Not true?Mr Bad Hombre should educate himself on California election practices prior to making inflammatory tweets
Whatever their practices are, do better.Mr Bad Hombre should educate himself on California election practices prior to making inflammatory tweets
It's neither better nor worse. Simply different, as everyone has their own rules of how/when people can vote, and how and when those votes are counted, and in what order.Whatever their practices are, do better.
Whatever their practices are, do better.
It isn’t just California. Let’s get the vote counted in a reasonable time. It’s not that much to ask. Other states do it.Do better at what?
The winners have been declared; what do you feel needs to be done better?
FWIW, I do not live in California; just find people's fascination with California fascinating.
Until 2020, and the mail-in ballot totals skyrocketed, this wasn't really a concern. It's both the upside/downside of how we run elections, with each state having their own rules.It isn’t just California. Let’s get the vote counted in a reasonable time. It’s not that much to ask. Other states do it.
Start counting them as they come in and don’t wait until Election Day.Until 2020, and the mail-in ballot totals skyrocketed, this wasn't really a concern. It's both the upside/downside of how we run elections, with each state having their own rules.
Sounds good. Start writing your legislator.Start counting them as they come in and don’t wait until Election Day.
Don’t live in California. But I do live in Arizona, and they have a lot of problems of their own with the election process. And no, I’m not saying elections have been stolen.Sounds good. Start writing your legislator.
Of course if we did that, republicans wouldn’t be able to cry foul.
No election system is perfect, there's always room for improvement.Don’t live in California. But I do live in Arizona, and they have a lot of problems of their own with the election process. And no, I’m not saying elections have been stolen.
It isn’t just California. Let’s get the vote counted in a reasonable time. It’s not that much to ask. Other states do it.
10 minutes. Seriously though, your state seems to have improved their process.What do you consider a reasonable time?
California has a later date so all mail-in ballots are received and counted. Do you feel mail-in ballots should be required to be received prior to election day?
Just eliminate mail in ballots.What do you consider a reasonable time?
California has a later date so all mail-in ballots are received and counted. Do you feel mail-in ballots should be required to be received prior to election day?
You realize there are states with rules that preclude this, right? So go to those states and lobby to have their rules changed to suit you. Otherwise, let them get their count right so you don't have liars claiming stolen elections.Start counting them as they come in and don’t wait until Election Day.
Any examples?Just eliminate mail in ballots.
Of course that makes it harder to cheat. Democrats like to know what the numbers are so they can fabricate the numbers needed to win late at night. That’s how you end up with massive 4:00am “mail in” ballot dumps.
Is this a joke?Just eliminate mail in ballots.
Of course that makes it harder to cheat. Democrats like to know what the numbers are so they can fabricate the numbers needed to win late at night. That’s how you end up with massive 4:00am “mail in” ballot dumps.
Democrats always keep counting until the desired outcome is reached.
Where’s the “My Pillow” guy when you need to drum up bullshit?Any examples?
Bingo!Articles like this always seem to ignore that each state has their own set of rules regarding counting ballots, when ballots can be received, etc.
Then you are saying Oregon should not hold elections? Oregon has been an exclusive “mail in ballot” state for several years....,which elections there are fraudulent SA?Just eliminate mail in ballots.
Of course that makes it harder to cheat. Democrats like to know what the numbers are so they can fabricate the numbers needed to win late at night. That’s how you end up with massive 4:00am “mail in” ballot dumps.
Is this a joke?
Colorado as well. I’m sure he has a laundry list of fraud from here too that he can shareThen you are saying Oregon should not hold elections? Oregon has been an exclusive “mail in ballot” state for several years....,which elections there are fraudulent SA?
^^^^^^That is exactly what it was. Perez wanted Iowa outta there and he schemed and plotted and put Iowa in a place impossible to succeed with a faulty vote count scheme to get the job done.Is this a situation like four years ago in Iowa where everybody blamed the state for the caucus night fiasco even though it was the DNC’s meddling that caused the problems? Or is this truly a California problem?
That 2020 situation really felt like someone forced an issue to happen so that they could get Iowa out of the lead spot. And they were successful.
Fraudulent…Pretty much all of them.Then you are saying Oregon should not hold elections? Oregon has been an exclusive “mail in ballot” state for several years....,which elections there are fraudulent SA?
Just eliminate mail in ballots.
Of course that makes it harder to cheat. Democrats like to know what the numbers are so they can fabricate the numbers needed to win late at night. That’s how you end up with massive 4:00am “mail in” ballot dumps.
It was pretty transparent. Iowa managed caucuses since the 1800s including being the first state as far back as 1972, two decades before the WWW, with no problem. Then the DNC forces some special app to report results and everything goes to heck.^^^^^^That is exactly what it was. Perez wanted Iowa outta there and he schemed and plotted and put Iowa in a place impossible to succeed with a faulty vote count scheme to get the job done.
Perezis a scoundrel.
LolFraudulent…Pretty much all of them.
So Democrats will bring multiple lawsuits, conduct FBI raids, inflict financial damage and attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot but if Trump wins Pennsylvania or Michigan by less than a thousand votes they will be like shucks I guess Trump is the next president? Really?This is why people question the time it takes to count, for those wondering. The narrative.
They believe stuff like "the democrats are cheating".
Link? Where’s @NorthernHawkeye when you need him?Fraudulent…Pretty much all of them.
So Democrats will bring multiple lawsuits, conduct FBI raids, inflict financial damage and attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot but if Trump wins Pennsylvania or Michigan by less than a thousand votes they will be like shucks I guess Trump is the next president? Really?
They will be counting, re-counting and finding votes all over the place. Oh shit here’s a 600 votes 99% for Biden that Jimmy forgot in his trunk
Sorry I don’t believe you.
Wow.So Democrats will bring multiple lawsuits, conduct FBI raids, inflict financial damage and attempt to remove a candidate from the ballot but if Trump wins Pennsylvania or Michigan by less than a thousand votes they will be like shucks I guess Trump is the next president? Really?
They will be counting, re-counting and finding votes all over the place. Oh shit here’s a 600 votes 99% for Biden that Jimmy forgot in his trunk
Sorry I don’t believe you.
This is very true.Articles like this always seem to ignore that each state has their own set of rules regarding counting ballots, when ballots can be received, etc.