You want to know how everyone can tell that you've lost the argument and have no leg to stand on?
Are you going to talk about non-answers, like yours that I quoted?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You want to know how everyone can tell that you've lost the argument and have no leg to stand on?
I for one find it encouraging that iahawks10 requires all gun owners to remove their 2A protected arms from their person and nearby reach when they have drank alcohol.
I'm surprised that this is his stance, but he's posted it essentially a dozen times, so he must believe it strongly.
#benghazi
#IRS
#fast and furious
I never said the two are interchangeable. It's sort of like how all toads are frogs but not all frogs are toads.I know ZERO people who thinks those are interchangeable statements. "On the lap" implies it was outside the pocket. You know that.
I'm wondering if anyone actually believes Castille was about to shoot that officer? There is another thread about what levels of inherent risk our police should be responsible for accepting before shooting people. Since we have so many people carrying guns, I'd like to think the bar for shooting a citizen was higher than how fast a person is able to draw and fire a weapon. By that logic, we're all in danger everywhere we go everyday. You shoot someone and just say they were going for their gun and could have killed me in less than a second?
If someone is carrying and their hand "goes for their gun," you can shoot them? No verbal threat, "I'm going to kill you," "you're a dirty cheater." When was the last time a killer told someone he had a gun before he went to draw and shoot? Billy the Kid? Seems like the threshold for a legal shootin was higher in tombstone than for police in Minneapolis.
I never said the two are interchangeable. It's sort of like how all toads are frogs but not all frogs are toads.
If your pocket is in your lap and something is in your pocket then that item is both in your pocket and in your lap. But the item can be in your lap without being in your pocket.
That's a fairly complicated concept for someone of your intellect so I don't expect you to fully grasp it.
Try to think of it this way - if Mrs. Menace Sockeyes has her hand in some dude's front pants pocket then is it also safe to say her hand is in his lap?
That's a lot of mental gymnastics for such simple BS.
Yep, THOSE were why your narratives were so different for so similar an incident. Thanks for clearing that up, Fuhrer.
I'll try and slow it down some. The gun was in his lap. The gun does not have to be exposed to still be considered in someone's lap.
lap1
lap/
noun
- 1.
the flat area between the waist and knees of a seated person.
"come and sit on my lap"
synonyms: knee, knees, thighs
I am pointing out the hypocrisy of the inconsistency in trating these two cops aND suspects differently. You either side with cops or the victims. Anything else reveals a bias or agenda.
The gun was in his pocket. Two officers and a paramedic testified to this this fact. The gun was not in his lap. Period
The gun was in his pocket. Two officers and a paramedic testified to this this fact. The gun was not in his lap. Period
He was told not to reach for that area of his body. He still did so. That will get you shot every time, regardless of what or who you are.
So therefore it couldn't be in his lap?
It was in his pocket. Three govt employees testified to this in the trial
I'm not disagreeing with that. Even in his pocket, it can still be in his lap (the flat area between the waist and knees.). Keep up guy.
He was told not to reach for that area of his body. He still did so. That will get you shot every time, regardless of what or who you are.
A gun cannot both be in someone's pocket and on their lap at the same time. The gun was in his pocket. It was not on his lap or between his legs. Period
Oh really? Because right now I have a pack of gum in my pocket, which is resting on my lap. But you say that's impossible.
That has nothing to do with someone saying the gun was on his lap when it was in his pocket
You are just playing games. When people say something is on their lap the commonly understood meaning, among non-knuckledraggers, is that it is on their lap outside of their clothes.
The gun was in his pocket. It was at no time visible to the policeman
You are just playing games. When people say something is on their lap the commonly understood meaning, among non-knuckledraggers, is that it is on their lap outside of their clothes.
The gun was in his pocket. It was at no time visible to the policeman
This isn't true. My cop friends have a million stories about people not following directions. People get really nervous around cops and its common that they ignore directions because they have already started to just grab their license or registration or whatever. There were other factors involved, and anyone who doesn't admit that his age and the color of his skin weren't factors just isn't being honest. If it were a 65 year old white lady would she be dead? A 16 year old girl?He was told not to reach for that area of his body. He still did so. That will get you shot every time, regardless of what or who you are.
You're trying to make this a black and white situation regarding two separate incidents that are nowhere near being close to the same.
The bias and agenda that's being revealed is yours.
Doesn't have to be visible. Castile stated that he had it, and stated where it was. If you, as a police officer, wait for someone to make a weapon visible before reacting.....after they tell you that they have it? You just signed your own death certificate.
Doesn't have to be visible. Castile stated that he had it, and stated where it was. If you, as a police officer, wait for someone to make a weapon visible before reacting.....after they tell you that they have it? You just signed your own death certificate.
The police have shown us through their actions that this is handled completely differently depending on skin color. If this driver was white he could have reached all over the place even after telling the cop that he had a gun.
Shaun King has two examples from Cincinnati police how they handle the same dangerous situation very differently based on skin color
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...le-standards-black-men-face-article-1.2537271
Again, cop killers calmly tell officers they have a gun on them beforehand? Listen to yourself.
This isn't true. My cop friends have a million stories about people not following directions. People get really nervous around cops and its common that they ignore directions because they have already started to just grab their license or registration or whatever. There were other factors involved, and anyone who doesn't admit that his age and the color of his skin weren't factors just isn't being honest. If it were a 65 year old white lady would she be dead? A 16 year old girl?
Maybe once we can all agree that race plays a factor in how police handle situations, we can move on to a productive conversation about how to address this. For instance, there are more instances of police being murdered by 20 to 40 something black men than being murdered by 16 year old girls. Based on this, wouldn't it be human nature to be more on edge when pulling over a black man in a high crime neighborhood of Minneapolis than a 16 year old girl in a tiny Midwest town? Of course.
NOW, what do we do to help police do their job safely AND help reduce the unnecessary death of citizens? I don't have the answer, but I wish both of these citizens were alive today.
So because they handled a situation that way in Cincinnati, that automatically makes it so in Minneapolis? By a minority police officer?
Wait...was he a white or brown hispanic?
NOW, what do we do to help police do their job safely AND help reduce the unnecessary death of citizens? I don't have the answer, but I wish both of these citizens were alive today.
Awesome. That's a fine we differ on that. I'm addressing the hypocrites here who suddenly weren't so "Blue Lives Matter" in the Damond case. Really "interesting" why. I have no idea your take on that.
Again, cop killers calmly tell officers they have a gun on them beforehand? Listen to yourself.
I have an idea. You probably won't like it though.
Remain calm. Follow the officer's instructions. Keep your hands visable and don't make any sudden/jerky moves. Put as much light on as possible (dome/reading lights). Obey the law, especially when it comes to carrying weapons. Don't lie on your permit to carry application.
This will help, but it won't end police shooting people. Police F up.
“The officer got too close to the passenger’s window. If I thought he was a robbery suspect, I would have had my hand on my gun. The tactics were a little laissez-faire if you thought you were dealing with an armed robbery suspect.” — Garry F. McCarthy, a former Chicago police superintendent
“If Officer Yanez had a reasonable belief that Mr. Castile was a suspect in an armed robbery, he should have employed a high-risk car stop, and to do otherwise would be inconsistent with generally accepted police practices.” — Jeffrey J. Noble, a former California police officer who testified on behalf of the prosecution in Minnesota, in a report on Mr. Castile’s death
“That’s where the officer has to freeze it and get everything to stop. Oh, there’s a gun involved now. Let’s reframe the situation and make it safe for everybody.” — David A. Klinger, professor of criminology and criminal justice at the University of Missouri-St. Louis and a former Los Angeles police officer
“You go into the head of the driver, and he’s apparently trying to be honest and straightforward. He was probably thinking, ‘I’ll be a good guy and show the officer my carry card, and this will all be over.’ What was happening in the officer’s mind was different. Maybe the officer thought he was going for the gun.” — Geoffrey P. Alpert, professor at the University of South Carolina who studies high-risk police activity and police violence
“The victim did everything right, everything he was supposed to do. The victim was very respectful, very polite, letting the officer know what he was doing. None of that made a difference.” — Paul Butler, law professor at Georgetown University and former federal prosecutor
My take on this most recent event? The cop is not talking and lawyering up. Even his partner stated that he has no idea why this guy fired his weapon. Why did this cop reach across his partner and fire at the person who called 911...which HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED THAT SHE WAS THE COMPLAINANT.
This was intentional. And I don't know a single police officer that I know, who defends this guys actions, due to that his actions fly in the face of everything they are trained on for this type of call.
The MPLS Police Chief was right......this was manslaughter. And I have a feeling that it "may" have been premeditated.
However, I will wait for the facts before i say what I think should happen.
His partner corroborated that they had just been spooked by a loud noise and thought they were being ambushed, but I agree this was probably manslaughter too. But yeah, I will wait for the facts too. That's my point. Interesting which way the assumptions break.
It is all across the country and the disparity is with the skin color of the subject, not the officer.
White people who point guns at cops and don't get killed
Here are 8 white people who pointed guns at police officers — and didn’t get killed
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/her...guns-at-police-officers-and-didnt-get-killed/
White Man in California Shoots at Cops With Gun, Gets Shot With Beanbags and Arrested
http://www.complex.com/life/2016/08/white-man-california-shoots-at-cops-gets-shot-beanbags-arrested
You're trying to this a "black and white" answer. Sorry, but that definitely is not even remotely a fact.
So what about the 450+ white people that were killed by police last year?. 8 incidents is not a healthy sampling. Nor does it prove bias. Each incident is different on it's own. None of them are the same exact incident. Some of these are also "suicide by cop" events. Police ARE trained to react differently when this is a possibility.
You're trying to this a "black and white" answer. Sorry, but that definitely is not even remotely a fact.
Except that it is very much a black and white issue. Police regularly handle the same circumstances completely differently depending the race of the subject.