ADVERTISEMENT

Biden tells minority voters in Iowa that ‘poor kids’ are just as bright as ‘white kids’

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,749
61,147
113
Former vice president Joe Biden, who has a history of gaffes, Thursday night told a group of mostly minority voters in Iowa that “poor kids” are just as bright as “white kids.”

Biden, who has been leading in national and early state polling for the Democratic presidential nomination, was speaking on the subject of education at a town hall in Des Moines hosted by the Asian and Latino Coalition.

“We should challenge students in these schools that have advanced placement programs in these schools,” Biden said. “We have this notion that somehow if you’re poor, you cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”

After a brief pause, he added: “Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids, no, I really mean it, but think how we think about it.”

[Biden leads in Iowa, but Warren is closing the gap, new poll finds]

His remarks prompted a stir on social media Thursday night, with many focusing on the equivalence he drew, whether intentionally, between poor children and minority children.

President Trump’s campaign highlighted a video clip from the event on its “War Room” account on Twitter. In a separate tweet, the campaign’s rapid response director, Andrew Clark, wrote: “Yikes… have fun mitigating that one.”

In a statement Friday, Biden deputy campaign manager Kate Bedingfield said Biden “misspoke and immediately corrected himself during a refrain he often uses to make the point that all children deserve a fair shot, and children born into lower-income circumstances are just as smart as those born to wealthy parents.”

She also fired back at the Trump campaign for having promoted the video.

“As we approach the two year anniversary of Trump calling neo-Nazis and Klansmen ‘very fine people,’ Donald Trump is desperate to change the subject from his atrocious record of using racism to divide this country,” Bedingfield said, referencing Trump’s comments following the deadly confrontation in Charlottesville in 2017 between self-proclaimed white nationalists and protesters.

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, another Democratic White House hopeful, also sought to draw attention to Biden’s comments — as well as his campaign’s response.

“To quickly dismiss @JoeBiden’s words as a mere ‘slip of the tongue’ is as concerning as what he said,” de Blasio said on Twitter. “We need to have a real conversation about the racism and sexism behind ‘electability.’ ”

Thursday was not the first time Biden’s comments on race have prompted scrutiny.

In February 2007, on the day he launched his bid for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, Biden found himself defending comments made a week earlier in an interview with the New York Observer about then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.).

In the interview, he called Obama “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

[Joe Biden’s big test: To overcome the same problems that doomed his first two presidential campaigns]

Biden issued a statement that day, saying: “I deeply regret any offense my remark in the New York Observer might have caused anyone. That was not my intent and I expressed that to Sen. Obama.”

A Monmouth University poll released Thursday showed Biden leading the Democratic field in Iowa, with 28 percent of possible 2020 Democratic caucus voters. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) placed second, with 19 percent support, up from 7 percent in April.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...26be02-ba8e-11e9-a091-6a96e67d9cce_story.html
 
wide-eyed-odd-expression-on-the-face-of-a-middle-aged-white-male-DH97N3.jpg


That's not good.
 
I love how we vilify people who misspeak or make a mistake and try to attribute them as a racist. This should really go well pegging Joe Biden as a racist.

He is inaccurate though. No one is as bright as the Asians. I guess that makes me an Asian supremacist. :cool:
 
Last edited:
The recent face lift of Joe Biden stretched his face to
the limit. It also gave him brain cramps As he he makes
the journey to become an 80 year old man, he will have
more brain cramps. May we continue to respect our elders.
 
OK, we saw this coming, didn’t we?

Former Vice President Joe Biden, who has a well-known history of gaffes, spouted another one Thursday night by telling a group of mostly minority voters in Iowa that “poor kids” are just as bright as “white kids.”

That’s awkward. But let us not even try to pretend a moral equivalence between Biden’s racial gaffes and the verbal assaults against minority lawmakers that President Donald Trump has committed on purpose.

Biden’s latest blooper occurred while he was speaking off the cuff — always a risky proposition for the talkative Joe — on the issue of education at a town hall in Des Moines hosted by the Asian and Latino Coalition. “We should challenge students in these schools that have advanced placement programs in these schools,” he says on a video clip from the event. “We have this notion that somehow if you’re poor, you cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”

Paid Post What Is This?
He paused there for a moment, perhaps to play back in his mind whether he had just said what he meant to say. Some audience members notably broke into applause, indicating that they heard what he meant to say. Over the applause, he added, “Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids, no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.”

Of course, a lot of people soon were thinking about what Biden was thinking and what he said about it.

Biden has been running well ahead of the crowded Democratic race for the presidential nomination, although Elizabeth Warren has been closing the gap in at least one new poll. That poll, released by Monmouth University on Thursday, shows Biden ahead with 28% of likely 2020 Iowa Democratic caucus voters, and Warren moving up to 19% support, compared to 7% in April.

The misfortune of Biden’s latest blooper is in its reminder of questions that have persistently dogged his candidacy. Is the 76-year-old still sharp enough to handle the presidency or even his own campaign? Can he suppress his tendency on the campaign stump to cheerfully talk his way into linguistic and diplomatic potholes? Is he “woke” enough to satisfy the party’s progressive wing? Or do they ask too much?

Who, for example, could forget the gaffe that sunk his second presidential campaign? On the day in February 2007 when he launched that effort, the then-senator from Delaware found himself defending comments he’d made a week earlier about his rival contender, then-Sen. Barack Obama from Illinois.

Biden intended to compliment Obama in an interview with the New York Observer when he described him as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

That remark ignited a hailstorm of comments and commentary, including some from black writers, including me, to explain why, among other sensitivities, the adjective “articulate” irritates many African Americans with its implication that, for us, speaking English well must be a monumental feat.

Obama did a lot to redeem Biden’s reputation by naming him to be his running mate, a decision that Biden on the stump never lets anyone forget.

This time I hope Biden doesn’t abruptly drop out as a result of this gaffe, as he did in 2007. At this time of heightened national tensions, some of them stirred up by the president’s base-focused campaign, Americans in both parties need to talk more about where this country is going on race and other identity issues, not less.

And, of course, President Trump has done a lot to lower the bar of decency that used to doom the campaigns of candidates who offended women and minorities, intentionally or not, and he has had many defenders.

On Thursday, for example, a reporter for the conservative Breitbart news site accused Biden of misquoting Trump’s infamous description of the white supremacists at the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia, clash between racist and anti-racist groups as “very fine people.”

Breitbart picked up on a popular right-wing talking point that notes Trump’s condemnation of the supremacists elsewhere in his remarks — although not as vigorously, in my view, as his declaration that there were “very fine people on both sides.”

I tend to side with Biden after having seen Trump’s remarks in context. Trump’s condemnation of neo-Nazis and anti-racists argues for a moral equivalence between both sides that, on that day of all days, was not deserved by the side that had the white supremacists.

Voters should now have the opportunity to judge Biden and other contenders not just for what they say but also for what they say they really mean.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colu...0190809-w5yhjadarfeofjtwi4oh4hea7a-story.html
 
I love how we vilify people who misspeak or make a mistake and try to attribute them as a racist. This should really go well pegging Jo Biden as a racist.

He is inaccurate though. No one is as bright as the Asians. I guess that makes me an Asian supremacist. :cool:

Asians are pretty smart.

Terrible drivers, though. ;)
 
We have a minimum age requirement for POTUS. It's time for an age limit.

No one over 65 should be allowed to run.

Yes, I know I'm a bigot.
 
Dems are going to need to decide if they are going to hold their candidates to a traditional standard, where these things should be very costly, or are we going to rate on the Trump scale, where stuff like this doesn't matter at all.

Yeah...fair point. ^^ But they are also going to have to decide if these type of misspeaks only matter if the other guy does it or if they are serious business no matter who does it.

While I acknowledge that this latest Biden gaffe has been widely reported on for the dumb statement that it was...if Trump had said the same thing the words, "racist", "white supremacist", "white nationalist" would have been used about 1000 times by now to "explain" it.
 
Yeah...fair point. ^^ But they are also going to have to decide if these type of misspeaks only matter if the other guy does it or if they are serious business no matter who does it.

While I acknowledge that this latest Biden gaffe has been widely reported on for the dumb statement that it was...if Trump had said the same thing the words, "racist", "white supremacist", "white nationalist" would have been used about 1000 times by now to "explain" it.

Trump probably doesn't believe poor kids are as smart as white kids so we don't have to worry about him saying it.
 
Yeah...fair point. ^^ But they are also going to have to decide if these type of misspeaks only matter if the other guy does it or if they are serious business no matter who does it.

While I acknowledge that this latest Biden gaffe has been widely reported on for the dumb statement that it was...if Trump had said the same thing the words, "racist", "white supremacist", "white nationalist" would have been used about 1000 times by now to "explain" it.

Seriously dude? It’s not even close to the same thing. Trump has a history of making incredibly insensitive racially-charged comments. At the worst, he is a racist; at best, he is race-baiting to rile up his base. Biden making one dumb statement is not comparable and you know that. Stop trying to play the victim card all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Seriously dude? It’s not even close to the same thing. Trump has a history of making incredibly insensitive racially-charged comments. At the worst, he is a racist; at best, he is race-baiting to rile up his base. Biden making one dumb statement is not comparable and you know that. Stop trying to play the victim card all the time.

Would you care to share some specific quotes from Trump that cause you to conclude that he is a racist?

I also don't think you understand what the "victim card" means...as that does not apply to my comment.
 
Would you care to share some specific quotes from Trump that cause you to conclude that he is a racist?

I also don't think you understand what the "victim card" means...as that does not apply to my comment.

Yes, I understand what the victim card means, and you are playing it. You’re whining that’s it’s not fair that people call Trump a racist. You think he’s a victim and being unfairly treated. You’re playing the victim card.

As far as Trump’s racist comments/actions go, that has been discussed ad nauseam on this forum for months. Denying housing to blacks in the 70’s, the Central Park Five, birtherism, calling minority countries “shit hole countries”, telling brown women who were born in the US to go back to where they came from, claiming a judge could not be partial because he is Hispanic, appointing unabashed white nationalists like Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller to advisory positions, etc. The list goes on and on.

Again, like I said- at worst he is a racist; at best, he uses racially-charged language to rile up his base. If you can find a similar pattern of behavior from Biden, I will be willing to admit that the media is setting double standards and being unfair. I’ll be waiting for your response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Biden is a fuggin white supremacist. Get this clown out of govt please.
 
Race.jpg



https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ368279


Fun fact: in California, so many black students were found to be retarded and placed in classes for the retarded that they made it against the law to test their intelligence using the most basic and widely accepted intelligence test in human history that everybody else used and accepts without issue.

https://mobile.edweek.org/c.jsp?cid=25919951&bcid=25919951&rssid=25919941&item=http://api.edweek.org/v1/ew/index.html?uuid=6D18FE9E-2FB7-11DB-BD55-CC2980C3ACA9




What does Joe Biden know that the state of California doesn’t?

I bet Trump will use this chart UNLESS he is running against Yang.
 
We have a minimum age requirement for POTUS. It's time for an age limit.

No one over 65 should be allowed to run.

Yes, I know I'm a bigot.

You'd have to pass a constitutional amendment in order to create such a rule, and since most voters are over 65, good luck with that.
 
OK, we saw this coming, didn’t we?

Former Vice President Joe Biden, who has a well-known history of gaffes, spouted another one Thursday night by telling a group of mostly minority voters in Iowa that “poor kids” are just as bright as “white kids.”

That’s awkward. But let us not even try to pretend a moral equivalence between Biden’s racial gaffes and the verbal assaults against minority lawmakers that President Donald Trump has committed on purpose.

Biden’s latest blooper occurred while he was speaking off the cuff — always a risky proposition for the talkative Joe — on the issue of education at a town hall in Des Moines hosted by the Asian and Latino Coalition. “We should challenge students in these schools that have advanced placement programs in these schools,” he says on a video clip from the event. “We have this notion that somehow if you’re poor, you cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids.”

Paid Post What Is This?
He paused there for a moment, perhaps to play back in his mind whether he had just said what he meant to say. Some audience members notably broke into applause, indicating that they heard what he meant to say. Over the applause, he added, “Wealthy kids, black kids, Asian kids, no I really mean it, but think how we think about it.”

Of course, a lot of people soon were thinking about what Biden was thinking and what he said about it.

Biden has been running well ahead of the crowded Democratic race for the presidential nomination, although Elizabeth Warren has been closing the gap in at least one new poll. That poll, released by Monmouth University on Thursday, shows Biden ahead with 28% of likely 2020 Iowa Democratic caucus voters, and Warren moving up to 19% support, compared to 7% in April.

The misfortune of Biden’s latest blooper is in its reminder of questions that have persistently dogged his candidacy. Is the 76-year-old still sharp enough to handle the presidency or even his own campaign? Can he suppress his tendency on the campaign stump to cheerfully talk his way into linguistic and diplomatic potholes? Is he “woke” enough to satisfy the party’s progressive wing? Or do they ask too much?

Who, for example, could forget the gaffe that sunk his second presidential campaign? On the day in February 2007 when he launched that effort, the then-senator from Delaware found himself defending comments he’d made a week earlier about his rival contender, then-Sen. Barack Obama from Illinois.

Biden intended to compliment Obama in an interview with the New York Observer when he described him as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.”

That remark ignited a hailstorm of comments and commentary, including some from black writers, including me, to explain why, among other sensitivities, the adjective “articulate” irritates many African Americans with its implication that, for us, speaking English well must be a monumental feat.

Obama did a lot to redeem Biden’s reputation by naming him to be his running mate, a decision that Biden on the stump never lets anyone forget.

This time I hope Biden doesn’t abruptly drop out as a result of this gaffe, as he did in 2007. At this time of heightened national tensions, some of them stirred up by the president’s base-focused campaign, Americans in both parties need to talk more about where this country is going on race and other identity issues, not less.

And, of course, President Trump has done a lot to lower the bar of decency that used to doom the campaigns of candidates who offended women and minorities, intentionally or not, and he has had many defenders.

On Thursday, for example, a reporter for the conservative Breitbart news site accused Biden of misquoting Trump’s infamous description of the white supremacists at the 2017 Charlottesville, Virginia, clash between racist and anti-racist groups as “very fine people.”

Breitbart picked up on a popular right-wing talking point that notes Trump’s condemnation of the supremacists elsewhere in his remarks — although not as vigorously, in my view, as his declaration that there were “very fine people on both sides.”

I tend to side with Biden after having seen Trump’s remarks in context. Trump’s condemnation of neo-Nazis and anti-racists argues for a moral equivalence between both sides that, on that day of all days, was not deserved by the side that had the white supremacists.

Voters should now have the opportunity to judge Biden and other contenders not just for what they say but also for what they say they really mean.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/colu...0190809-w5yhjadarfeofjtwi4oh4hea7a-story.html


Ahh....whatabout-ism at its finest
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT