ADVERTISEMENT

Cruz: Media is sitting on bombshells about Trump, saving their ammo until Hillary needs help

The Tradition

HB King
Apr 23, 2002
128,687
103,413
113
Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) said on Sunday that the media is sitting on explosive negative information about front-runner Donald Trump with plans to run it later in the year to tear the candidate apart.

"I think an awful lot of reporters — I can't tell you how many media outlets I hear, you know, have this great exposé on Donald, on different aspects of his business dealings or his past, but they said, 'You know what? We're going to hold it to June or July,'" Cruz said on CBS's "Face The Nation" Sunday.

"We're not going to run it now."

Cruz said the media has given the front-runner "hundreds of millions of dollars of free advertising." Every press conference Trump has is shown on every television station, he said, noting the media helped create this "phenomenon."

"And all of the attacks on Donald that the media is not talking about now, you'd better believe come September, October, November — if he were the nominee — every day on the nightly news would be taking Donald apart," he said.

Cruz called out the media, saying one of the reasons they want Trump to be the eventual nominee is because they know he can't beat Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton.

"Hillary would wallop him," Cruz said.

"Donald may be the only person on the face of the planet that Hillary Clinton can beat."

Cruz addressed the fact that people haven't brought up the issue of Trump's tax returns recently, questioning why it wasn't mentioned during the recent Republican debate.

"As Mitt Romney rightly observed, the fact that Donald won't hand over his tax returns suggests there's a bombshell in there," Cruz said.

He also called out journalists for not talking more about what Trump may have told The New York Times editorial board in an off-the-record portion of an interview. The Times recently refused to release an audio recording from an off-the-record meeting with Trump in which some speculated the front-runner talked about immigration.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box...a-is-sitting-on-bombshells-about-donald-trump


If true....

despicable.jpg
 
Well, the Bilderberg meeting where they go in there and decide hills is the next prez because they really want bill, is in may. so it stands to reason they clear everyone out like ted and rubes by june, it's just hills and trump, in may she wins, by june Donald is toast. ted might be on to something
 
Gawd Trad...your side sees conspiracy everywhere! But then, Cruz is from Texas...the same place OiT calls home. Did he mention the Bilderberg's?
yes, OiT did. or do you mean ted? ted is part of the illuminati secret society crowd. he knows what their plan is bill and hills. he knows and he is ticked off
 
Seriously, with millions behind him why couldn't he do the same thing? If the press is sitting on something why can't Cruz find it too?
 
Seriously, with millions behind him why couldn't he do the same thing? If the press is sitting on something why can't Cruz find it too?
exactly. why has he not hammered hills yet? why keep going after ted and rubes? because she attended his wedding? he owes her? why did he always back dems in NY? why did he back off obozo and the B.C.? why did he flip flop on everything from healthcare to taxes? why does he continue to flip flop on abortion? why is he both a dem and a repub and he threatens to be an independent? could he be the master of the sheep-dip?
 
Yeah in a business where everybody tries to be first, everybody agreed to sit on the same thing for months....
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
The fact that the NY Times won't release the transcripts is troubling... why won't they release them?
 
The fact that the NY Times won't release the transcripts is troubling... why won't they release them?

Is it that difficult to understand what "off the record" means? My understanding is that it is typical for newspapers to have off the record conservations with politicans as well as other interview subjects. For example, I know you aren't an Iowa fan, but when a Des Moines Register reporter retired this year, he mentioned having many such discussions with Kirk Ferentz.

If the NY Times just releases the audio, who would ever speak to them in such a manner again? Why would they harm their own business like that? It would make no sense at all.

As far as the Bilderbergs thing, I'm still waiting on that Rick Perry presidency that OiT insisted upon a few years back.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT