ADVERTISEMENT

Covid narrative falling apart....

your_master5

HR Heisman
Gold Member
Dec 15, 2002
5,133
2,437
113
From DARPA (US Military) below. Big Ouch for @Joes Place & @*33*

SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2018 – a document not yet publicly disclosed.

The contents of the proposed program are extremely detailed. Peter Daszak lays out step-by-step what the organization intends to do by phase and by location. The primary scientists involved, their roles, and their institutions are indicated. The funding plan for the WIV work is its own document. The reasons why nonpharmaceutical interventions like masks and medical countermeasures like the mRNA vaccines do not work well can be extrapolated from the details. The reasons why the early treatment protocols work as curatives are apparent.

SARS-CoV-2’s form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately virulent, humanized recombinant SARSr-CoV that was to be reverse engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-CoV bat vaccine. Its nature can be determined from analysis of its genome with the context provided by the EcoHealth Alliance proposal. Joining this analysis with US intelligence collections on Wuhan will aid this determination.

DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too close to violating the gain-of-function (GoF) moratorium, despite what Peter Daszak says in the proposal (that the work would not). As is known, Dr. Fauci with NIAID did not reject the proposal. The work took place at the WIV and at several sites in the US, identified in detail in the proposal.

DRASTIC independently assesses that the tone of the proposal (see for instance the ‘our cave complex’) and the deep suggested involvement of some of the WIV parties (Shi Zheng Li employed half-time for 3 years – paid via the grant – and invited to DARPA headquarters at Arlington), may not have helped either – especially in the absence of any DURC risk mitigation program.

SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSR-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-COV backbone. It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019.

The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream, wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm that the recombinant vaccine does. Many doctors in the country have identified that the symptoms of vaccine reactions mirror the symptoms of the disease, which corroborates with the similar synthetic nature and function of the respective spike proteins.


The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation).

Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative).

 
7623cecd86f662b0c15e8d5afa8131ba399e33e286aa8686799d8f77fb6509e1.jpg
 
So do I or do I not have immunity after drinking some kind of bleach substance on accident during a root canal? TIA
 
  • Like
Reactions: ft254
Regardless of the narrative, it certainly didn't help that the WH did absolutely nothing from November 2019 until they were forced to admit there was a problem in March 2020.

That's five, count em five, months wasted fighting Covid.
Yep, I remember the Democrats in DC being so concerned about Covid during those months…I can’t believe Trump didn’t listen to any of them
 
Most people with their heads up their arses understand Covid probably came from a lab.

Most people with their heads up their arses understand lockdowns didnt work.

Most people with their heads up their arses understand masks don’t work.

Most people with their heads up their arses understand the vaccines were oversold.

Admitting they have their heads up their arses is another issue.
FIFY
 
Most people understand Covid probably came from a lab.
Duh.

Most people understand lockdowns didnt work.
This is true. It was an overreaction to the unknown; fear driven.
Most people understand masks don’t work.
Early on, they did serve as a viable mitigation tactic combined with other things like social distancing, crowd limitations, etc. Additionally, they became less affective when wearing them became optional and other variants surfaced. Hard to compare then to now; i.e., Alpha to Omicron
Most people understand the vaccines were oversold.
Again, you're essentially comparing Alpha to Omicron. Vaccines WCRAD pokes are still a good thing.


won't consume resources and die
 
Science should stick to science.

it was pretty obvious it came from a lab. Of course some wanted to score political points and scream racists, trump supporter ect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThisHawks4u
Yep, I remember the Democrats in DC being so concerned about Covid during those months…I can’t believe Trump didn’t listen to any of them
That's a joke, right?

You think all the Dems got the same briefings and intel that the WH got?

Don't take this wrong, but you're a moran.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blhawk
Science should stick to science.

it was pretty obvious it came from a lab. Of course some wanted to score political points and scream racists, trump supporter ect.

How is it obvious it came from a lab? I'm not opposed to the idea it did, I just haven't seen any unbiased proof of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: win4jj
Of course the leaders of the intel committee get this information.

Remember when Trump had his first Corona meeting and the media screamed that it wasn’t diverse enough. That was the mindset.
Peter Navarro, himself said, that they withheld certain info.

You are just embarrassing yourself now.
 
So you think they hid the information from Fauci as well?
Considering how much they have battled with the CDC, anything is possible.

Instead of working in conjunction with them, they treated them like adversaries.

Don't underestimate how incompetent the Trump WH was.
 
From DARPA (US Military) below. Big Ouch for @Joes Place & @*33*

SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2018 – a document not yet publicly disclosed.

The contents of the proposed program are extremely detailed. Peter Daszak lays out step-by-step what the organization intends to do by phase and by location. The primary scientists involved, their roles, and their institutions are indicated. The funding plan for the WIV work is its own document. The reasons why nonpharmaceutical interventions like masks and medical countermeasures like the mRNA vaccines do not work well can be extrapolated from the details. The reasons why the early treatment protocols work as curatives are apparent.

SARS-CoV-2’s form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately virulent, humanized recombinant SARSr-CoV that was to be reverse engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-CoV bat vaccine. Its nature can be determined from analysis of its genome with the context provided by the EcoHealth Alliance proposal. Joining this analysis with US intelligence collections on Wuhan will aid this determination.

DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too close to violating the gain-of-function (GoF) moratorium, despite what Peter Daszak says in the proposal (that the work would not). As is known, Dr. Fauci with NIAID did not reject the proposal. The work took place at the WIV and at several sites in the US, identified in detail in the proposal.

DRASTIC independently assesses that the tone of the proposal (see for instance the ‘our cave complex’) and the deep suggested involvement of some of the WIV parties (Shi Zheng Li employed half-time for 3 years – paid via the grant – and invited to DARPA headquarters at Arlington), may not have helped either – especially in the absence of any DURC risk mitigation program.

SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSR-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-COV backbone. It is likely a live vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves, but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019.

The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream, wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm that the recombinant vaccine does. Many doctors in the country have identified that the symptoms of vaccine reactions mirror the symptoms of the disease, which corroborates with the similar synthetic nature and function of the respective spike proteins.


The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation).

Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative).

I can tell its legit by the way there are no antecedents to the people it introduces. Definitely military intelligence.
 
I read the memo. He doesn't offer proof. Just assumptions. This appears to be an unsolicited memo to the IG from a guy that has no relevant expertise. It's just one dude that has appeared to buy into the crazy. He said he was a fellow with little work to do so he sat in on some meetings. The memo references that DRASTIC independently assesses.... Those are the online conspiracy peopke that have been pushing the lab theory all along.

This isn't some official DARPA review that made conclusive discoveries. This guy seems to be close to connecting this to Pepe Silvia.
 
Most people understand Covid probably came from a lab.

Most people understand lockdowns didnt work.

Most people understand masks don’t work.

Most people understand the vaccines were oversold.

Admitting these things is another issue.

1. No, we really don't know, but it's a possibility.
2. They worked to slow the spread, but obviously can only be viewed as a temporary measure.
3. Depends on the quality of the mask. Some masks work quite well. As public health policy masking may not have made a major difference in covid transmission.
4. Depends, oversold as a means to stop transmission of the disease over time, but not oversold in effectiveness in keeping people from being severely ill. Vaccines should be viewed as the single best preventative measure against undesirable outcomes from covid.
 
How is it obvious it came from a lab? I'm not opposed to the idea it did, I just haven't seen any unbiased proof of it.
You probably won't see 100% proof. We do know for certain the NIAID funded gain of function research, and the grant application describes a result that we ended up with. We also know there's no animal reservoir having a virus that closely resembles the alpha version of SARS-CoV-2. We also know that when there's a sudden jump from animals to humans, The genetic sequences show more correlation with bat viruses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: your_master5
Denial is tough for some. They look at the news outlet reporting the information rather than the information itself. Pfizer documents are trickling out. It's tough to doubt what we all think we should trust. People still don't believe Fauci approved gain of function funding. Wait.... he renamed it....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ThorneStockton
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT