ADVERTISEMENT

Biden expected to end Title 42 border expulsion policy in late May

FAUlty Gator

HR Legend
Oct 27, 2017
37,953
47,300
113
COVID is over! Another summer full of Border surges.


The Biden administration is planning to end a pandemic-era emergency rule known as Title 42 that allows U.S. immigration authorities to quickly expel migrants and asylum-seekers in late May, several people familiar with the plans told CBS News, describing what would be a major shift in U.S. border policy.

The preliminary decision to gradually discontinue the restriction comes after two federal court rulings in early March dealt a major blow to the Biden administration's plan to retain the expulsions, which began in March 2020 under former President Donald Trump.


Citing directives by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. immigration officials have carried out over 1.7 million expulsions of migrants under Title 42 in the past two years, 70% of them under President Biden, who retained the policy despite reversing other Trump border initiatives.


Named for a 1940s public health law, Title 42 has allowed U.S. border officials to rapidly expel migrants to Mexico or their native countries without allowing them to apply for asylum, a legal safeguard the government has argued it can suspend during a public health emergency.

Since August 2021, the CDC has been charged with reviewing Title 42 every 60 days to determine its continued necessity. The latest reassessment was due Wednesday. CDC spokesperson Kristen Nordlund said the agency was still working on the review and would "release more information later this week."

High-profile Democratic allies of the president, including Senate Majority Chuck Schumer, had been calling on the administration to stop the Title 42 expulsions, citing the relaxation of other pandemic-related restrictions.

Republican lawmakers and some centrist Democrats, however, had urged the administration to continue the expulsions, saying Title 42's rescission could trigger a sharp increase in migrant arrivals that would overwhelm U.S. border authorities and their processing capacity.

"Given the impacts that changes to Title 42 could have on border communities, border security, and migrants, we urge your Administration not to make any changes to Title 42 implementation until you are completely ready to execute and coordinate a comprehensive plan that ensures a secure, orderly, and humane process at the border," Democratic Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly of Arizona wrote in a letter to Mr. Biden last week.

Border
A group of migrant families from Central America walk along side the border wall between the U.S. and Mexico after crossing in to the U.S. near the city of Sasabe, Arizona, Sunday, January 23, 2022. SALWAN GEORGES/THE WASHINGTON POST VIA GETTY IMAGES
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials have been preparing for a potential sharp increase in border arrivals when Title 42 is lifted, including worst-case scenarios in which 12,000 to 18,000 migrants would enter U.S. custody daily, according to an internal contingency plan.


Such scenarios, the contingency plan indicates, would overwhelm U.S. border agents and require the government to dispatch thousands of federal employees to the southern border, double the number of buses and airplanes used to transport migrants and greatly expand capacity at Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processing centers.

In recent weeks, DHS officials have already mobilized hundreds of additional Border Patrol agents and started building new migrant processing facilities, which are supposed to house individuals for no longer than 72 hours. On Monday, CBP also started a new effort to vaccinate thousands of migrants against the coronavirus per day.

For over a year, the Biden administration resisted calls to end Title 42 from advocates for asylum-seekers, saying the policy was necessary to curb the spread of COVID-19 in border processing sites. However, Title 42 was first invoked by the CDC in 2020 over the objections of agency experts who did not believe the measure was necessary to protect public health, according to congressional testimony and CBS News reporting.

Pressure on the administration to end the expulsions, which were always supposed to be temporary, intensified earlier this month following two dueling court rulings.

On March 4, a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., said the administration could not use Title 42 to expel families to places where they could be harmed, finding that the measure does not override U.S. laws designed to protect asylum-seekers fleeing persecution or torture.


Starting in late April, that court ruling will require U.S. immigration agents to interview families with children to determine whether they have valid asylum claims before expelling them, a prospect that would undermine Title 42's stated goal of reducing the time migrants stay on U.S. soil. The administration has not yet announced an appeal of the order
 
I find it strange they'd need some sort of law in place to allow them to quickly expel illegal immigrants and asylum seekers.

I mean, if you show up at the border and don't have your paperwork in order...
 
They just authorized an additional booster for adults over 50, so apparently covid isn't over,.. Why rescind this now?,.. just more political placation for the base.
 
They just authorized an additional booster for adults over 50, so apparently covid isn't over,.. Why rescind this now?,.. just more political placation for the base.
Because keeping these COVID era policies indefinitely is impossible and it has been shown that with proper precautions, like vaccinating and boosters, the risk of death from COVID is small. Certainly within the same range as the flu (I don't have data to confirm that, I'm guessing so if I'm wrong someone please correct me). COVID will never go away, but we have learned to live with it for the most part.
 
Because keeping these COVID era policies indefinitely is impossible and it has been shown that with proper precautions, like vaccinating and boosters, the risk of death from COVID is small. Certainly within the same range as the flu (I don't have data to confirm that, I'm guessing so if I'm wrong someone please correct me). COVID will never go away, but we have learned to live with it for the most part.
...except for all of the additional voting stuff. That stuff should stay forever because "Democracy is over" if we don't.
 
Last edited:
...except for all of the additional voting stuff. That stuff should stay forever because "Democracy is over" is we don't.
Well, that stuff should have always been there. Yes, COVID was the excuse to get them put into law, but anything that increases access to citizens voting is a good thing. But your point is noted. Honestly, I thought someone was going to chirp in about the mask mandates on transportation. But I think that will be ending soon as well. Probably when it actually goes to court.

Then again, if the DOJ doesn't defend this, there will be one less excuse for why they can't prosecute anybody for 1/6.
 
ADVERTISEMENT