i think they will play more than 8 games. making you and your ilk look like idiots.I doubt they will make it to 9 games. Then they will look like idiots
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
i think they will play more than 8 games. making you and your ilk look like idiots.I doubt they will make it to 9 games. Then they will look like idiots
that has already happened. players have tested positive.yes and as soon as one player or coach gets tested positive then it's all over
I earlier wrote that they were testing weekly. That is incorrect. The guidelines mandate testing three times a week.Why would they look like idiots by trying to play football?
Football isn't going to raise or lower any percentage for any age group. I guess the fact that they would not be testing players weekly, conceivably could lower the numbers?
I guess I'll actually be following Iowa State this year. Who else would I care to pull for from any of these other conferences? At least they're in my home state. This is so 2020.
If a vote this controversial was indeed 8-6, with the likes of Maryland and Rutgers tipping the scales and overruling the actual football powers in the league, then we have a bigger problem with the future of the league.There is a rumor that the vote was 8-6 with Ohio Stafe, Penn Stafe, Michigan, Iowa, Purdue and Nebraska dissenting. That would point to a political outcome with McRobbie of Indiana breaking ranks and Michigan and and Penn State also going against the state house. Maryland is red in the statehouse but a dominant blue state overall.
The father of a Purdue player who tested positive has been active on message boards. He did not support cancelling the season.that has already happened. players have tested positive.