TV revenue and revenue sharing.This is what I think the Iowa Athletic Department feels sometimes. Just keep the money coming in and win 8 games in football and 20 in basketball.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TV revenue and revenue sharing.This is what I think the Iowa Athletic Department feels sometimes. Just keep the money coming in and win 8 games in football and 20 in basketball.
Just means an annual matchup for second best team in Iowa.Not only the Money but the Television exposure. Man I would not want to be a Clown right now. In a few years this is going to really have a huge impact. They are headed to oblivion. I mean dude, they will be the largest fan base in the Missouri Valley. I wonder how that sits with UNI fans.
I think if you asked any Clone official or fan to objectively view this...they'd say this is devastating news for programs outside the B1G. SEC, and ND.The butthurt out there is thick today.
The amount of people with ISU consistently on their mind is pretty embarrassing as well. For being a program that doesn't matter there sure are a lot of people that love to take the low ground with them.The butthurt out there is thick today.
Personally, I just enjoy kicking them when they're down.The amount of people with ISU consistently on their mind is pretty embarrassing as well. For being a program that doesn't matter there sure are a lot of people that love to take the low ground with them.
TV exposure will be a problem for the other conferences, because the most important thing is getting on the main OTA channels. ABC is probably going to do a ton of SEC, and the Big 10 just locked up 3 different OTA channels. That's the big problem.
That said, TV exposure for the middle/bottom of the Big 10 is also going to be a major problem for those teams. It's those 3 big games each week, then if you're a team like Purdue or Indiana you're going to buried on BTN overflow channels or Peacock for 75% of your games.
At this point they better quit trying "to spin things' and figure out a way to get into the B1G or SEC for survival reasonsSo, how do you suppose Clown fans will spin this?
They have already accepted being second class. They are happy as hell they weren’t kicked to the Mountain West yet.At this point they better quit trying "to spin things' and figure out a way to get into the B1G or SEC for survival reasons
There is now a group of four conference rather than five even though it isn't formal. The ACC is not relevant in the context of trends. I don't see members of the Big XII getting more than $20M per year in the future.
Cheerleaders, not cows...That’s to herd the cows across so they don’t keep blocking traffic.
Always was. It's why some of the complaining about basketball no longer being on ESPN just doesn't matter. I'm not sure how I feel about all of this, other than it appears to position Iowa to be in better shape in whatever future version of the expanded college football playoff comes to fruition. It's not as if this influx of $ is going to make Iowa recruit at the level of Michigan or OSU. I suppose it could make a difference if Iowa is competing for a player against a B12 team.
In the old world, it's games that are not picked up on over the air or cable channels/providers. For example, there have been some Iowa non-conference games in past years that were only on BTN+ (Streaming only option, not BTN). Those games are considered Tier 3 content.I'm a hawkeye fan so you are gonna have to explain to me what Tier 3 content means.
So if Iowa is on NBC Peacock we have to pay for a subscription?
I was more referencing guys like Finebaum on his show today, but, ok.The amount of people with ISU consistently on their mind is pretty embarrassing as well. For being a program that doesn't matter there sure are a lot of people that love to take the low ground with them.
I think the B1G will wait until the Pac10 gets their new contract bids, then counter offer a few teams (WA, OR, and/or Stanford) for a Reduced Share of the B1G (but, more $ than the Pac10 offer) e.g. if Pac10 get $50M per team, B1G will give you $60M per year with the promise of equal shares in new 2030 B1G contract.The downstream consequences of this media rights deal is yet to be understood. The Escalator clause that could be used to cover new additions to the conference has to affect the amount of money that the Big XII, PAC 10, and ACC can negotiate. Essentially the ACC has become shoulder programming for the SEC. The PAC 10 contract is about to expire and the Big XII has lost it two big names, those conferences are in a terrible place. It will be hard for the PAC 10 to stay together when it is obvious the Big Ten will expand further.
Does the addition of some PAC 10 teams to the Big XII create more value? It does, but it also means more mouths to feed. There is now a group of four conference rather than five even though it isn't formal. The ACC is not relevant in the context of trends. I don't see members of the Big XII getting more than $20M per year in the future.
And at any rate they will be laughing all the way to the bank with all that $$$$$$. Clone fans still trying to find buts with it.
Iowa State wasn’t ever going to win a national title anyway.At this point they better quit trying "to spin things' and figure out a way to get into the B1G or SEC for survival reasons
That seems very likely. Football programs are expensive to run, but after a while $100M/year is more than you can spend.
First on my list would be to replace the South endzone to mirror the North. I know the South was recently renovated, but just take the L and move on.
Not even close to what title IX is about or covers.I don’t see it. Title IX, distribute equally to every single athlete on campus.
also at that point the common student might want a slice of the action.
shit, a paralegal could win that.
you should see clown fanatic. their anger has now been directed towards Iowa. They can't go more than 2 posts without vitriol-filled envious animosity-laced comments about the Hawks. Iowa's benefit from this is the elephant in the room for those poor clowns.The butthurt out there is thick today.
They need to decide if they want to be a feeder program for iowa or nebby.you should see clown fanatic. their anger has now been directed towards Iowa. They can't go more than 2 posts without vitriol-filled envious animosity-laced comments about the Hawks. Iowa's benefit from this is the elephant in the room for those poor clowns.
peacock is only slated for 2 big 10 games slim chances it is usSo if Iowa is on NBC Peacock we have to pay for a subscription?
Nd is complicated.I saw more like 60 million.
Peacock is $5/month, should not be a big deal if fans want to watch the gamepeacock is only slated for 2 big 10 games slim chances it is us
you should see clown fanatic. their anger has now been directed towards Iowa. They can't go more than 2 posts without vitriol-filled envious animosity-laced comments about the Hawks. Iowa's benefit from this is the elephant in the room for those poor clowns.
Yep, some real bright cyclown fans out there! 😜i thought the Iowa legislature was going to force the Big Ten to take in ISU. Or, the even better one was before last season ISU puffing their chest that the Big has to take them as they were an elite FB team now because of Matt Campbell and had AAU status. A lot changed in a year.
Big 10 wants NC and GTech but the acc breakout is cost prohibitive.Innovative deal, leveraging the coast to coast reach of the conference and multiple media players. SEC still put a better football product on the field and its not close, but is of course more geographically concentrated, and they probably signed too long of a deal with ESPN/ABC. SEC should have had the foresight to anticipate future bargaining power given the explosive population growth in TX, FL, etc.
Thinking of future expansion, there is not a ton of incrementality for SEC looking at schools like Clemson, FSU and Miami. Possibly a defensive move to keep B1G out of the Southeast.
For the B1G, besides ND, I do think taking a look at a few ACC teams makes sense. Maybe UNC, FSU or Clemson?
Georgia Tech is on your list and no one else’s.Big 10 wants NC and GTech but the acc breakout is cost prohibitive.
They will be 6-6 or 7-5 this season. The love affair will continue until Campbell gets tired of it and departs.i thought the Iowa legislature was going to force the Big Ten to take in ISU. Or, the even better one was before last season ISU puffing their chest that the Big has to take them as they were an elite FB team now because of Matt Campbell and had AAU status. A lot changed in a year.
The money is a wash? Please explain. How does ND not leave at least $20 million on the table.Yep - money is essentially a wash for ND. Access to the CFP is probably the only thing that'll force their hand.
Well, that was a mouthful of drivel. You are talking out of your ass and making yourself look like what you are talking out of. Blah Blah. "the way it was constructed previously" You mean like way back in June of 2006 ( generation ago)? Good lord BTN isn't TIER 3 and you cannot simply spin it with a bunch of clown mumbo jumbo. You are regurgitating here the foolishness you are reading on clown fanatic, a place where everyone of those cornpones is suddenly a business media expert.
I think the B1G will wait until the Pac10 gets their new contract bids, then counter offer a few teams (WA, OR, and/or Stanford) for a Reduced Share of the B1G (but, more $ than the Pac10 offer) e.g. if Pac10 get $50M per team, B1G will give you $60M per year with the promise of equal shares in new 2030 B1G contract.
You think Iowa can take money from the network deals and just hand it over to football players and basketball players and shut everybody else out.Not even close to what title IX is about or covers.