Who gets a win first this season? ISU or Iowa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He also said the group size was too small to say anything specific on 18-24 years with covid.Hate to say it, but another liberal female who is clueless and deaf. Lost track of how many cardiologists who have come out and stated this is not an issue. Top Cardiologist at Mayo Clinic being one of them. Heard another Cardiologist state that they have had cases where the common cold has been a trigger. These people need to be shown the door.
Severity is what makes Covid uniqueMyocardia is caused by viruses. Any virus, it's not new, it's not unique to COVID.
"Many viruses are commonly associated with myocarditis, including the viruses that cause the common cold (adenovirus); COVID-19; hepatitis B and C; parvovirus, which causes a mild rash, usually in children (fifth disease); and herpes simplex virus. "
That is correct, the annual Nebby beat down will not be on black friday.Weren’t we already not going to play them on Black Friday this year?
Severity is what makes Covid unique
Four at OSU alone, actually. From a pool of 26. Those four athletes should not compete for three monthsNumber of cases in the Big Ten?
Zero
Four at OSU alone, actually. From a pool of 26. Those four athletes should not compete for three months
Ban the whole teamFour at OSU alone, actually. From a pool of 26. Those four athletes should not compete for three months
.....In certain patients.Myocardia isn't an either/or thing, there are degrees of severity. COVID produces a strong inflammatory response in the body, much worse than the cold.
They should disband their football program.Four at OSU alone, actually. From a pool of 26. Those four athletes should not compete for three months
Did you read it?Ok drama queen.
Co-author of Ohio State myocarditis study says it’s no reason to cancel sports
Ohio State cardiologist Dr. Curt Daniels said interpretations of the results and risk of myocarditis in relation to COVID-19 have been misconstrued.amp.usatoday.com
Yea a RARE inflammation of the heart.. now for a active young adult probably even less chance.. if doctors are not concerned then you shouldn’t be either.. smarter people then us are making the best decision on what they know.Did you read it?
4 of 26 tested isnt that rare.Yea a RARE inflammation of the heart.. now for a active young adult probably even less chance.. if doctors are not concerned then you shouldn’t be either.. smarter people then us are making the best decision on what they know.
Sounds to me like enhanced myocardial screening for anyone who tests positive, symptomatic or not, with the chance that someone will be sidelined for three months if tests come back poorly. OSU study would put that incidence at 15%.Yea a RARE inflammation of the heart.. now for a active young adult probably even less chance.. if doctors are not concerned then you shouldn’t be either.. smarter people then us are making the best decision on what they know.
With all this liberal bull crap we’ll play in 2021 maybe.Who gets a win first this season? ISU or Iowa.
Four at OSU alone, actually. From a pool of 26. Those four athletes should not compete for three months
LOLNo, those four athletes should each make individual decisions that reflect the risks and rewards that are unique to them as individuals.
Life's full of risks, but specific risks aren't the same for all. Similarly, the rewards derived from assuming those risks aren't the same for all. Perhaps most importantly, the relative value each individual places on the risks and rewards that are unique to them differ from one individual to the next.
This is why top-down, one-size-fits-all decision-making invariably produces worse results than does leaving decisionmaking in the the hands of the right people who make decisions for the right reasons (each individual).
LOL
"For those who test positive for myocarditis, he said, the standard protocol of rest for three months from rigorous physical activity applies. But those who test negative can resume after the COVID protocols are followed."
No one reads anymore. Snappy headline is all people need.
Sick burn bro.Everyone reads. The problem is thoe of you who can't think.
No, those four athletes should each make individual decisions that reflect the risks and rewards that are unique to them as individuals.
Life's full of risks, but specific risks aren't the same for all. Similarly, the rewards derived from assuming those risks aren't the same for all. Perhaps most importantly, the relative value each individual places on the risks and rewards that are unique to them differ from one individual to the next.
This is why top-down, one-size-fits-all decision-making invariably produces worse results than does leaving decisionmaking in the the hands of the right people who make decisions for the right reasons (each individual).
Sick burn bro.
Sounds like if you get COVID and have positive tests for myocarditis, your season is over.
But myocarditis has also been frequently linked to influenza, correct? Are student athletes constantly getting heart examinations and EKGs after every round of the flu?LOL
"For those who test positive for myocarditis, he said, the standard protocol of rest for three months from rigorous physical activity applies. But those who test negative can resume after the COVID protocols are followed."
No one reads anymore. Snappy headline is all people need.
4 of 26 is high.But myocarditis has also been frequently linked to influenza, correct? Are student athletes constantly getting heart examinations and EKGs after every round of the flu?
Say the risk for myocarditis is a whopping 4x as prevalent in COVID than for influenza, does that mean we should dismiss the potential risk to those student athletes with the common flu? Should sports be suspended if that potential risk (liability) is still there? Nobody has wanted to answer me on that one yet.
It is far rarer than 15% of an otherwise heathy populationHave all athletes had a baseline test of their hearts regarding myocarditis so they know if they have ever had an issue with this prior to COVID-19? If not, how can you make a decision regarding each player and their ability to play?
This is all just smoke and mirrors in trying to prevent the B1G from play football when the NFL, ACC, B12, NBA, MLB, NHL, and high school sports, yes sports are all playing, right now. The B1G liberals should be ashamed of themselves for turning this into a political football.
4 of 26 is high.
We don't know the answers to a lot of your questions.
You’re right, and that’s because nobody has ever looked in to influenza myocarditis in student athletes before, even though we know without question it can be an issue. So we’ve been perfectly fine with players being put at risk for IM (not to mention brain injuries, heat stroke, paralysis, etc) but we’re drawing a line now with COVID.4 of 26 is high.
We don't know the answers to a lot of your questions.
Are you a top cardiologist?Myocardia isn't an either/or thing, there are degrees of severity. COVID produces a strong inflammatory response in the body, much worse than the cold.
Lol this research and discussion is widely availableAre you a top cardiologist?
Also your sexism is showing with impunity.
No, absolutely in no way should a student athlete make a that decision...
No, but I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night.Are you a top cardiologist?