ADVERTISEMENT

Congress stripped IRS of another $20 billion in government shutdown fight

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
78,988
61,588
113
Deplorable:

Congress revoked an additional $20 billion from the Internal Revenue Service last week when lawmakers averted a government shutdown, a cut that may undo many of President Joe Biden’s efforts to improve customer service at the tax agency and train fresh scrutiny on wealthy tax cheats.

Biden and congressional Democrats gave the IRS $80 billion in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, but Congress rescinded $20 billion as part of a 2023 budget deal. Shortly afterward, Republicans vowed they’d be back for more IRS cuts.

And because of the way lawmakers extended government funding into March, an additional $20 billion in cuts came automatically.
When Congress approved a stopgap funding bill, called a continuing resolution, all the existing policy from the previous fiscal year was carried forward unless new text was specifically added to the bill to change it. There was no language in the bill to undo last year’s cut, so it repeated in the new law.


Critics of the IRS were pleased.

“We obviously think the increased money from the [Inflation Reduction Act] for IRS agents was a declared shakedown on taxpayers to pay for Democrats’ spending,” said Michael Palicz, director of tax policy for the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform. “Republicans have taken a huge chunk out of this before, and we have a chance to do that again.”
But Biden administration officials said the additional cuts would add $140 billion to the national debt over the next decade by hamstringing the agency’s ability to audit wealthy individuals and large corporations.
The agency will conduct 400 fewer audits of major businesses each year, Biden administration officials said, and 1,200 fewer audits of high-income individuals.

More cuts would also force the IRS to dramatically reduce customer service for taxpayers, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said last month. By 2026, the IRS would have enough resources to answer only two of every 10 phone calls to customer helplines, and wait times would increase to 28 minutes on average.

ADVERTISING

“Not only would you be in a position where we don’t have the money to go after the people who are trying to deliberately cheat and not pay their taxes, but we also wouldn’t have the resources to help the people who are trying to pay their taxes and make it more efficient,” Adeyemo said.

The new money from the Inflation Reduction Act funding vastly improved the IRS’s operations, according to the agency’s inspector general. Before the additional resources kicked in, the agency had a mountain of 24 million backlogged paper tax returns; within a year of receiving the funding boost, that was almost eradicated, the agency reported.

In the 2022 filing season, months before Congress approved the law, only 10 percent of taxpayer phone calls were ever connected to a live representative — if callers stayed on the line through sometimes hours-long waits. The IRS now answers more than 85 percent of taxpayer calls with a wait of less than three minutes, Adeyemo said.

 
Deplorable:

Congress revoked an additional $20 billion from the Internal Revenue Service last week when lawmakers averted a government shutdown, a cut that may undo many of President Joe Biden’s efforts to improve customer service at the tax agency and train fresh scrutiny on wealthy tax cheats.

Biden and congressional Democrats gave the IRS $80 billion in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, but Congress rescinded $20 billion as part of a 2023 budget deal. Shortly afterward, Republicans vowed they’d be back for more IRS cuts.

And because of the way lawmakers extended government funding into March, an additional $20 billion in cuts came automatically.
When Congress approved a stopgap funding bill, called a continuing resolution, all the existing policy from the previous fiscal year was carried forward unless new text was specifically added to the bill to change it. There was no language in the bill to undo last year’s cut, so it repeated in the new law.


Critics of the IRS were pleased.

“We obviously think the increased money from the [Inflation Reduction Act] for IRS agents was a declared shakedown on taxpayers to pay for Democrats’ spending,” said Michael Palicz, director of tax policy for the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform. “Republicans have taken a huge chunk out of this before, and we have a chance to do that again.”
But Biden administration officials said the additional cuts would add $140 billion to the national debt over the next decade by hamstringing the agency’s ability to audit wealthy individuals and large corporations.
The agency will conduct 400 fewer audits of major businesses each year, Biden administration officials said, and 1,200 fewer audits of high-income individuals.

More cuts would also force the IRS to dramatically reduce customer service for taxpayers, Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo said last month. By 2026, the IRS would have enough resources to answer only two of every 10 phone calls to customer helplines, and wait times would increase to 28 minutes on average.

ADVERTISING

“Not only would you be in a position where we don’t have the money to go after the people who are trying to deliberately cheat and not pay their taxes, but we also wouldn’t have the resources to help the people who are trying to pay their taxes and make it more efficient,” Adeyemo said.

The new money from the Inflation Reduction Act funding vastly improved the IRS’s operations, according to the agency’s inspector general. Before the additional resources kicked in, the agency had a mountain of 24 million backlogged paper tax returns; within a year of receiving the funding boost, that was almost eradicated, the agency reported.

In the 2022 filing season, months before Congress approved the law, only 10 percent of taxpayer phone calls were ever connected to a live representative — if callers stayed on the line through sometimes hours-long waits. The IRS now answers more than 85 percent of taxpayer calls with a wait of less than three minutes, Adeyemo said.

BAU for the tax cheats.
 
I'll never understand why people would push to underfunded the agency in charge of collecting taxes.
It's like everything else - starve it for years of adequate funding, then complain about inefficient government bureaucracies, then use that as an excuse to reduce funding (waste) even more.

The lies that were pushed about the additional IRS funding Biden pushed thru were especially egregious.
 
Simplify the tax code and the entire IRS could be operated with 10% of the current staff,... It's stupid.

Then simplify the tax code - but it will still require funding to enforce whatever you come up with.

FWIW, I've worked for close to 40 years in the tax world. In that time, I can think of a total of four people I've known personally that truly felt the wrath of the IRS; I only had sympathy for one.

First was a guy I knew who spent a couple of years in prison for tax fraud; it was in the early years of electronic filing, he put together a couple of dummy W2s to he and his wife from his small business (a construction company). They showed a decent amount of wages, with ridiculously high amounts of income tax withheld so it created a huge refund. He filed it himself, got the refund, and eventually got caught. He absolutely deserved jail time.

Another was a guy who got wrapped up in the "sovereign citizen" and "income tax is unconstitutional" BS. His wife eventually came to me to help straighten out the disaster he'd brought on their financial lives. He didn't go to jail, but they did live in damn-near poverty for a few years because his earnings were levied. Again, he brought it all on himself.

A third was a guy who stole about a million dollars through fraudulent PPP claims during covid.

The only one for whom I felt sympathy was a lady who'd gotten divorced from a guy with high income. As part of finalizing the divorce, a chunk of money from his retirement account was transferred to her name, then withdrawn from the account, with the money being used to pay legal fees incurred during the divorce battle. Unfortunately, she didn't realize that this would be taxable to her (AND include an additional 10% penalty since she was under age 59.5). She didn't get any of the money - it got divvied up by their lawyers - but she did get a huge tax bill. I very much felt sorry for her - not because of anything that the IRS did (their position was correct) but because she relied on advice from attorneys who clearly were more worried about their fee getting paid than they were about their client.
 
10 years ago, the IRS came after us.

They rarely go after the big earners, it’s usually the middle ground.

I also had to deal with them being a treasurer for a 501c3.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT