Off the shelf from Tractor Supply? Yup.
Meanwhile, the IVM trial from PRINCIPLE hasn't yielded shit, and it's been ongoing since last June...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Off the shelf from Tractor Supply? Yup.
Meanwhile, the IVM trial from PRINCIPLE hasn't yielded shit, and it's been ongoing since last June...
Wonder why NH is trying to make IVM available without a prescription so people can use it over the counter? Cause Joe and 33 say it just doesn't work!Off the shelf from Tractor Supply? Yup.
LOL you're posting this BS again?! Mr. Disingenuous!Meanwhile, the IVM trial from PRINCIPLE hasn't yielded shit, and it's been ongoing since last June...
Yes, they did do something, they went ballistic when Trump cancelled flights from China, called him everything in the book and to this day accuse him of not doing anything. Even though he was the one to push the vaccine.Yep, I remember the Democrats in DC being so concerned about Covid during those months…I can’t believe Trump didn’t listen to any of them
Duke Medical School just announced their trial, which has been going on for awhile. I guess they could have saved some money and just asked Joes Place what the result will be.Meanwhile, the IVM trial from PRINCIPLE hasn't yielded shit, and it's been ongoing since last June...
Wonder why NH is trying to make IVM available without a prescription so people can use it over the counter?
Duke Medical School just announced their trial, which has been going on for awhile. I guess they could have saved some money and just asked Joes Place what the result will be.
Meanwhile, here's a link to a compilation of various studies - https://c19ivermectin.com/
Because it's been made political, if it does turn out that ivermectin is effective under some circumstances, the left will simply dismiss or ignore the evidence, just as they've done with other things that don't support their narrative.
It's FACTS, bro.LOL you're posting this BS again?!
So, they started in June, too, and haven't observed any significant signal, consistent with the PRINCIPLE group.Duke Medical School just announced their trial
Duke Medical School just announced their trial, which has been going on for awhile. I guess they could have saved some money and just asked Joes Place what the result will be.
Meanwhile, here's a link to a compilation of various studies - https://c19ivermectin.com/
Because it's been made political, if it does turn out that ivermectin is effective under some circumstances, the left will simply dismiss or ignore the evidence, just as they've done with other things that don't support their narrative.
LOL..........You're an idiot.LOLWUT?
I gave you the facts, bro. Post results from it....any results. You can't seem to handle why the study stopped and why that thing is a POS that was made to fail. Ding Dong.It's FACTS, bro.
UK PRINCIPLE group started a trial on this in June 2021.
I gave you the facts, bro.
You are such a misinformation machine! UK study was stopped because UK approved molnupiravir and bought 420k units. Not to mention $2.2B agreement with the US. Who was part of the Principle study? Oh yeah, Merck. You're so damn blind.UK's been "studying" it since last June.
If it had any serious potential, I think they'd have release results by now
Ivermectin to be investigated in adults aged 18+ as a possible treatment for COVID-19 in the PRINCIPLE trial — PRINCIPLE Trial
From today, ivermectin is being investigated in the UK as part of the Platform Randomised Trial of Treatments in the Community for Epidemic and Pandemic Illnesses (PRINCIPLE), the world’s largest clinical trial of possible COVID-19 treatments for recovery at home and in other non-hospital settings.www.principletrial.org
And this:
High-dose ivermectin for early treatment of COVID-19 (COVER study): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dose-finding, proof-of-concept clinical trial
High concentrations of ivermectin demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effi…www.sciencedirect.com
In conclusion, we did not demonstrate a significant reduction in viral load between ivermectin and placebo, although a trend for the highest dose is apparent. Whether this drug might have clinical efficacy at lower doses remains debated. We believe that our findings further support the recommendation of the WHO[25], suggesting that it is currently advisable to refrain from administrating ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 outside clinical trials. Considering the reduced tolerability, large, high-dose clinical trials should not be recommended
No, you gave me nothing but your BS about the principle study. Then I gave you facts. Then I gave you a demolition of your "ANOTHER study" that actually showed reduction in the treatment arms lol but was a low quality study. Nice work!No. I gave YOU the facts.
