You want the GOP weighing in about misinformation on climate, immigration, trans folk and elections. Got it.
They're the sources of the "misinformation", so I guess if you want them reporting themselves, sure.
You want the GOP weighing in about misinformation on climate, immigration, trans folk and elections. Got it.
As long as the "misinformation" is something you don't like, you're good with the government helping in shutting it down, which they are definitely complicit here. If it's the Republicans, then you'll have a completely different stance. And, you'll conjure-up more bullshit to try and justify that.They're the sources of the "misinformation", so I guess if you want them reporting themselves, sure.
Thanks for proving my point.They're the sources of the "misinformation", so I guess if you want them reporting themselves, sure.
As long as the "misinformation" is something you don't like, you're good with the government helping in shutting it down
I'm thinking misinformation is whatever YOU want it to be- here, or there, or anywhere. You're so binary, and you're so unaware of it.I'm thinking you don't understand what "misinformation" is, here....
I'm thinking misinformation is whatever YOU want it to be
Good thing you're hear to explain everything. You never do, but you love to fellate yourself while pretending you are.You seem to be confused on what "misinformation" is.
Do you consider the assertions that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant to be misinformation?You seem to be confused on what "misinformation" is.
Where is that laptop? Did anyone find it?Do you consider the assertions that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant to be misinformation?
If you're at your house having a party and the following people stop by and kindly ask you this question:Because the companies have policies that ANYONE can send the "lists/posts".
"The government" has no ultimate "say" in what they do.
If you're at your house having a party and the following people stop by and kindly ask you this question:
Stranger: "Hello, would you mind inviting the neighbor at the end of the street to your party?"
Neighbor: "Hello, would you mind inviting the neighbor at the end of the street to your party?"
White House Representative: "Hello, would you mind inviting the neighbor at the end of the street to your party?"
You're not "required" to comply in anyway, BUT do you think any of the aforementioned opinions carry any more weight than the other?
Continue to NOT answer the question, please.Facebook has told "the government" to F-off several times already.
You seem to be confused on what "misinformation" is.
Here. Let’s show him an example:You seem to be confused on what "misinformation" is.
Here. Let’s show him an example:
That's not an example. That's you screwing-up.Here. Let’s show him an example:
And at least one person voted illegally. Look it up.FUNFACT: A man in the UK had both sex organs and when he went to the doctor to find out why he was bleeding from his penis, they found out he was actually having "periods".
Google it.
In the hands of the FBI since 2019.Where is that laptop? Did anyone find it?
The government has been working with big tech to monitor child porn, terrorism, and an assortment of other other crimes for years. The idea that there should be zero involvement is nonsense.Did you hear that someone from the government has been reading public comments posted on Facebook and telling Facebook they should be removed?
No respect for freedom of speech!
Republicans used these platforms to try kidnapping the governor of Michigan. They used them to plan the 1/6 coup attempt. I'm pretty sure freedom of speech doesn't apply here.
Jen Psaki specifically said that platforms should work together to take down harmful posts. How can you argue that keeping them up is better?Of course the government shouldn't be, but should the government be making recommendation(s) that private entities should either?
Jen Psaki specifically said that platforms should work together to take down harmful posts. How can you argue that keeping them up is better?
Is it?In the hands of the FBI since 2019.
I thought rudy had it and the FBI refused to take the laptop when he got raided?Is it?
Not according to the "computer shop guy".
I thought rudy had it and the FBI refused to take the laptop when he got raided?
So...your stance is that people should knowingly be able to spread misinformation, even when it is threatening lives.Did you hear that someone from the government has been reading public comments posted on Facebook and telling Facebook they should be removed?
No respect for freedom of speech!
YepSo...your stance is that people should knowingly be able to spread misinformation, even when it is threatening lives.
I did not know there was a "I should be able to falsely yell fire in a movie theater!" crowd, but here we are.
Disinformation from Joes Place, who woulda guessed.Is it?
Not according to the "computer shop guy".
Who gives a shit about Hunter?Disinformation from Joes Place, who woulda guessed.
Laptop was seized by the FBI in December of 2019.
Link
Do you consider the assertions that Hunter Biden's laptop was a Russian plant to be misinformation?
Potential for what?This is just sad.
I USED to think Candace had a lot of potential, apparently I was a fool.
What's with you hyphening gerunds with the word "up"? Is this a new variant on the apostrophe pandemic?That's not an example. That's you screwing-up.
Disinformation from Joes Place, who woulda guessed.
Laptop was seized by the FBI in December of 2019.
It's something I always do... like dotting my I's with little hearts.What's with you hyphening gerunds with the word "up"? Is this a new variant on the apostrophe pandemic?