ADVERTISEMENT

Conservatives reveal their incredible hypocrisy via these Minneapolis police stories...

YOU CANNOT CARRY A FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE! You are bad at this.

Since Castile was under the influence of marijuana, his permit not carry is now void.

You don't KNOW that. The level of THC was deemed inadmissible AND there was never verification of this report OR an independent autopsy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
And where was his pocket located, relative to his lap?

So when Santa had you climb on his lap you climbed in his pocket? Okaaaaaaaaay.

5fabc5b20bcaabbd92b1c38dee82596a.gif
 
You don't KNOW that. The level of THC was deemed inadmissible AND there was never verification of this report OR an independent autopsy.

Castile's gf admitted to smoking that day and were regular "smokers". That which was also lied about on Castile's permit to carry application. But continue on and pretend that he was just a law abiding citizen gunned down for being black and following the law.


http://m.startribune.com/castile-s-...ew-of-st-anthony-police-department/406585886/
 
What difference does that make? They guy declared he had a gun and then started reaching for his pockets. Dumbass thing to do.

Like jumping in front of two police, in the dead of night, after a loud bang in an alley? Are we blaming the victims now?

It may have been dumb, but not getting killed dumb. How many cop killers tell the cops they are strapping while guns are drawn? :rolleyes:
 
No he wasn't. He was on the passenger side window looking into the car. You can see it in the video and he testified to it under oath.

He testified that he had a better view than Yanez?

Here is the video which people can judge for themselves who had a better view. Here's a hint, it's not Yanez's partner.

His partner is at the back tire and appears to be half paying any sort of attention until he runs off when the shots go off. There is no way in hell that he can see Castile's right hand from his angle without X-ray vision.


 
Last edited:
I know ZERO people who thinks those are interchangeable statements. "On the lap" implies it was outside the pocket. You know that.
A use of force expert conducted tests sitting in the driver's seat of Castile's car and testified during the trial that it takes an average of about 0.3 seconds to pull the gun out of that pocket. That's considerably less time than it would take to pull it out if it was sitting in the glove compartment or under his seat or in the trunk, wouldn't you say?
 
A use of force expert conducted tests sitting in the driver's seat of Castile's car and testified during the trial that it takes an average of about 0.3 seconds to pull the gun out of that pocket. That's considerably less time than it would take to pull it out if it was sitting in the glove compartment or under his seat or in the trunk, wouldn't you say?

The expert hired by the defense testified favorably for the defense?
 
Like jumping in front of two police, in the dead of night, after a loud bang in an alley? Are we blaming the victims now?

It may have been dumb, but not getting killed dumb. How many cop killers tell the cops they are strapping while guns are drawn? :rolleyes:

Who's guns were drawn when Castile told Yanez he was carrying? No one's. How many people continue reaching towards their weapon when a cop tells them not to? How many people drive around stoned? Of the driving around stoned, with weed in the car, do it with a small child in the backseat? I see a pattern of great decisions being made here.
 
The expert hired by the defense testified favorably for the defense?

Was this similar to the expert witness who testified on the prosecution behalf who said that you can't tell when someone with high levels of THC in their system last smoked or how it affected them?
 
Who's guns were drawn when Castile told Yanez he was carrying? No one's. How many people continue reaching towards their weapon when a cop tells them not to? How many people drive around stoned? Of the driving around stoned, with weed in the car, do it with a small child in the backseat? I see a pattern of great decisions being made here.

I for one find it encouraging that iahawks10 requires all gun owners to remove their 2A protected arms from their person and nearby reach when they have drank alcohol.

I'm surprised that this is his stance, but he's posted it essentially a dozen times, so he must believe it strongly.

Even for law enforcement off duty, at the bar and without a firearm, otherwise just slowly criminal at risk to be put down by other LEOs.
 
Who's guns were drawn when Castile told Yanez he was carrying? No one's. How many people continue reaching towards their weapon when a cop tells them not to? How many people drive around stoned? Of the driving around stoned, with weed in the car, do it with a small child in the backseat? I see a pattern of great decisions being made here.

I see a lot of assumptions being made here. Now are you going to play that game with Justine Damond?

I understand the verdict in the Castile case, but legal innocence does not mean it was done right.
 
I for one find it encouraging that iahawks10 requires all gun owners to remove their 2A protected arms from their person and nearby reach when they have drank alcohol.

I'm surprised that this is his stance, but he's posted it essentially a dozen times, so he must believe it strongly.

Even for law enforcement off duty, at the bar and without a firearm, otherwise just slowly criminal at risk to be put down by other LEOs.

I'm encouraged by the law. I did not write the laws, I just try and follow them the best that I can. I encourage others to do the same.

I also recommend that you remove your 2A protected firearm and nearby reach when you enter a bank, casino, or most government buildings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gimmered
I'm encouraged by the law. I did not write the laws, I just try and follow them the best that I can. I encourage others to do the same.

I also recommend that you remove your 2A protected firearm and nearby reach when you enter a bank, casino, or most government buildings.

So you do agree with LEOs disarming everyone in, say, a Texas bar right?

I think you should run for office on that platform.
 
I see a lot of assumptions being made here. Now are you going to play that game with Justine Damond?

I understand the verdict in the Castile case, but legal innocence does not mean it was done right.

But I thought you were upset because people were siding with Damond and not Castile. Now you'll be upset if I don't side with Damond? I'm in a no win position with you guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gimmered
So you do agree with LEOs disarming everyone in, say, a Texas bar right?

I can't speak for Texas, it's a little backwards in some places down there. You want to talk about Iowa?

In Iowa, anyone can carry a firearm in a bar. Not illegal. Once you start consuming alcohol, whether in a bar or anywhere else in public, it becomes illegal to possess a firearm. That goes for everybody, including police.

It used to say it right on the professional permit to carry "Void when consuming drugs or alcohol".
 
But I thought you were upset because people were siding with Damond and not Castile. Now you'll be upset if I don't side with Damond? I'm in a no win position with you guy.

I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the inconsistency in trating these two cops aND suspects differently. You either side with cops or the victims. Anything else reveals a bias or agenda.
 
I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the inconsistency in trating these two cops aND suspects differently. You either side with cops or the victims. Anything else reveals a bias or agenda.

The point you're missing here is that these two are completely different scenarios. Most people can see that and agree to it. One is a week old with very few details released, the other is over a year old and all cases are closed criminally and civilly.

I haven't "sided" with anyone in the most recent incident. But it seems to me that the only person bringing race into this is you.
 
There's certainly some controversy about how many times he's found justified use of force.
Again, was his testimony false?

I don't give a rat's ass how many times or for whom he has testified in the past. The issue here is accessible was the gun for Castile and how quickly could he pull it out.

Was the man's testimony on that issue false?
 
Right now, I believe the cop who shot the woman was wrong, but we'll have to wait for the investigation to be completed.

The investigation which they won't believe because they apparently investigate themselves. Or not really investigate themselves, but police investigating police. So it's the same thing they've said. Ask them who should investigate officer involved shootings, but they won't give you an answer.
 
I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the inconsistency in trating these two cops aND suspects differently. You either side with cops or the victims. Anything else reveals a bias or agenda.

So by your logic, you believe that everyone who is shot by police is the victim. There has never been a justifiable police shooting. You either side with the police or with the suspect. Otherwise you're a hypocrite.
 
LOL. You are insame
When Philando Castille is shot it was his own fault for spooking the officer. Now Justine Damond is shot and it was the cop's fault, he should have waited and not used deadly force. I wonder what was different about the two victims here? Things that make you go, "hmmmmmmmmmm."

Hey, how about both sides let the investigators do their jobs first, instead of injecting biased narratives in beforehand? Can we all be cool with that?
LOL. You are insane. Sadly, you teach for a living. Scary AF
 
  • Like
Reactions: iahawks10
I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the inconsistency in trating these two cops aND suspects differently. You either side with cops or the victims. Anything else reveals a bias or agenda.
This is the problem with partisan hacks in a nutshell. You see the world as black and white. The idea that something can exist outside of your all or nothing world view does not compute.
 
Has yhe right rioted in mpls and all over the country over this?

Wanna see who is hypocritical...just look at the way the left handled both shootings
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamesvanderwulf
ADVERTISEMENT