ANOTHER study, with massive doses, that showed ZERO efficacy.
You are such a misinformation machine! UK study was stopped because UK approved molnupiravir and bought 420k units.
I linked you ANOTHER study, where they used VERY HIGH DOSES and identified no effects.No, you gave me nothing but your BS about the principle study.
Maybe you should learn to wait for data to emerge and not jump on the first thing that comes out that supports your political position. Maybe you should learn to not double down when you are proved wrong. Maybe you should learn to not be so condescending when you are proved wrong so often.Mebbe your "Ivermectin Bros" are waiting for a completely non-lethal/non-harmful variant of Covid to emerge, so they can dose people and claim "100% efficacy"....
Maybe you should learn to wait for data to emerge
Been waiting on those two studies from Duke and UK Principle now for >6 months.
EVERY OTHER generic drug that has shown clear benefits has been identified in <3 months.
At some point, you have to recognize the "disconnect" is that ivermectin is either completely useless, or provides such modest benefits that they are not detectable, which means they're mostly ineffective.
Furthermore, nearly ALL the people that these drugs would be investigated on, are being tested against a less-virulent strain of the virus, as the original virus and Delta aren't infecting people anymore. So, as I've already noted for you, if they find it "kinda works" against Omicron, it ain't the same thing as the drugs already found effective against those earlier strains.
It was stopped due to "supply shortage" which as you know Merck makes the drug so there is no "supply shortage". low dose study, only 3 days of treatment, and including parts past 7 days is a flawed study. There were NO results posted showing what you say. Just a statement which so happened to coincide with their deals for a competing drug. You're brainless.No, that's not why they said it was "stopped".
And it was going on for 7+ months. Other generic drugs tested on Covid saw results within a few WEEKS, and those studies were cut short because of the dramatic effects.
Why is Ivermectin different? Why is there no clear signal in these carefully designed, prospective studies?
Which was a trash study and they did find efficacy lolI linked you ANOTHER study, where they used VERY HIGH DOSES and identified no effects.
Because it's been made political, if it does turn out that ivermectin is effective under some circumstances, the left will simply dismiss or ignore the evidence, just as they've done with other things that don't support their narrative.
Which was a trash study and they did find efficacy lol
First of all, Ivermectin is being used in various other places in the world as a treatment.
It was stopped due to "supply shortage"
First of all, Ivermectin is being used in various other places in the world as a treatment. Just like with every other Covid treatment, results vary, and depend greatly on timing. I posted a link with a comprehensive list of studies, with mixed results. I don't cherry pick like you do
I posted a link with a comprehensive list of studies
Doesn't indicate fasting state
And they are trash studies.. its simple as that. dex is cheaper than IVM and is only SOC for c19
You think this is a great study bonehead? Love how you pick apart something I posted, but are an idiot when it comes to this trash study. BTW how did your prediction of that IVM obv study not getting peer reviewed turn out?The dude who can't give 1 quality study calling others trash...
Dah.....You know it's a conspiracy when ppl keep adding "well if this small caveat was in place benefit would have been seen"
Hahahahahahaha! You are not a serious person.Because Americans are pulling it off shelves after paying America's Frontline Doctors $150 for a "consult".
Veterinary clinics don't even have it because of the GOP "hoarders".
You think this is a great study bonehead? Love how you pick apart something I posted, but are an idiot when it comes to this trash study. BTW how did your prediction of that IVM obv study not getting peer reviewed turn out?
You're pathetic you can't stand up to what idiot Joe posts.
Already gave my thoughts bonehead. And go look it up for yourself.why don’t you do a review on the study and demonstrate you have the ability to actually understand doing a journal club.
yeah it got peer reviewed by a 12 yo…congrats… what journal was it peer reviewed through?
Already gave my thoughts bonehead. And go look it up for yourself.
LOL!No I said you do a journal club...not copy and paste someone else's thoughts