ADVERTISEMENT

Battle Tested - Which weekend to take "off"?

If TnT are going to shoot for Lee getting the min required 17 matches for 1 of the parts of NCAA qua

  • 1/12 Picc (OSU) - 2 potential tournamnts, Cleveland State Open and Shorty Hitchcock Memorial

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • 1/19 Tomasello (OSU) - NO tournaments (that D1 teams are scheduled to participate in)

    Votes: 1 8.3%
  • 1/26 Mattin (UM) - 2 potential tournaments, Appalachian Open, and Duhack Open (is that Coe?)

    Votes: 4 33.3%
  • 2/02 Lizak (Minn), 2/04 Rivera (NWSTN) - 1 potential tournament, Edinboro Open

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • 2/09 Schnupp (PSU) - 1 potential tournament, Warrior Winter Open

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2/18 Allison (ISU) - 2 potential tournaments, Mat Town Open II, or Western National Open

    Votes: 3 25.0%

  • Total voters
    12

andegre

HB Heisman
May 18, 2004
5,436
3,152
113
45
Urbandale, IA
Was looking at Lee's upcoming matches and realized that after today's matchup with Foley, Lee's following 5 matches will all be against top 10 opponents:

https://www.wrestlestat.com/wrestler/49146/lee-spencer/profile

#9 Picc (OSU)
#1 Tomasello (OSU)
#10 Mattin (UM)
#4 Lizak (Minn)
#7 Rivera (NWSTN)

Definitely will be battle-tested after that.

That got me thinking about the 17 required matches for one of the qualifications...see the poll question.
 
Last edited:
I'm a bit confused by this 17-match-minimum being referenced on a number of threads. According to this document for the 2016/17 season, only 8 matches are needed for a obtaining a conference allocation:

https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/DI_Wrestling_Qualifying_Grid_100114_AH_hw.pdf

"A wrestler needs eight matches due to the minimum needed for winning percentage. A wrestler with less than eight would not be eligible for the winning percentage and RPI which means they could not meet two of the three standards. A wrestler DOES NOT need 17 matches to earn an allocation spot, because the wrestler could earn a spot by meeting the threshold in winning percentage and coaches ranking."

Has this changed, or maybe reading it wrong?
 
Correct, but as I read the document, an RPI is not needed to meet the standard for allocation (i.e. a minimum of "silver standard"):

"Earning an allocated spot for the conference. A wrestler must earn either a gold or silver standard to earn an allocated spot for the conference at the designated weight class on the NCAA entry form page. A gold standard wrestler means a wrestler met the threshold level in winning percentage, RPI and coaches ranking. A silver standard wrestler means the wrestler met the threshold level in two of the three criteria of winning percentage, RPI and coaches ranking."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT