ADVERTISEMENT

China says at least 10 U.S. balloons have flown in its airspace since 2022

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,736
61,094
113
China’s Foreign Ministry on Monday said the United States has sent at least 10 unsanctioned balloons into Chinese airspace since last year, as the two countries feud over a Chinese airship discovered and shot down by the U.S. military this month. The United States denied the allegation.

Are you on Telegram? Subscribe to our channel for the latest updates on Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Hitting back at allegations that Beijing had used the balloon, discovered floating over the western United States, for surveillance, Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said in a press briefing that it was “common” for U.S. high-altitude balloons to fly into other countries’ airspace.

“The United States should first reflect on itself and change course, rather than slander, discredit or incite confrontation,” Wang said.
The U.S. shot 4 objects out of the sky in nine days. What to know.
The comments come after a U.S. fighter jet shot down another unknown object flying off the coast of Alaska on Friday. U.S. and Canadian officials then said a U.S. fighter jet shot down an unidentified object in Canadian airspace on Saturday. A fourth object was shot down over Lake Huron on Sunday afternoon.






When asked whether any of the other objects downed by the U.S. military had come from China, Wang declined to answer, noting only that “irresponsible remarks should not be made without clear evidence.”
The United States denied Wang’s assertion a few hours later in a White House statement describing “any claim that the US government operates surveillance balloons” over China as false.
“This is the latest example of China scrambling to do damage control. It has repeatedly and wrongly claimed the surveillance balloon it sent over the United States was a weather balloon and to this day has failed to offer any credible explanations for its intrusion into our airspace and the airspace of others,” said spokeswoman Adrienne Watson.

Beijing has repeatedly said that the balloon discovered over the United States in late January was a civilian Chinese airship for scientific research gone astray. Wang’s remarks on Monday underline Beijing’s hardening tone to an incident that has derailed months of efforts to repair worsening U.S.-China ties.


After the initial discovery of the balloon in late January, Beijing admitted the airship was Chinese and expressed “regret” that it had blown off-course. When Washington canceled a visit to Beijing by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in response to the balloon, Beijing restricted blame to “some politicians and media” in the United States for “hyping” the incident.
Beijing’s tone has since become more defensive. After a U.S. F-22 Raptor downed the airship, China claimed it was the United States that had broken with international norms by “using force.” On Monday, Wang accused the United States of being the world’s largest “surveillance empire.”
The Shanghai-based outlet The Paper reported Sunday that an unidentified object was seen flying over Qingdao and that authorities were preparing to shoot it down.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Torg and drew_hawk
0582-980339-budweiser-blimp-3d-model-max-obj-fbx.jpg


Did they look like this?
 
I have no doubt the first wave of balloons came from China.
I'd guess the last round was drunk young people with access to helium and a tiktoc account.
 
Probably Husker fans in China letting go of their lame ass balloons when their team scored.
 
Everyone knew this was going to be China's response.

Next thing is they will shoot some balloon down and claim it's a US property. I will guess it happens this week.
Since they probably used stolen US technology to make their own - and oh by the way some of the parts were reportedly sourced from the US - this is not an outlandish claim. 😉
 
  • Like
Reactions: desihawk
Since they probably used stolen US technology to make their own - and oh by the way some of the parts were reportedly sourced from the US - this is not an outlandish claim. 😉
I haven't heard it reported that some the parts were from the US. Link?
 
Back in 1960, Kennedy and Nixon debated whether there was a "missile gap."

Will the 2024 debates feature a "balloon gap"?

Clearly we can't allow a balloon gap!
these airships are quite threatening. at 60000 feet they seem inpervious, they are not easily detected, can apparently hover about in near space in the vicinity of target areas. put a hypersonic missile on them and it’s a similar or worse situation than the cuban missile crisis.
 
these airships are quite threatening. at 60000 feet they seem inpervious, they are not easily detected, can apparently hover about in near space in the vicinity of target areas. put a hypersonic missile on them and it’s a similar or worse situation than the cuban missile crisis.
That's a reasonable concern, I think. Anyone have a counter argument?

Also sounds like a perfect device for someone to distribute radioactive material - a slow-moving dirty bomb, so to speak.

The good news is that the world is running out of helium. I used to think that was a bad thing and have been a little upset that no one seems to care. But maybe it's a good thing.

Not kidding. Google it.
 
these airships are quite threatening. at 60000 feet they seem inpervious, they are not easily detected, can apparently hover about in near space in the vicinity of target areas. put a hypersonic missile on them and it’s a similar or worse situation than the cuban missile crisis.
Or a virus.
 
That's a reasonable concern, I think. Anyone have a counter argument?

Also sounds like a perfect device for someone to distribute radioactive material - a slow-moving dirty bomb, so to speak.

The good news is that the world is running out of helium. I used to think that was a bad thing and have been a little upset that no one seems to care. But maybe it's a good thing.

Not kidding. Google it.
I remember learning that about helium in high school. And you can still just get helium balloons at the dollar store for birthday parties. Always kinda baffled me. I'm sure it's negligible amount but it's like if you were encouraged to buy jugs of gasoline to dump on the concrete
 
Step 1: We didn’t do it

Step 2: We’re angry at your response and it’s illegal

Step 3: What you do is worse

Gosh. Who does that sound like?

Just a few days away from “everybody does it”
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT