ADVERTISEMENT

Budget proposal would bar gender-affirming care under Iowa Medicaid

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
80,532
64,590
113
Deplorable:

Iowa Medicaid would no longer cover surgical, hormonal and other procedures related to treating Iowans with gender dysphoria under a budget proposal advanced by Senate Republicans.



Senate Study Bill 1237 includes a provision that states money appropriated to the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services “shall not be used for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis.”


HHS administers Iowa Medicaid, the joint federal and state program that helps cover medical costs for some Iowans with limited income and resources, including eligible low-income adults, children, pregnant women, older adults and people with disabilities.



Iowa HHS did not immediately respond to a request Wednesday for figures on how much Iowa Medicaid has paid for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis in recent years.


The move comes just months after Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed into law legislation repealing protections for transgender Iowans against discrimination in housing, employment, lending, public accommodations and more, making Iowa the first state in the nation to remove a protected class from a state’s civil rights act.


Reynolds and Republican lawmakers argued the protections in the Civil Rights Act endanger state laws they passed in recent years restricting transgender rights. That includes a 2023 law that bans physicians from prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones or authorizing surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minors under the age of 18. Under Iowa law, transgender people can no longer use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity in K-12 schools and transgender women and girls are barred from female sports.


Supporters of the legislation pointed to the Iowa courts’ determination in 2023 that the state’s previous attempt to ban Medicaid coverage for gender transition surgery was unconstitutional. A judge cited the inclusion of gender identity in the Iowa Civil Rights Act in his ruling. The court also ruled the ban violated the Iowa Constitution's equal protection clause.




Medical associations: Gender-affirming care reduces suicide attempts​


Max Mowitz, a transgender Iowan and executive director of the LGBTQ advocacy organization One Iowa, said major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Pediatric Association and the American Association of Psychiatrists — recognize gender-affirming care as medically-necessary, evidence-based care that improves the physical and mental health of transgender and gender-diverse individuals.


Forgoing such care can have tragic health consequences, Mowitz warned.


In a letter to state governors in 2021, the American Medical Association urged against limiting the practice and said gender-affirming care correlates with a reduction in mental health problems and suicide attempts.


Gender dysphoria refers to the psychological distress that can happen when a person's gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth. If left untreated, it can cause anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation, Mowitz said.


He said blocking such care under Iowa Medicaid “would put additional strain on other systems that would need to support these folks that can access the care that they need.”


“And I don't know why we would be removing access to care that is medically necessary,” Mowitz told lawmakers Wednesday.


Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa, said the language restricting access to gender-affirming care is so broad that it could prohibit mental health treatment for gender dysphoria in addition to surgery, hormone therapy and other medical interventions.


“The most common treatment for gender dysphoria is, in fact, counseling,” Crow said. “And so we're restricting access to mental health counseling for these folks who desperately need it. This is the group of folks who has the highest suicide rate in our state. … So you have two kids coming in, both need mental health care services — one is trans; one isn't. The one who isn't gets the mental health care services. The one who is doesn't. That seems completely unfair.”


Republican Sens. Mark Costello, of Imogene, and Kara Warme, of Ames, signed off to advance the bill to the full Senate Appropriations Committee for further consideration.


Costello declined to comment on the bill’s provision prohibiting Medicaid coverage of gender-affirming care.


Sen. Molly Donahue, D-Marion, the other member of the subcommittee, declined to sign off on the bill.

 
Deplorable:

Iowa Medicaid would no longer cover surgical, hormonal and other procedures related to treating Iowans with gender dysphoria under a budget proposal advanced by Senate Republicans.



Senate Study Bill 1237 includes a provision that states money appropriated to the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services “shall not be used for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis.”


HHS administers Iowa Medicaid, the joint federal and state program that helps cover medical costs for some Iowans with limited income and resources, including eligible low-income adults, children, pregnant women, older adults and people with disabilities.



Iowa HHS did not immediately respond to a request Wednesday for figures on how much Iowa Medicaid has paid for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis in recent years.


The move comes just months after Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed into law legislation repealing protections for transgender Iowans against discrimination in housing, employment, lending, public accommodations and more, making Iowa the first state in the nation to remove a protected class from a state’s civil rights act.


Reynolds and Republican lawmakers argued the protections in the Civil Rights Act endanger state laws they passed in recent years restricting transgender rights. That includes a 2023 law that bans physicians from prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones or authorizing surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minors under the age of 18. Under Iowa law, transgender people can no longer use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity in K-12 schools and transgender women and girls are barred from female sports.


Supporters of the legislation pointed to the Iowa courts’ determination in 2023 that the state’s previous attempt to ban Medicaid coverage for gender transition surgery was unconstitutional. A judge cited the inclusion of gender identity in the Iowa Civil Rights Act in his ruling. The court also ruled the ban violated the Iowa Constitution's equal protection clause.




Medical associations: Gender-affirming care reduces suicide attempts​


Max Mowitz, a transgender Iowan and executive director of the LGBTQ advocacy organization One Iowa, said major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Pediatric Association and the American Association of Psychiatrists — recognize gender-affirming care as medically-necessary, evidence-based care that improves the physical and mental health of transgender and gender-diverse individuals.


Forgoing such care can have tragic health consequences, Mowitz warned.


In a letter to state governors in 2021, the American Medical Association urged against limiting the practice and said gender-affirming care correlates with a reduction in mental health problems and suicide attempts.


Gender dysphoria refers to the psychological distress that can happen when a person's gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth. If left untreated, it can cause anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation, Mowitz said.


He said blocking such care under Iowa Medicaid “would put additional strain on other systems that would need to support these folks that can access the care that they need.”


“And I don't know why we would be removing access to care that is medically necessary,” Mowitz told lawmakers Wednesday.


Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa, said the language restricting access to gender-affirming care is so broad that it could prohibit mental health treatment for gender dysphoria in addition to surgery, hormone therapy and other medical interventions.


“The most common treatment for gender dysphoria is, in fact, counseling,” Crow said. “And so we're restricting access to mental health counseling for these folks who desperately need it. This is the group of folks who has the highest suicide rate in our state. … So you have two kids coming in, both need mental health care services — one is trans; one isn't. The one who isn't gets the mental health care services. The one who is doesn't. That seems completely unfair.”


Republican Sens. Mark Costello, of Imogene, and Kara Warme, of Ames, signed off to advance the bill to the full Senate Appropriations Committee for further consideration.


Costello declined to comment on the bill’s provision prohibiting Medicaid coverage of gender-affirming care.


Sen. Molly Donahue, D-Marion, the other member of the subcommittee, declined to sign off on the bill.

And you find this to be a problem?:oops:
 
I was told by numerous posters here that it was only about bathrooms and preserving the sanctity of guRLz spORtZ!!
They swore that as soon as this turned into gender cleansing they'd totally stand up for trans citizens. It was never, ever about bathrooms and girls sports. The goal has always been to step by step commit gender cleansing. Next will be restrictions aimed at private insurers, and care providers will be threatened with prosecution. Bigotry has always been the core of this movement.
 
Surgery and drugs should never be encouraged. You can be trans without chopping up your body and taking hormones. Someone that feels ugly goes and gets a lot of obvious plastic surgery; most of us would say that person has mental and emotional problems.
 
Why? Why do you guys always default to the extreme? I am an unabashed Christian man who finds it impossible to believe that Jesus Christ would turn his back on these people.

Would Jesus Christ have mutilated them to help make them feel better? Do you really believe that he would support cutting the dick off a child? Really? Ask yourself.
 
Just because your idol got cucked by one trans person and outed for being a deadbeat dad by another trans person doesn't mean the trans community deserves the hate you show them.

Please get some mental help

Point Up Read This GIF by Danica McKellar


Speaking of mental health...
 
Just because your idol got cucked by one trans person and outed for being a deadbeat dad by another trans person doesn't mean the trans community deserves the hate you show them.

Please get some mental help

Red herring.

This young woman was abused as a child and mutilated. Do you not have any compassion for the victims of the policies you promote?

Are you completely heartless and devoid of empathy?



@soybean any compassion here?
 
How is this deplorable? Why is the tax payer picking up cosmetic surgery bills for anyone? Are we going to pay for people to get their nose, lips, etc done for vanity projects? Cutting your dick off doesn't magically turn you into a woman, it's strictly cosmetic in nature (and often leads to horrifying results and lifelong medication requirements that are very expensive).

Tax money should never, ever go to this
 
Clementine was mutilated at 14 and psychopaths like @Tom Paris & @WDSMHAWK are the people responsible.

Freaks. You two would have fit in nicely 1937 German doctors mutilation experiment camps. Would have fit right in with those Nazi doctors. Birds of a feather.
Same people will unironically claim they care about the government wasting money then in the next breath say the tax payer should be funding optional cosmetic surgeries that have lifelong medical costs associated with them. And you're a "bad person" if you call them out for it. Insanity.
 
I can't understand why the GOP just can't help itself when it comes to persecuting human beings that they fear for some reason.
It activates people. You see it in every thread about trans citizens. You take a small, relatively powerless group and focus all of the failings of society and individuals like Northern onto them. Northern would get ahead in life if it weren't for trans citizens.
If trans citizens didn't exist, the GOP would create all of the anger for another group of citizens to exploit. Hatred is a powerful motivator.
 
Why should trans citizens pay into a program and be denied care because of your emotions? Shouldn't medical decisions be up to the health care provider and the patient? Why should I be forced to pay for the end result of your lifestyle decisions?
This is different imo. This is more on par with nose jobs and boob jobs. Do you think we should pay for those as well?
 
Why should trans citizens pay into a program and be denied care because of your emotions? Shouldn't medical decisions be up to the health care provider and the patient? Why should I be forced to pay for the end result of your lifestyle decisions?
Should I be allowed to have tax payer funded liposuction and nose jobs? I pay into the system? Give me free shit bc i want it! If you disagree you're a bigot.

Am I doing this right? You're actually insane if you believe this stupidity, lucas..
 
These are American CITIZENS...Iowa CITIZENS who are being attacked, and your bigoted ass doesn't give a damn. You don't like them because they exist.
Have you on the left lost your minds? the government can't pay for everything. If someone is over 21 and they want this type of surgery and and have the means to pay for it, they have every right to have the procedure. However, that is not something the tax payer should be paying for. Should taxpayers pay for nose jobs as well?
 
This is different imo. This is more on par with nose jobs and boob jobs. Do you think we should pay for those as well?
If the doctor says so, yes. Don't you know a woman who has had reconstructive surgery after surviving breast cancer? Are you the heartless type who denies her the mental well being of an appropriate body shape?
I seem to recall you getting pissy with me over you declaring it was only about sports and bathrooms for you. It appears you were lying. You are happy to apply your moral code to the health care decisions of other Americans. Not to punch down too hard, but you've talked about a lot of bad life decisions. Who are you to sit on high and judge another citizen? Who are you to decide over a doctor and patient what is needed?
 
This isn't even a close call. My tax dollars should not be used for this purpose.
So, not about bathrooms and sports as you have previously stated? My tax dollars get to support your kids and I have no choice in the matter, but you get to make the decisions for other citizens over the training and experience of their doctor?
When did you abandon prizing our liberties, and maintaining our rights like any good Iowan would?
 
If the doctor says so, yes. Don't you know a woman who has had reconstructive surgery after surviving breast cancer? Are you the heartless type who denies her the mental well being of an appropriate body shape?
I seem to recall you getting pissy with me over you declaring it was only about sports and bathrooms for you. It appears you were lying. You are happy to apply your moral code to the health care decisions of other Americans. Not to punch down too hard, but you've talked about a lot of bad life decisions. Who are you to sit on high and judge another citizen? Who are you to decide over a doctor and patient what is needed?
I think you miss recall. I don't remember ever saying anything about sports and bathrooms.

I don't judge anyone. I simply disagree with paying for sex changes. It's simple and reasonable. You try to make it something it is not.
 
I think you miss recall. I don't remember ever saying anything about sports and bathrooms.

I don't judge anyone. I simply disagree with paying for sex changes. It's simple and reasonable. You try to make it something it is not.
Got it. You want to run people's lives because of your hang ups, but don't have the stones to admit it.
Nah, I remember, you got plenty pissy about it. Why should I pay for your life mistake care? Why do you deny coverage to people who pay into a system? Just admit you hate certain classes of citizens. At least guys like Clarinda and Northern are open about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
The Shitlibs never learn. JD Vance will be our next President.
They are incapable of learning lol no wonder the 18 to 21 group is leaning republican plus 12 and Charlie kirk/trump are packing college campuses with excited young voters. The boomers are a dying breed (literally) and if the current trend holds true then Vance is on track to win the popular vote by an even bigger landslide in 2028 as you mention. The cult is its own worst enemy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoWokeBloke
Deplorable:

Iowa Medicaid would no longer cover surgical, hormonal and other procedures related to treating Iowans with gender dysphoria under a budget proposal advanced by Senate Republicans.



Senate Study Bill 1237 includes a provision that states money appropriated to the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services “shall not be used for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis.”


HHS administers Iowa Medicaid, the joint federal and state program that helps cover medical costs for some Iowans with limited income and resources, including eligible low-income adults, children, pregnant women, older adults and people with disabilities.



Iowa HHS did not immediately respond to a request Wednesday for figures on how much Iowa Medicaid has paid for sex reassignment surgery or treatment related to an individual’s gender dysphoria diagnosis in recent years.


The move comes just months after Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed into law legislation repealing protections for transgender Iowans against discrimination in housing, employment, lending, public accommodations and more, making Iowa the first state in the nation to remove a protected class from a state’s civil rights act.


Reynolds and Republican lawmakers argued the protections in the Civil Rights Act endanger state laws they passed in recent years restricting transgender rights. That includes a 2023 law that bans physicians from prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones or authorizing surgery for treatment of gender dysphoria for minors under the age of 18. Under Iowa law, transgender people can no longer use the bathroom that aligns with their gender identity in K-12 schools and transgender women and girls are barred from female sports.


Supporters of the legislation pointed to the Iowa courts’ determination in 2023 that the state’s previous attempt to ban Medicaid coverage for gender transition surgery was unconstitutional. A judge cited the inclusion of gender identity in the Iowa Civil Rights Act in his ruling. The court also ruled the ban violated the Iowa Constitution's equal protection clause.




Medical associations: Gender-affirming care reduces suicide attempts​


Max Mowitz, a transgender Iowan and executive director of the LGBTQ advocacy organization One Iowa, said major medical associations — including the American Medical Association, the American Pediatric Association and the American Association of Psychiatrists — recognize gender-affirming care as medically-necessary, evidence-based care that improves the physical and mental health of transgender and gender-diverse individuals.


Forgoing such care can have tragic health consequences, Mowitz warned.


In a letter to state governors in 2021, the American Medical Association urged against limiting the practice and said gender-affirming care correlates with a reduction in mental health problems and suicide attempts.


Gender dysphoria refers to the psychological distress that can happen when a person's gender identity differs from the sex assigned at birth. If left untreated, it can cause anxiety, depression and suicidal ideation, Mowitz said.


He said blocking such care under Iowa Medicaid “would put additional strain on other systems that would need to support these folks that can access the care that they need.”


“And I don't know why we would be removing access to care that is medically necessary,” Mowitz told lawmakers Wednesday.


Keenan Crow, director of policy and advocacy for One Iowa, said the language restricting access to gender-affirming care is so broad that it could prohibit mental health treatment for gender dysphoria in addition to surgery, hormone therapy and other medical interventions.


“The most common treatment for gender dysphoria is, in fact, counseling,” Crow said. “And so we're restricting access to mental health counseling for these folks who desperately need it. This is the group of folks who has the highest suicide rate in our state. … So you have two kids coming in, both need mental health care services — one is trans; one isn't. The one who isn't gets the mental health care services. The one who is doesn't. That seems completely unfair.”


Republican Sens. Mark Costello, of Imogene, and Kara Warme, of Ames, signed off to advance the bill to the full Senate Appropriations Committee for further consideration.


Costello declined to comment on the bill’s provision prohibiting Medicaid coverage of gender-affirming care.


Sen. Molly Donahue, D-Marion, the other member of the subcommittee, declined to sign off on the bill.

Seems ok
Just sayin
 
Got it. You want to run people's lives because of your hang ups, but don't have the stones to admit it.
Nah, I remember, you got plenty pissy about it. Why should I pay for your life mistake care? Why do you deny coverage to people who pay into a system? Just admit you hate certain classes of citizens. At least guys like Clarinda and Northern are open about it.
We should pay for liposuction for anorexics
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT