ADVERTISEMENT

Cancel culture takes aim at galaxies

lonestar50

HR All-American
Sep 3, 2007
4,226
11,173
113
I didn't know siamese twins was offensive. Conjoined twins galaxy better? NGC 4567 NGC 4568 just rolls off the tongue

Distant cosmic objects such as planets, galaxies, and nebulae are sometimes referred to by the scientific community with unofficial nicknames. As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful. NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

As an initial step, NASA will no longer refer to planetary nebula NGC 2392, the glowing remains of a Sun-like star that is blowing off its outer layers at the end of its life, as the “Eskimo Nebula.” “Eskimo” is widely viewed as a colonial term with a racist history, imposed on the indigenous people of Arctic regions. Most official documents have moved away from its use. NASA will also no longer use the term “Siamese Twins Galaxy” to refer to NGC 4567 and NGC 4568, a pair of spiral galaxies found in the Virgo Galaxy Cluster. Moving forward, NASA will use only the official, International Astronomical Union designations in cases where nicknames are inappropriate.

“I support our ongoing reevaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at Headquarters, Washington. “Our goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and we’ll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that. Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value.”

Nicknames are often more approachable and public-friendly than official names for cosmic objects, such as Barnard 33, whose nickname "the Horsehead Nebula" invokes its appearance. But often seemingly innocuous nicknames can be harmful and detract from the science.

The Agency will be working with diversity, inclusion, and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences to provide guidance and recommendations for other nicknames and terms for review.

"These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them," said Stephen T. Shih, Associate Administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity at NASA Headquarters. "Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive.”
 
It seems to me NASA is off the reservation with these nicknames. For too long, indigenous people have been low man on the totem pole, so now that they are on the warpath for equality, everyone should circle the wagons and have a Pow wow about it. When there are too many chiefs and not enough Indians, you are eventually forced to be an Indian giver with some of these names.
 
what are they going to do about the name of the dog breed American Eskimo? I have been trying to convince the wife that I need another Eskie. She says that "you are f--king high". Apparently she is not a fan of the breed.
 
Things are kinda crazy. Sometimes at night I just stare up at the person in the moon and wonder how we got to this point.
It’s a rabbit

6a00e554eecbdf88330120a563d33d970c-800wi
 
I wonder what the qualifications are to become a "Diversity, Inclusion and Equity Expert" and I wonder what that job pays? I also assume white males need not apply?
 
Looks like you’re saying black holes take and take and take......whereas white holes graciously give



this is some bullshit, I’m writing a strongly worded letter to NASA’s ass
There's another interpretation also that says it's so comfortable inside black holes that nobody wants to come back out while white holes scare everything away. But it's unclear which interpretation is accepted currently.
 
ADVERTISEMENT