Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.Originally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think. Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input. This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.Originally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
You 2 are dangerously insane.Originally posted by aflachawk:
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think. Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input. This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.Originally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
So is Aflac wrong? About the glacial part anyway. Why have glaciers been disappearing for thousands of years but all of a sudden humans are the cause?Originally posted by What W...us Do?:
You 2 are dangerously insane.ÂOriginally posted by aflachawk:
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think.  Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input.  This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.ÂOriginally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
Five years from now it will be interesting to watch you guys claim to have been warning us about global warming.
Originally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.ÂOriginally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
I'd suspect that CNN show would answer this for you, but Game of Thrones is about to start so F the glaciers, winter is coming.Originally posted by SWIowahawks:
So is Aflac wrong? About the glacial part anyway. Why have glaciers been disappearing for thousands of years but all of a sudden humans are the cause?
Posted from Rivals Mobile
How many cars and coal fired power plants were there 13,000 years ago?Originally posted by aflachawk:
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think. Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input. This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.Originally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
I'm confused, are you trying to support aflac?Originally posted by lucas80:
How many cars and coal fired power plants were there 13,000 years ago?Originally posted by aflachawk:
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think. Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input. This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.Originally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
And by the next century (most likely a lot less than that), they'll be in the same boat as the rest of the world. They're just catching up.Originally posted by THE_DEVIL:
Side note-
Say what you want about China but their government does seem to have a plan for long term continuation of the country. On the other hand the US government seems to mostly be focused on the now and the future be damned.
No one is denying there are climate cycles or factors other than man that effect climate change.Originally posted by SWIowahawks:
So is Aflac wrong? About the glacial part anyway. Why have glaciers been disappearing for thousands of years but all of a sudden humans are the cause?Originally posted by What W...us Do?:
You 2 are dangerously insane.ÂOriginally posted by aflachawk:
10,000-13,000 years ago Northwest Iowa was covered with a glacier a mile think.  Glaciers started to disappear thousands of years before mankind had any input.  This news only to alarmists like you..The goal of all the climate alarmists to give more money and power to the central government not to save the planetOriginally posted by lucas80:
CNN is having a show on Sunday night about disappearing glaciers. I doubt you'll have the courage to watch.ÂOriginally posted by IMCC965:
Let. It. Go.Originally posted by What Would Jesus Do?:
If that's the region I suspect it is, it contains such vast reserves that it dwarfs - and might make irrelevant - the Middle East reservoirs.
Considering that we built our empire in substantial measure on controlling the ME oil, how will the world change if China (with or without Vietnam and the Philipines) controls these deposits?
Needless to say, if we burn even a small fraction of these reserves, the climate is toast. Badly burnt toast.
It's all bullcrap.
Five years from now it will be interesting to watch you guys claim to have been warning us about global warming.
Posted from Rivals Mobile