ADVERTISEMENT

Breadbags supports water pollution

Although I do think the DM Waterworks lawsuit outcome will matter more than the WOTUS rule.

What bothers me is that breadbags and chuckles don't seem to care one bit about the absolutely horrible water quality in Iowa.

http://www.thegazette.com/subject/n...s-rule-making-issue-heading-to-court-20151106


I clicked the link and there was a stupid survey that I had to complete to read the article, and then I was distracted by the banner ad for "Russian Senior Dating for Men."

So, I never figured out who "breadbasket" and "chuckles" are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timinatoria
Branstad doesn't care. He really doesn't. Clean water does not have a place in his world of crony capitalism. He doesn't care about the poor and the indigent as they cannot to his world of crony capitalism. Branstad could give a rats-ass about the state of the State's educational system as it would mean his cronies would have to pay Iowans a higher wage and detract from their bottom line.
Terry's job is to take State revenues and turn them into private profits. He doesn't want the State's money to be used as designed (for public health, higher environmental quality or better levels of education) without first being stripped by the "private" sector.
Branstad is a real POS. The good people of Iowea deserve much, much better. However, many Iowans are getting just what they voted for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
Swing and a miss, there is nothing in the link where either one of them said they support water pollution, once again the leftwing loons swing and miss.

Show me where they support doing anything about it or any alternatives. Either one.
 
Swing and a miss, there is nothing in the link where either one of them said they support water pollution, once again the leftwing loons swing and miss.


Branstad's record as governor certainly has. He has consistantly REFUSED to adequately fund and finance the State DNR. He scoffs at their science and says the good farmers of Iowa are doing the best they can and that's all we can expect. Meanwhile, "we the people" continue tio pay higher and higher water rates as we pay the Waterworks folks to remove nitrates from our drinking water....to "safe" (but high) levels.
Lucky...the "swing and miss" on on you and your ignorance. You should Love Branstad's Ioway! "I-o-way! I-O-way! Land where the tall corn grows!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 86Hawkeye
Both are U.S. Senators and you are a nothing, keep making statements you can't back up it only makes you look foolish.
What is it called when someone gets repeatedly banned from a message board and keeps coming back under new handles? Foolish, or pure genius?
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Both are U.S. Senators and you are a nothing, keep making statements you can't back up it only makes you look foolish.

Show me anything where either one actually has issued a statement, or proposed legislation to do anything about this. We all live in castles made of sand chief....I care about what planet is left for my kids and others....Iowa's water is horrible.

Joel....I have worked with the State on this issue. While I understand the disdain for Brandstad, I don't hold them too accountable for this. The DNR pursues this pretty hard against source points like cities. Ag is the problem. I do agree that their unwillingness to even settle on measures for the voluntary programs is not good.
 
Although I do think the DM Waterworks lawsuit outcome will matter more than the WOTUS rule.

What bothers me is that breadbags and chuckles don't seem to care one bit about the absolutely horrible water quality in Iowa.

http://www.thegazette.com/subject/n...s-rule-making-issue-heading-to-court-20151106
I think it is great both our U.S. Senators are committed to preventing the EPA from making a massive power grab.

I've seen no proof there are widespread or chronic water quality issues across Iowa. Yes, the Des Moines water works issue needs to be addressed and then the Iowa legislature should debate it and propose solutions rather than a federal agency taking control and enacting policy for the entire country based on one watershed.

The system worked. Congress oversees government agencies like the EPA and can cut them down to size with legislation when they get out of hand.

If this were a year ago, Farkin would have off-set Chucks vote on this issue. Braley certainly would have as well, if he had been elected. Iowa voters spoke loud and clear that is not what they wanted.
 
Although I do think the DM Waterworks lawsuit outcome will matter more than the WOTUS rule.

What bothers me is that breadbags and chuckles don't seem to care one bit about the absolutely horrible water quality in Iowa.

http://www.thegazette.com/subject/n...s-rule-making-issue-heading-to-court-20151106
Although I do think the DM Waterworks lawsuit outcome will matter more than the WOTUS rule.

What bothers me is that breadbags and chuckles don't seem to care one bit about the absolutely horrible water quality in Iowa.

http://www.thegazette.com/subject/n...s-rule-making-issue-heading-to-court-20151106

It bothers me that she doesn't realize that people who desire clean safe water in Iowa are "the people of Iowa" too, and likely outnumber those who prefer the current polluted state of Iowa's waters.
 
I'll never understand why people who pretend to want to have serious discussions about politics continually use juvenile nicknames for politicians.

Both sides do it, and it instantly discredits the person using the nicknames. As soon and I read them I get a lesser opinion of the poster.
 
Branstad doesn't care. He really doesn't. Clean water does not have a place in his world of crony capitalism. He doesn't care about the poor and the indigent as they cannot to his world of crony capitalism. Branstad could give a rats-ass about the state of the State's educational system as it would mean his cronies would have to pay Iowans a higher wage and detract from their bottom line.
Terry's job is to take State revenues and turn them into private profits. He doesn't want the State's money to be used as designed (for public health, higher environmental quality or better levels of education) without first being stripped by the "private" sector.
Branstad is a real POS. The good people of Iowea deserve much, much better. However, many Iowans are getting just what they voted for.
I would really hope that after fifty years of shouting this stupid charge you would find another way to lie about What the right believes but alas this is all you have.
 
I think it is great both our U.S. Senators are committed to preventing the EPA from making a massive power grab.

(Personally, I think it is great that BOTH of Iowa's US Senator's believe that polluted water is no big deal in the State they represent and choose to do nothing about improving the state's water quality.)

I've seen no proof there are widespread or chronic water quality issues across Iowa. Yes, the Des Moines water works issue needs to be addressed and then the Iowa legislature should debate it and propose solutions rather than a federal agency taking control and enacting policy for the entire country based on one watershed.

(Jeeeeebus Keeerist INX.....where is your head? The last two years there have been numerous (record levels) of Iowa public closings due to "blue algae"(high phosphorus).....the DSM Waterworks has had to increase water rates because of the expensive and lengthy efforts they have to make to get their customers drinking water to "safe" levels because of nitrates from farms at the water source upstream....This has lead to the recent court case involving DSM Waterworks vs. Buena Vista/Calhoun/Sac counties.)

The system worked. Congress oversees government agencies like the EPA and can cut them down to size with legislation when they get out of hand.

(How does refusing to address the problem in any meaningful way allow the "system" to work?

If this were a year ago, Farkin would have off-set Chucks vote on this issue. Braley certainly would have as well, if he had been elected. Iowa voters spoke loud and clear that is not what they wanted.


It's bad enough Iowa has a Governor who refuses to oversee the well being of his citizens. Now you think its a great deal that the State's 2 US Senators refuse to become involves with a question that has much greater impact on the nation's water quality than just that of the State of Iowa? Sometimes I just don't understand INX how you and yours look at a problem and then decide to attack it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Show me anything where either one actually has issued a statement, or proposed legislation to do anything about this.

Why don't you show us where either of them have said that they "support water pollution".
 
I would really hope that after fifty years of shouting this stupid charge you would find another way to lie about What the right believes but alas this is all you have.
Well aflachawk, actions speak louder than words. Branstad's inaction on this issue and his consistent push back on many things Iowa DNR related should tell you something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Why don't you show us where either of them have said that they "support water pollution".

Again 86....action's speak louder than words. The governor's inaction to get the two sides together withany type of urgency tells me something. He knows by backing the DSM Waterworks into a corner like he did, will make him look good. He also sees Bill Stowe as a formidable political opponent for Iowa GOPers down the line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
I'll never understand why people who pretend to want to have serious discussions about politics continually use juvenile nicknames for politicians.

Both sides do it, and it instantly discredits the person using the nicknames. As soon and I read them I get a lesser opinion of the poster.

Lighten up Francis...this isn't a serious political forum. Its a daily cyber shouting match for entertainment only....sheesh
 
I think it is great both our U.S. Senators are committed to preventing the EPA from making a massive power grab.

I've seen no proof there are widespread or chronic water quality issues across Iowa. Yes, the Des Moines water works issue needs to be addressed and then the Iowa legislature should debate it and propose solutions rather than a federal agency taking control and enacting policy for the entire country based on one watershed.

The system worked. Congress oversees government agencies like the EPA and can cut them down to size with legislation when they get out of hand.

If this were a year ago, Farkin would have off-set Chucks vote on this issue. Braley certainly would have as well, if he had been elected. Iowa voters spoke loud and clear that is not what they wanted.

You have seen no proof? Where have you been? This article is now 10 years old, and do you know what's been done? Almost nothing to ag, thats for sure. They push on source points like waste water plants, but do nothing to ag

http://archive.desmoinesregister.co...vers-Iowa-among-nation-s-most-highly-polluted
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT