I saw the messages. I didn't see anything I wouldn't expect from a group of entitled kids. Definitely some crude and uncalled-for language, definitely embarrassing. But I don't see it as suspension worthy.
You only saw some of the messages. The student newspaper reported that the most demeaning messages were withheld because they identified people.I saw the messages. I didn't see anything I wouldn't expect from a group of entitled kids. Definitely some crude and uncalled-for language, definitely embarrassing. But I don't see it as suspension worthy.
Um, these were private text messages. How'd they get out into the public?
And not condoning anything these kids were messaging, but they are censoring what kids say in private now?
I get so tired of this phony indignation. Anything that a boy/man does is inappropriate and needs to be punished in the eyes of many in academia. Next we will be hearing about how can anyone ever send their kid to Columbia. Do the people at these universities have nothing better to do than micro manage everyone?I saw the messages. I didn't see anything I wouldn't expect from a group of entitled kids. Definitely some crude and uncalled-for language, definitely embarrassing. But I don't see it as suspension worthy.
So you don't see anything wrong with this situation at all?I get so tired of this phony indignation. Anything that a boy/man does is inappropriate and needs to be punished in the eyes of many in academia. Next we will be hearing about how can anyone ever send their kid to Columbia. Do the people at these universities have nothing better to do than micro manage everyone?
While this is indeed very true I would hope that as a society we act on these matters not to avoid lawsuits but because this kind of behavior is just flat out wrongMy reaction to events of this nature (messages through social media that are lewd, racist, provocative) and involve noteworthy public figures (i.e. intercollegiate wrestlers) is that it puts the university/college/institution at legal risk. Witness the recent cancellation of the Harvard soccer season. In the northern suburbs of Chicago (my home) lawsuits against several school districts involving racial slurs resulted in million dollar settlements against the district. School administrators must act on these incendiary/insulting behaviors or end up in court. Intercollegiate wrestling is not immune to “predicaments” like this. It’s a rough world out there.
"It's just locker room talk"They learned that if the president elect can do it, so can they.
Want to buy some snake oil? You can take it to the safe zone and it will keep you safe. I know many are sore over the recent election, there are other forums you can cry on.They learned that if the president elect can do it, so can they.
In my opinion the sensitive pansy crybabies protesting over every little thing is what woke up the rest of America. Thank god for those snowflakes.They learned that if the president elect can do it, so can they.
I thought about saying something mean, but I'll refrain. Locker room talk isn't offensive to most."It's just locker room talk"
Words and no actions shouldn't warrant a season suspension. Stupid yes, blacklisted no. I believe you were the same guy who supported some idiot for boasting about how he was going to kneel during the national anthem at the home hawk meets.So just to clarify there are people here who believe there was no wrong doing by any of these wrestlers involved?
I am definitely not condoning hate speech or what these wrestlers did although I would like to see the content and interpretation thereof. Just saying it should be a two way street and I'm betting this is mostly about social engineering up PC street knowing the history of Columbia. What's next looking at all wrestler's twitter pages ?So just to clarify there are people here who believe there was no wrong doing by any of these wrestlers involved?
Well I'll start with the kneeling thing. You must have me confused with someone else because I don't remember saying such a thing nor do I remember A conversation about someone kneeling at a match. When you are an athlete you represent the school you are attending and are held to a high standard. Who ever is involved in this absolutely did not represent their institution in a positive manner. Now why would potential students want to attend Columbia university now knowing these are the type of people they could potentially encounter on campus? The same way those wrestlers misrepresented the Minnesota program and university, the same way a select few of Iowa wrestlers misrepresented the Iowa program and university when they went out to steal from people's garages, and the same way certain Penn State wrestlers misrepresented the PSU program and school on different instances these wrestlers have misrepresented the Columbia program and university in the way they decided to speak. the group chat appears to be one that was made for the wrestling team which I am guessing is the reason the entire program is under investigation and their season is currently suspended.Words and no actions shouldn't warrant a season suspension. Stupid yes, blacklisted no. I believe you were the same guy who supported some idiot for boasting about how he was going to kneel during the national anthem at the home hawk meets.
Do you remember the Minnesota athletes doing and selling drugs? Those are actions and I believe they get to wrestle after Christmas.
Using the N word to describe people doesn't exactly come off as anything involving being pc. This also hasn't been the first time something like this has happened as there was a Kent state wrestler who was removed from the team after making some distasteful comments on TwitterI am definitely not condoning hate speech or what these wrestlers did although I would like to see the content and interpretation thereof. Just saying it should be a two way street and I'm betting this is mostly about social engineering up PC street knowing the history of Columbia. What's next looking at all wrestler's twitter pages ?
calling a guy that works two jobs, works until after dark taking in crops, owns a gun, goes to church, a "deplorable" is just as offensive to me as the N word. Not condoning the N word. I assure you no one was suspended for using "deplorable".Using the N word to describe people doesn't exactly come off as anything involving being pc
Not sure I agree , back when I was in a locker room most of what was said would have been offensive to 99% of the people out of the locker room. I hope that wasn't unusual , that was a long time ago.I thought about saying something mean, but I'll refrain. Locker room talk isn't offensive to most.
I don't completely agree with the sentiment given the history of the word but I understand what you're saying. that however has nothing to do with what is going on at Columbia and why their season has been suspendedcalling a guy that works two jobs, works until after dark taking in crops, owns a gun, goes to church, a "deplorable" is just as offensive to me as the N word. Not condoning the N word. I assure you no one was suspended for using "deplorable".
He wasn't the guy.Words and no actions shouldn't warrant a season suspension. Stupid yes, blacklisted no. I believe you were the same guy who supported some idiot for boasting about how he was going to kneel during the national anthem at the home hawk meets.
Do you remember the Minnesota athletes doing and selling drugs? Those are actions and I believe they get to wrestle after Christmas.
No...not unusual at all in my day. I graduated hs in 1990 so I'm sure a lot has changed in the locker room these days.Not sure I agree , back when I was in a locker room most of what was said would have been offensive to 99% of the people out of the locker room. I hope that wasn't unusual , that was a long time ago.
It matters if the context of the text is Columbia's interpretation of "lewd and racist" is supporting Trump or bashing Hillary and liberals. I haven't seen the context. I will believe it when I see it.I don't completely agree with the sentiment given the history of the word but I understand what you're saying. that however has nothing to do with what is going on at Columbia and why their season has been suspended
I'm pretty sure the interpretation was what was said about women specifically and using the N word nothing elseIt matters if the context of the text is Columbia's interpretation of "lewd and racist" is supporting Trump or bashing Hillary and liberals. I haven't seen the context. I will believe it when I see it.
link ?I'm pretty sure the interpretation was what was said about women specifically and using the N word nothing else
There is none do you have one that says it has anything to do remotely with the election?link ?