ADVERTISEMENT

Bulletin Board Material

HawkAttackDial911

HB Heisman
Feb 1, 2012
7,106
6,386
113
Your Mom's House
And so it begins.

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/b...le-tv-channels-and-predictions-030808721.html

THE KEY QUESTIONS

1. Who is the favorite?

The favorite is the only team to achieve any level of consistency during the regular season: Purdue. The Big Ten regular season champs finished two games ahead of the field, and finished strong by fending off Northwestern on Sunday even after locking up an outright title earlier in the week.

The Boilermakers have the conference’s best player, and are the only team in the Big Ten with an offense and defense that both rank in the top 20 nationally in adjusted efficiency. They’ve only lost once since January, and although they are by no means perfect, they’re a notch above a messy second tier at the moment.

2. Who else could win the tournament?

There are as many as six other realistic picks. Michigan is the 8-seed, but might be playing better basketball right now than anybody outside of Purdue. A win over Illinois would give the Wolverines a matchup with the Boilermakers — a team they beat just one week ago.

Wisconsin showed signs of snapping out of its funk in the second half of a 66-49 victory over Minnesota. The Golden Gophers had won eight in a row prior to the loss in Madison, though, making them a sneaky bet to give Purdue a run for its money. Maryland, Michigan State and Northwestern could easily find themselves playing on Sunday too.

3. Who got the best and worst draw?

The bottom half of the bracket looks to be weaker than the top. The average KenPom ranking of the four top-eight seeds in the upper half is 30. The average KenPom ranking of the four top-eight seeds in the lower half is 40.

Michigan in particular got an unfortunate draw. John Beilein’s team lost a four-way tiebreaker with Michigan State, Northwestern and Iowa, so it must go through Illinois, Purdue and either Michigan State or Minnesota just to get to the final.

Even Purdue, who will be favored in all of its games in D.C., would probably rather have Wisconsin’s path to the championship game than its own. Iowa (Wisconsin’s likely quarterfinal matchup) is the least threatening of the top eight seeds, and the Badgers will only have to beat one NCAA tournament team to make it to Sunday.

BUBBLE IMPLICATIONS

Michigan (20-11, 10-8, KenPom 25, RPI 49), Northwestern (21-10, 10-8, KenPom 35, RPI 48): Both the Wolverines and Wildcats are near locks. But Michigan especially could use a win over Illinois to avoid a nervous wait on Sunday evening.

Michigan State (18-13, 10-8, KenPom 50, RPI 47): After a two-loss week, the Spartans might be in a bit of trouble. At the very least, they can’t afford a second round loss to Nebraska or Penn State. With one win and then a loss to Minnesota, they’d remain on the right side of the bubble, but would be sweating through the selection show.

Illinois (18-13, 8-10, KenPom 68, RPI 57): After losing to Rutgers on Saturday, the Illini absolutely need to beat Michigan on Thursday at noon. At 18-14 with only eight Big Ten wins, they’d be a firm “out.” With a win over Michigan, they’re in contention, but still might need something — if not a win, at least a good showing — in the quarters against Purdue.

Iowa (18-13, 10-8, KenPom 65, RPI 74): The Hawkeyes have snuck through the backdoor into bubble contention, and are in a spot similar to Illinois’. They absolutely must beat Indiana on Thursday. They might need a second win over Wisconsin too.

Indiana (17-14, 7-11, KenPom 46, 81): Nope. Forget about it. The Hoosiers probably have to win the whole dang thing to secure a bid.

PLAYERS TO WATCH

1. Caleb Swanigan, F, Purdue: He’s not only the best player in the conference, he might be the best player in the country. He’s probably the best forward in the country. He’s an enthralling blend of power, skill and dexterity around the rim.

2. Ethan Happ, F, Wisconsin: Happ hasn’t been himself lately. His team has been struggling, which means the double teams have been coming harder and the kick-outs aren’t as effective. But he’s a fantastic and fascinating player, a guard in a big man’s body who leads Wisconsin in every major statistical category.

3. Bryant McIntosh, G, Northwestern: McIntosh struggled over the first half of the year, but has been at his best lately as Northwestern’s wings have struggled. He has averaged almost 19 points per game since the end of January, and broke Northwestern’s career assists record with a whole year to spare in Sunday’s loss to Purdue.

ONE BIG STORYLINE

It appears the Big Ten will get seven or eight teams in the tournament. But look up and down that list of seven or eight teams… is there anybody you’d pick to advance past the first weekend of the NCAA tournament? Maybe Purdue, but that’s about it.

Below the Boilermakers, the conference has been an untidy heap of parity — or, more accurately, mediocrity — for much of the past month. It has one week — one long weekend — to change that and save face. Can Wisconsin re-find its groove? Can Michigan continue its climb? Can Minnesota find consistent offense to match its defense? The Big Ten desperately needs to find a second candidate for an NCAA tournament run. The conference tournament is its final opportunity.
 
Iowa probably has the toughest road of anyone not needing to win 5 in 5.

The reason being is that they will most likely face 3 of 4 teams they just got done playing in Indiana, Wisconsin and Maryland on top of potentially playing Purdue in the Finals.

IF and that is a big IF Iowa can keep winning, they could end up facing all top 3 seeds in the BTT.

Only a handful of bottom half teams could even make a run where they could say they did that.

I could see Ohio State maybe pulling off a run, and of course the winner of the Iowa-Indiana game is capable of getting to the semies, though Indiana would have to turn a 180 5 times and then pull their heads out of their arses right after that in order to make such a run........
 
We've beaten both teams in the past 30 days. Neither team we play is playing very well. I like our chances to win 2 games...sorry, kiss of death.
 
Yahoo...meh.

Online writer opinions are just that, opinions. Take them with a grain of salt. The guy really provides zero real analysis about Iowa, so what exactly does he know about them?

Nothing to see here really...but remember - we've watched all 4 games, we know about the Minnesota call and it's "potential impact" - and chances are he may have not actually watched a single minute of any of the 4 games or any at all during the season.

Let it go, and hope Iowa proves out worthy - cause he is correct, Iowa MUST win against Indiana and probably also needs to beat (assuming) Wisconsin to garner "iron-clad" support as to being in.
 
That article is another waste of pixels. Fake news. :rolleyes: Unless it gives the Hawkeyes even more of a chip on their shoulders to go out and win the whole damn thing.
 
Henry looks to be still in high school

338d768.jpg
 
never . murphy was in the way couldnt see it
Exactly. No way he could have seen through Murphy's entire foot that was out of bounds to notice the three Hawks calling TO. Pitino being 5 feet on the court clearly blocked the other officials from seeing any of pleas for time out too. Makes complete sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvmyhawks
Exactly. No way he could have seen through Murphy's entire foot that was out of bounds to notice the three Hawks calling TO. Pitino being 5 feet on the court clearly blocked the other officials from seeing any of pleas for time out too. Makes complete sense.
And going to replay with under 2 minutes to go was out of the question, so what's a ref to do?
 
  • Like
Reactions: youcantguardme
Iowa probably has the toughest road of anyone not needing to win 5 in 5.

The reason being is that they will most likely face 3 of 4 teams they just got done playing in Indiana, Wisconsin and Maryland on top of potentially playing Purdue in the Finals.

IF and that is a big IF Iowa can keep winning, they could end up facing all top 3 seeds in the BTT.

Only a handful of bottom half teams could even make a run where they could say they did that.

I could see Ohio State maybe pulling off a run, and of course the winner of the Iowa-Indiana game is capable of getting to the semies, though Indiana would have to turn a 180 5 times and then pull their heads out of their arses right after that in order to make such a run........

Going to have to disagree with this. I like where we are at compared to Illinois. Michigan is really clicking right now and we would have to play Purdue on Fri instead of Wisconsin.
 
Exactly. No way he could have seen through Murphy's entire foot that was out of bounds to notice the three Hawks calling TO. Pitino being 5 feet on the court clearly blocked the other officials from seeing any of pleas for time out too. Makes complete sense.
murphys foot was out of bounds , not the whole foot and pitino was not 5 foot on the court
 
If it wasn't for the ref missing Ellingson time out in Minny, we'd have a round1 and 2 bye. Didn't really sneak anything
Yep because of the 252 Big Ten conference games played this season it was only that ONE call in that ONE game which effected the overall final standings. :(

EVERY team in the league can look back at bad calls against their team in the final minutes of a game, probably multiple games and claim "if only." For me 2 Gopher losses immediately come to mind with blatant bad calls near the very end which potentially effected the outcomes.
 
you cant review a time out call
you cant review a time out call


A foot out of bounds SHOULD be reviewable. If you can review who the ball went off, where the toe is on the 3 point line, or a flagrant foul surely the foot out of bounds not being reviewable rule should be changed and from here on out be called the "Hawkeye screw job rule". The referee in this case had 4 options of calls, foul on MN, timeout Iowa, MN foot on endline=Iowa ball, OR the one option that was CLEARLY the wrong call=jump ball.
 
A foot out of bounds SHOULD be reviewable. If you can review who the ball went off, where the toe is on the 3 point line, or a flagrant foul surely the foot out of bounds not being reviewable rule should be changed and from here on out be called the "Hawkeye screw job rule". The referee in this case had 4 options of calls, foul on MN, timeout Iowa, MN foot on endline=Iowa ball, OR the one option that was CLEARLY the wrong call=jump ball.
i agree ,should be reviewable
 
Yep because of the 252 Big Ten conference games played this season it was only that ONE call in that ONE game which effected the overall final standings. :(

EVERY team in the league can look back at bad calls against their team in the final minutes of a game, probably multiple games and claim "if only." For me 2 Gopher losses immediately come to mind with blatant bad calls near the very end which potentially effected the outcomes.
I wasn't a "bad call". The player called a time-out. And I see you used your calculator. Hmm 14 * 18 does = 252, problem is that you need to divide by 2 because 2 teams do play in every game. So the correct number of Big Ten conference games is ......126. Nice try
 
I wasn't a "bad call". The player called a time-out. And I see you used your calculator. Hmm 14 * 18 does = 252, problem is that you need to divide by 2 because 2 teams do play in every game. So the correct number of Big Ten conference games is ......126. Nice try
Every fanbase can argue a bad call or calls hurt their place in the standings genius. EVERY FANBASE. Do you not get how sad and pathetic you all sound? Whining about the refs is for losers plain and simple. Maybe getting swept by Illinois hurt you in the standings as well? Ya think???
 
Every fanbase can argue a bad call or calls hurt their place in the standings genius. EVERY FANBASE. Do you not get how sad and pathetic you all sound? Whining about the refs is for losers plain and simple. Maybe getting swept by Illinois hurt you in the standings as well? Ya think???
#1. Illinois beat the Hawks twice. I don't argue fouls.
#2. I'm not a genius, just know how to divide by 2
#3. I don't speak for other fanbases or frankly even for the Iowa fanbase, just speak for myself.
 
Maybe you'd have an NCAA bid locked up had you not lost to Memphis or to Nebraska frickin Omaha for Christ's sake. But you're probably right it probably was that one single call against the Gophers which has ruined your season. It makes perfect sense nevermind.
 
Maybe you'd have an NCAA bid locked up had you not lost to Memphis or to Nebraska frickin Omaha for Christ's sake. But you're probably right it probably was that one single call against the Gophers which has ruined your season. It makes perfect sense nevermind.

Why don't you shut up and go away. Say hi to your Mom for me tell her I'll see her later tonight.
 
Maybe you'd have an NCAA bid locked up had you not lost to Memphis or to Nebraska frickin Omaha for Christ's sake. But you're probably right it probably was that one single call against the Gophers which has ruined your season. It makes perfect sense nevermind.

The butthurt is strong with you. LOL
 
In the way of all the camera angles on the replays? He must be YUUUUUGE
what do camera angles have to do with any of this? they cant review a time out call and the foot was not noticed by any ref or any player. if a player had noticed the foot they might have reviewed it and changed the call.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT