Ingalls gave speeches for the Committee in which she derided America's "lousy democracy" and gave Nazi salutes. Von Gienanth praised her oratorical skills. She had made a careful study of Mein Kampf, on which she based many of her speeches, as well as pamphlets by Hitler such as My New Order and Germany and the Jewish Question, and Elizabeth Dilling's books The Roosevelt Red Record and The Octopus.[6][7][8] She expected Hitler to win the war; in April 1941, she wrote to a German official, "Some day I will shout my triumph to a great leader and a great people... Heil Hitler!" After the German declaration of war on December 11, 1941, she went straight to Washington to receive a list of contacts from von Gienanth, and was arrested a week later.

Ingalls was charged with failing to register with the government as a paid Nazi agent, in violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938. She had been receiving approximately $300 a month from von Gienanth.[8] During the trial it came out that von Gienanth had encouraged Ingalls's participation in the America First Committee, a significant embarrassment for that organization.[9]

The FBI testified that they had kept her under surveillance for several months.[8][6] Ingalls was convicted, and sentenced to eight months to two years in prison on February 20, 1942.[10] She was transferred from the District of Columbia jail to the U.S. federal women's prison in Alderson, West Virginia, on July 14, 1943, after fighting with another inmate.[6] She was released on October 5, 1943 after serving 20 months.

Prison had not altered her views, however. A few months after her release, she stated her opinion of the Normandy landings:

This whole invasion is a power lust, blood drunk orgy in a war which is unholy and for which the U.S. will be called to terrible accounting... They [the Nazis] fight the common enemy. They fight for independence of Europe—independence from the Jews. Bravo![7]

After her probation ended, in July 1944 Ingalls was arrested at the Mexican border. Her suitcase contained seditious materials, including notes she had made of Japanese and German short-wave radio broadcasts. She was prevented from entering Mexico, but was not prosecuted.[6] Ingalls applied for a presidential pardon in 1950, but her application for clemency was rejected by two successive Pardon Attorneys. On the latter occasion, the reply stated that Ingalls had been of "special value of the Nazi propaganda machine".[11]

Edit: Oh also I found out this little tidbit which goes to show how much projection this America first group has always engaged in.

Their opposition was the Committeee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies (CDAAA).

On occasion, the CDAAA was accused of being a British front by its rivals. After the release of the “Stop Hitler Now” advertisement, Democratic West Virginia senator Rush Holt claimed that its funding was sourced from industrialists, international lawyers, international bankers and directors of corporations in Britain. This painted the committee as a tool of big business and, thus, drove the CDAAA to provide the Department of State with details of those who had contributed financially to the advertisement’s publication and reprinting. This ensured that the “Stop Hitler Now” piece had been funded by “100% American sources.” [17]

So when the CDAAA puts out an advertisement that says we need to stop Hitler, the America First crowd says that British Big business is funding it. So the CDAAA opens the books and shows all their contributions are 100% American. While at the same time the America First committee has a paid German agent giving Nazi salutes and praising Hitler in speeches all over the country.

Also the America first group was notably anti-semitic while the CDAAA specifically targeted minority groups to join their cause and pushed for anti-discriminiatory laws.

America first - Always on the wrong side of history.

Shouldn't have trusted them then, shouldn't be trusting them now. No one should ever trust them again.
 
Last edited:
The whole post. How difficult is that? Every statement he made was false, untrue, fiction.

So minority businesses were looted and burned down by conservatives? Numerous videos showing antifa calling black police officers the n word and black judas..they aren't true?
 
So minority businesses were looted and burned down by conservatives? Numerous videos showing antifa calling black police officers the n word and black judas..they aren't true?

Is the world divided between conservatives and ANTIFA? If your definition is "anyone who isn't conservative" you would have a point.
 
Last edited:
Is the world divided between conservatives and ANTIFA? If you're definition is "anyone who isn't conservative" you would have a point.

so you agree Antifa has done those things you labeled as fiction?
 
Whole mission is to challenge white supremacy? Are you kidding. Did you miss the part where they were burning down minority owned business, assaulting minority police? 2 of their main goals is to restore voting rights for felons and legalize pot. Yep, that’s sure challenging white supremacy! Get your head out of your ass.
You're simply wrong. It's a shame that you continue to ignore the problems the far right is producing and instead focus on groups that are trying to counter that abomination. It's very similar to those who denigrated Malcolm X and the Black Panthers in the 60s - focus on the resistance to racism rather than racism itself.
 
You're simply wrong. It's a shame that you continue to ignore the problems the far right is producing and instead focus on groups that are trying to counter that abomination. It's very similar to those who denigrated Malcolm X and the Black Panthers in the 60s - focus on the resistance to racism rather than racism itself.
Nothing I said was wrong. All those things indeed did happen.
 
so you agree Antifa has done those things you labeled as fiction?

Again, if ANTIFA is "anyone who is not a conservative" then you are correct. ANTIFA has done all of those things.

But, of course, that premise is beyond absurd. It just happens to be the one some of you guys seem to be operating under.
 
You're simply wrong. It's a shame that you continue to ignore the problems the far right is producing and instead focus on groups that are trying to counter that abomination. It's very similar to those who denigrated Malcolm X and the Black Panthers in the 60s - focus on the resistance to racism rather than racism itself.
And speaking of ignoring problems, you seem to have no problem with the left burning looting and beating people.
 
You're simply wrong. It's a shame that you continue to ignore the problems the far right is producing and instead focus on groups that are trying to counter that abomination. It's very similar to those who denigrated Malcolm X and the Black Panthers in the 60s - focus on the resistance to racism rather than racism itself.

Those same groups (antifa) is an inherent racist organization, BLM has taken the far left stance of Marxism and anti semitism. Is that what we should support?
 
Again, if ANTIFA is "anyone who is not a conservative" then you are correct. ANTIFA has done all of those things.

But, of course, that premise is beyond absurd. It just happens to be the one some of you guys seem to be operating under.
No antifa is the group protesting, looting, and burning stuff. They wave their flags, it’s pretty obvious to anyone who isn’t a partisan moron who’s doing it.
 
Again, if ANTIFA is "anyone who is not a conservative" then you are correct. ANTIFA has done all of those things.

But, of course, that premise is beyond absurd. It just happens to be the one some of you guys seem to be operating under.

lets take out the anyone is not conservative and look at Antifa especially in Minneapolis, did they not burn down buildings and call black cops the n word?
 
So why do the denigrate black people who happen to be cops or God forbid conservative? They use their beliefs as a false guise so people like you will look the other way.
???? If someone is ignoring or supporting supremacy groups or other of the ilk they deserve to be denigrated and called out. Protesting against police brutality and calling for reform includes all police.

Again, I don't agree with the Antifa's tactics or those who take extreme measures/violence in their protests. I do, however, understand their underlying motivation and it is far, far more noble than those of the far right.

Perhaps if we had more people admonishing white supremacy and other oppressive groups/actions the efforts of the Antifa and violence would cease. At this point, it seems to be the only thing getting attention on the matters at hand.
 
Well it kinda hurt that America first came up opposing entry into WW2 which we pretty much discovered through our own pain that it was not a war that we were realistically going to be able to avoid. So it kind of lost moral authority to speak on the issue.

Dr_Seuss_and_the_wolf_chewed_up_the_children.jpg


Also Charles Lindbergh made anti-semitic comments and the America First committee had a paid German agent working within it. The pilot Laura Ingalls.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Ingalls_(aviator)
Well, we could've avoided it, but, were balls deep involved in it. Starting with Rockefeller's PR man, Ivy Lee, coaching up Hitler and his oratory skills. All the way to the Luftwaffe not being able to get off the ground without Standard Oil's patented jet fuel.

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/WallStreetCommieRevolution.pdf


https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_Hitler.pdf

Lindbergh was smeared to damage the movement as he was a hero and also made enemies with powerful bankers by ripping the privately owned cartel, The Federal Reserve.
 
???? If someone is ignoring or supporting supremacy groups or other of the ilk they deserve to be denigrated and called out. Protesting against police brutality and calling for reform includes all police.

Again, I don't agree with the Antifa's tactics or those who take extreme measures/violence in their protests. I do, however, understand their underlying motivation and it is far, far more noble than those of the far right.

Perhaps if we had more people admonishing white supremacy and other oppressive groups/actions the efforts of the Antifa and violence would cease. At this point, it seems to be the only thing getting attention on the matters at hand.

So a black police officer who is doing his job deserves to be called a n*(*er? Who exactly is the racist group again?
 
lets take out the anyone is not conservative and look at Antifa especially in Minneapolis, did they not burn down buildings and call black cops the n word?

Not, that I am aware of, no. You realize those protests were BLM, correct? And most of the looting, etc. was done by random thugs and lowlifes who saw an opportunity in the chaos to grab a big-screen tv.

Every legitimate news source that I've read indicates police did not mention an ANTIFA presence.
 
Is the world divided between conservatives and ANTIFA? If you're definition is "anyone who isn't conservative" you would have a point.
Good criticism. But notice his response. It's on him to prove violence and looting by actual Antifa members.

Which - as I've said before, is not to claim that all Antifa sympathizers are saints - just that the burden of proof is on these cons to show that they aren't lying through their teeth, or mindlessly regurgitating the lies of others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artradley
Again, if ANTIFA is "anyone who is not a conservative" then you are correct. ANTIFA has done all of those things.

But, of course, that premise is beyond absurd. It just happens to be the one some of you guys seem to be operating under.
Actually, if Antifa is anyone, then it's true. We know members of far right groups like the Boogaloo Boys were involved in violence to create negative impressions of the protests within conservative ranks.

Fact is, the violence within the protests is bad, really bad. It's terrible that it has happened and should be stopped. But it pales in comparison to white supremacy, racism, police brutality and other oppressive components of our culture that have been ignored for far too long. Focus on this biggest issue - spend energies there to make real progress. That is the best, and probably only, way to stop the protests.
 
Good criticism. But notice his response. It's on him to prove violence and looting by actual Antifa members.

Which - as I've said before, is not to claim that all Antifa sympathizers are saints - just that the burden of proof is on these cons to show that they aren't lying through their teeth, or mindlessly regurgitating the lies of others.

Yep.
 
Not, that I am aware of, no. You realize those protests were BLM, correct? And most of the looting, etc. was done by random thugs and lowlifes who saw an opportunity in the chaos to grab a big-screen tv.

Every legitimate news source that I've read indicates police did not mention an ANTIFA presence.

A big problem the left has is that it always attempts to start these "leaderless movements" and BLM is an example of that. The Wall-street protests were a textbook case study in this.

The problem is that leaderless movements often cant even come up with a consistent set of demands. The other is that with no leader to tell people what they should and should not be doing anything that goes wrong in the area were your group is protesting can be tied back to your group a lot more easy.

If you have actual protest leaders up there with megaphones trying to keep everyone in line and focused, and some people decide to take the time to trash the city, it's easier to say . . . no no our group was here with our leaders doing this. Not breaking shit.

But when you have no leaders, you have no flag to rally around. Everyone just goes and does what they want. You can have 10,000 peaceful protesters but 5 can ruin it for the group.

This CHOP zone is the same way. No leaders.

The left needs to drop this ridiculously flawed system of leading their movements.
 
And speaking of ignoring problems, you seem to have no problem with the left burning looting and beating people.
I have a big problem with that. I simply understand that the root of the problem lies with racism, oppression and the like. The fact that you refuse to call out those far right groups and actions makes you complicit with them and with too many like you it results in the protests we're seeing.

I'll ask you - which do you think deserves protest.

A) a group who's mission is to combat fascists and racists such as neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other far-right extremists.

or

B) groups supporting white supremacy, Nazism and/or other racist/oppressive ideology.

I know you won't answer, but food for thought.
 
A big problem the left has is that it always attempts to start these "leaderless movements" and BLM is an example of that. The Wall-street protests were a textbook case study in this.

The problem is that leaderless movements often cant even come up with a consistent set of demands. The other is that with no leader to tell people what they should and should not be doing anything that goes wrong in the area were your group is protesting can be tied back to your group a lot more easy.

If you have actual protest leaders up there with megaphones trying to keep everyone in line and focused, and some people decide to take the time to trash the city, it's easier to say . . . no no our group was here with our leaders doing this. Not breaking shit.

But when you have no leaders, you have no flag to rally around. Everyone just goes and does what they want. You can have 10,000 peaceful protesters but 5 can ruin it for the group.

This CHOP zone is the same way. No leaders.

The left needs to drop this ridiculously flawed system of leading their movements.

How can "the left" stop doing something that is, by definition, leaderless and not under anyone's control?
 
So a black police officer who is doing his job deserves to be called a n*(*er? Who exactly is the racist group again?
No - he doesn't. That's terrible. It's also not the basis of the Antifa.
 
How can "the left" stop doing something that is, by definition, leaderless and not under anyone's control?

Well they are becoming more organized, they have a Twitter page, a website, and a flag
 
A big problem the left has is that it always attempts to start these "leaderless movements" and BLM is an example of that. The Wall-street protests were a textbook case study in this.

The problem is that leaderless movements often cant even come up with a consistent set of demands. The other is that with no leader to tell people what they should and should not be doing anything that goes wrong in the area were your group is protesting can be tied back to your group a lot more easy.
These are valid criticisms that are sometimes raised by members of those groups themselves.

But that's the risk you run when you genuinely believe in democracy and freedom.

Sadly, it's why the fascist alternatives often win. It's the very rare MLK or Gandhi or Jesus that survives long enough to be remembered, much less win.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT