ADVERTISEMENT

Big 10/SEC pursuing an agreement for both leagues to play 9 conf games, plus one game against each other. 14 team playoff.

curtisj157

HB All-State
Aug 26, 2021
777
2,193
93
Each league guaranteed 4 teams in playoffs. Hopefully that means we could get rid of that useless, decades old, shit series with ISU!!!! F’n FINALLY!!!! Playing a different SEC team each year is much more exciting than playing that dogshit team nobody cares about every damn year.

https://www.si.com/fannation/colleg...conference-game-schedule-change-cfp-expansion
You mean the team that has a better chance of being in the playoffs every year then we do now with the big 12 getting an auto bid?
 
You mean the team that has a better chance of being in the playoffs every year then we do now with the big 12 getting an auto bid?
Not one good reason to keep that useless, irrelevant series. Up until last year, no one cared outside of the state. By and large, if we lost to ISU, it just meant we were a crappy team. Beat ISU, nobody cared. No body watched outside the state. Piss on that series. I don’t care if it was a guaranteed win every year, it needed to go YEARS ago.
 
Not one good reason to keep that useless, irrelevant series. Up until last year, no one cared outside of the state. By and large, if we lost to ISU, it just meant we were a crappy team. Beat ISU, nobody cared. No body watched outside the state. Piss on that series. I don’t care if it was a guaranteed win every year, it needed to go YEARS ago.
Sorry, but that comment is way overplayed because people don't like that series, but its factually not accurate. Maybe when Fry was coaching and ISU was God awful . Campbell has done a good job, they are recruiting MUCH better then in the past and have been a solid team for most of his tenure. Two years ago they were ranked in the top ten when we played and College Gameday was in Ames. And your comment is NO one cared and NO one watched. BS...Do you think NO one cared in 2002 when the ISU loss (our only loss until the Orange bowl) may have cost us a better shot to go undefeated (USC was a bad matchup, and were probably playing the best football in the country. A team with TWO Heisman trophy winners on it), and a possible undefeated National title. I'm sure NO one cared or had interest in that outcome either..
 
Sorry, but that comment is way overplayed because people don't like that series, but its factually not accurate. Maybe when Fry was coaching and ISU was God awful . Campbell has done a good job, they are recruiting MUCH better then in the past and have been a solid team for most of his tenure. Two years ago they were ranked in the top ten when we played and College Gameday was in Ames. And your comment is NO one cared and NO one watched. BS...Do you think NO one cared in 2002 when the ISU loss (our only loss until the Orange bowl) may have cost us a better shot to go undefeated (USC was a bad matchup, and were probably playing the best football in the country. A team with TWO Heisman trophy winners on it), and a possible undefeated National title. I'm sure NO one cared or had interest in that outcome either..
You can spin it however you want. That series is played out. It's time to schedule new blood.
 
You can spin it however you want. That series is played out. It's time to schedule new blood.
I'm not spinning anything, and I'm fine if we only played them on occasion, BUT repeated that same old "we gain nothing from beating them " is absolutely ridiculous given the current structure. They came within beating ASU from the playoff, and this will not be the last time given the chances at winning the big 12. I'm fine if people don't want the game, but making silly comments like they are so far beneath us is disengeous, and foolish....
 
  • Like
Reactions: RothMatt
I'm not spinning anything, and I'm fine if we only played them on occasion, BUT repeated that same old "we gain nothing from beating them " is absolutely ridiculous given the current structure. They came within beating ASU from the playoff, and this will not be the last time given the chances at winning the big 12. I'm fine if people don't want the game, but making silly comments like they are so far beneath us is disengeous, and foolish....
It has nothing to do with them being beneath us or anything like that....for me at least. It's simply a played out series that I think both sides would benefit from at least pausing, if not outright canceling.
 
It has nothing to do with them being beneath us or anything like that....for me at least. It's simply a played out series that I think both sides would benefit from at least pausing, if not outright canceling.
And my original statement had nothing to do with you. The poster was being his usual dismissive self, that no one we play is worth a damn. Sorry, but we just aren't REALLY that much better then most of the teams on our schedule. Fry and Kirk gave us a couple of really good runs each, but in all honestly be it in the past and certainly going forward we're a second tier program, (like most of the teams we play), and it will take a lot of things falling into place for Iowa to win the conference or advance beyond the first game in the CFP..
 
Getting the SEC to 9 conference games is step 1. It's f*cking stupid that they don't do that already.

Then, getting the SEC to agree to play in B1G environments at points in the season when the temp might dip below 65 is step 2. We saw how limp southern schools went in cold weather in year one of the expanded CFP.

I'd love to see a B1G/SEC agreement and honestly both should have more guaranteed spots in the CFP. It's harder to finish third or fourth in the B1G/SEC than it is to finish first or second in the other P4 conferences. Just the truth.
 
Any mention of getting rid of CCG? I'd be for that as well.
There has been. One rumor is losing the CCG and instead having in-conference play-in games to fill out the B1G's four auto-bids if that's where it ends up... team that finishes 3rd in the regular season playing the team that finishes 6th, and the team that finishes 4th playing the team that finishes 5th, with the two winners getting the 3rd and 4th auto bid.


"An expanded playoff with four guaranteed berths for each conference could also potentially mean the end of the Big Ten and SEC Championship Games, though both conferences are reportedly considering the option of replacing the conference championship games with play-in games for their CFP berths.

One such scenario could feature the conferences’ third-place teams playing against their sixth-place teams with their fourth-place teams playing against their fifth-place teams for the conferences’ last two guaranteed berths. Both Yahoo Sports and The Athletic also floated the possibility that all of the conferences’ top eight teams could play in play-in games, with the first-place team playing the eighth-place team and the second-place team playing the seventh-place team."
 
There has been. One rumor is losing the CCG and instead having in-conference play-in games to fill out the B1G's four auto-bids if that's where it ends up... team that finishes 3rd in the regular season playing the team that finishes 6th, and the team that finishes 4th playing the team that finishes 5th, with the two winners getting the 3rd and 4th auto bid.


"An expanded playoff with four guaranteed berths for each conference could also potentially mean the end of the Big Ten and SEC Championship Games, though both conferences are reportedly considering the option of replacing the conference championship games with play-in games for their CFP berths.

One such scenario could feature the conferences’ third-place teams playing against their sixth-place teams with their fourth-place teams playing against their fifth-place teams for the conferences’ last two guaranteed berths. Both Yahoo Sports and The Athletic also floated the possibility that all of the conferences’ top eight teams could play in play-in games, with the first-place team playing the eighth-place team and the second-place team playing the seventh-place team."
Wow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koalaska
Sorry, but that comment is way overplayed because people don't like that series, but its factually not accurate. Maybe when Fry was coaching and ISU was God awful . Campbell has done a good job, they are recruiting MUCH better then in the past and have been a solid team for most of his tenure. Two years ago they were ranked in the top ten when we played and College Gameday was in Ames. And your comment is NO one cared and NO one watched. BS...Do you think NO one cared in 2002 when the ISU loss (our only loss until the Orange bowl) may have cost us a better shot to go undefeated (USC was a bad matchup, and were probably playing the best football in the country. A team with TWO Heisman trophy winners on it), and a possible undefeated National title. I'm sure NO one cared or had interest in that outcome either..
It is an important game to some fans. Where I work the Hawk and Cyclone fans each wear their team gear on Friday with lots of good-natured teasing going on. It is fun. However, I assume all BIG and SEC teams will have two easy home games for the other two games. Screw Notre Dame, they can join a conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kceasthawk
It has nothing to do with them being beneath us or anything like that....for me at least. It's simply a played out series that I think both sides would benefit from at least pausing, if not outright canceling.
Yes, very stale. When ISU wins it is usually a upset and a very close game. Iowa has a history of winning the much more one-sided games.

All this, plus Iowa having many more strong seasons in the last 15 years, is why Iowa doesnt get much bump for winning but it makes us look bad losing. It held form this year that even though Iowa had a slightly better offense losing that game made Iowa's season look less than average.
 
Not one good reason to keep that useless, irrelevant series. Up until last year, no one cared outside of the state. By and large, if we lost to ISU, it just meant we were a crappy team. Beat ISU, nobody cared. No body watched outside the state. Piss on that series. I don’t care if it was a guaranteed win every year, it needed to go YEARS ago.

I’m fine with the series dropping.

Iowa played only 3 games with higher viewership though.
 
Missed Missouri and Washington. Washington was really close and Missouri was a bowl game and I didn’t look at those, I stand corrected. Point is it’s not like nobody cares about the game outside of Iowa.

For the record I think it’s better for Iowa State not to play it. Iowa State must have 2 or fewer losses to make the playoff if they are ever going to get an at large.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT