Lol, you’re unable to make sense of the claim either. Classic Tarheel.
LOL...pointing out your hypocrisy requires nothing from me. Others see the same thing.
Your analogy is a complete failure for at least a couple of reasons.
I hate it for her and for everyone associated with her. One person could have prevented it. But she felt enough privilege that she thought she could threaten him directly and get away with it. She was wrong.
LOL...had her dog been on a leash there would have been no "threat"...which she never identified as a threat, btw. So your claim is full of shit. The only thing she bitched about was him filming her. Over and over. I suppose THAT escalated the situation, right? He should NEVER have filmed her and she wouldn't have gone ballistic. His fault.
You've never seen TJ with a bone, huh? Following him down his weird rabbit holes is entertainment...even more so these days.
In that case, answer the man’s question instead of taking a personal shot at me even though I wasn’t the one who posed the question.
His actions didn't escalate anything. At all. She admits it in her diatribe. She is ONLY concerned about his phone. Find one word of concern she speaks concerning the dog she's dragging by it's throat as she confronts him. So you either have to admit that it's being videoed that sets her off or invent BS...your specialty. And if you force yourself to make that admission, you then have to blame him for THAT escalation.
Link to her diatribe?
smh...she told him she was going to report an African American man was threatening her life while dragging her choking dog around by it's collar. Maybe it's the vocab that has you stumped.
That’s how those guys roll. When they realize they can’t refute your point, their favorite tactic is to twist your words into something you didn’t say and try to force you to defend their alternate interpretation of your point. Tarheel’s been doing that for most of the 12 years that I’ve been posting on this board.
Damn...try to keep up. FTR, I don't think EITHER of them - neither Sandmann nor C. Cooper is to blame. I'm trying to figure out how YOU or TJ can fault one but not the other. Hypocrisy.
The fact that she threatened to call the police if he didn’t stop recording her does not, in any discipline of logic, prove that she was not also upset that moments earlier he had tried to lure her dog away from her. Your reasoning skills are absolutely abysmal.
If she wasn’t upset about the “dog treat thing” then why did she yell “Don’t you touch my dog!” when he tried to offer treats to her dog?
LOL...so she DID tell him to leave her dog alone? She did threaten to tell the police that he was...somehow...threatening HER DOG? I'll let you post the transcript and point that out. Maybe just one word of concern for her choking dog as she drags it choking and struggling across the ground and confronts him?
Here's the video...
If nothing else it demonstrates that Tarheel is once again wrong about a component of this story.
Still waiting for the time stamp where she yelled "Don't touch my dog"? Again...TIA
The worst part of the video is her on the phone claiming he's threatening her and her dog as she hangs the poor pooch by it's collar and it's choking, coughing and thrashing around.
Lol. I guess 4 minutes was too long to wait for me to once again answer a question that has already been answered multiple times in this thread.
I'm well aware that she followed through on her threat to call police. My post was in response to Tarheel's reference to her 'diatribe'. And per Tarheel's definition, her 'diatribe' consisted of her threat to Cooper that she was going to call police.
What an overwhelming sense of accomplishment you must feel.
