ADVERTISEMENT

Danny Kavanaugh Davis III

cheerscoach

HB MVP
Mar 4, 2010
1,410
887
113
How is this guy playing football? He took pictures of and laughed at women being sexually assaulted. He'd be down the road if he played for Iowa, charges or not! Ask Mikail McCall and Marcus Coker.
 
He’s playing football because that is not the story. If that was the story, he would be facing criminal charges
 
He’s playing football because that is not the story. If that was the story, he would be facing criminal charges
No, the law is written poorly for what he did, so charging him is difficult. Our laws are way behind technology and social media.
 
And once again, make your post. Leave your political views out of it. Calling me dumbass is unnecessary as well.
There's nothing political about sexual abuse or assault. You wan't to overlook these acts because of politics. I don't let politics blind me to people's behavior or acts. Danny Davis should not be on a football field and Kavanaugh should not be sitting on the bench. I don't give a shit was politics they practice.
Are you a moderator or my wife? Then why do you think you can tell me what to say or post?
 
Cheerscoach,
I, in no way, shape or form, made excuses regarding sexual assault. Nor have I overlooked them. And, you are correct, there is nothing political about sexual assault. However, your invoking Kavanaugh's name into the thread is political. It's a football message board. There are other boards for politics. Like I said, post the issue regarding Danny Davis. I would have posted the same response to you if you had called him Danny "Bill Clinton Davis" as well (perhaps using Bill Cosby may have been a better option for you).

Calling me a dumbass, and resorting to name calling is unnecessary as well.
I tried to (and failed to some extent, and without without name calling) to keep the threads politics free. You however, chose to call me a dumbass. Therefore, I will provide some basic information for you
(I apologize to the remaining members of this board for this post).

I'll bet (if you're old enough, voted for Bill Clinton twice, or at least voted for Hillary, who went on the warpath and tried to ruin and assassinate the character of any woman that accused Bill of misconduct, with many of those allegations being very credible, and some have actually been proven (check out the 800K paid out to Paula Jones or Bill losing his law license).

Your character and sincerity come into question when you overlook proven allegations and character assassination, and then express outrage for an allegation that has zero corroborating evidence.

We are still waiting for any credible evidence regarding Kavanaugh. If there was any, Diane Feinstein would not have sat on Dr. Ford’s allegation for two months and leaked it after to the actual Senate Confirmation hearing.
I recommend you go back and review all of the tangible evidence against Kavanaugh. Don’t worry, that won’t take long because there is only an accusation from a person that was being used by the Democrats and exploited for political theater which is shameful. Dr. Ford obviously has some issues she has been sorting through, and Diane Feinstein should be ashamed.

You seem to have drawn a conclusion based on a political lean, and not evidence. How do I know this? Because there is no evidence. When every person Dr. Ford said was at the “party” signs an affidavit under oath that no such social get together even occurred ... And when one of those individuals is Leland Keyser, Dr. Ford’s best friend at the time, and still a very close friend, says under oath, the social gathering never occurred, and she does not know, nor has she ever met Brett Kavanaugh, that raises serious questions about the credibility of Dr. Ford’s accusation.

When Dr. Ford refused to fly to Washington DC to tell her story to the Judicial Committee (anonymously, behind closed doors) and she refuses, citing the alleged event has caused her to suffer from claustrophobia and therefor, she is unable to fly, yet she recently flew to DE, and flies all over the world surfing... that is another question mark into her credibility and her honesty. To make matters worse, Dr. Ford was unaware the Judicial Committee offered to fly to CA to meet with her there (Dr. Ford’s law team, which was recommended to her by Diane Feinstein, failed to even inform her of that offer/option).

Dr. Ford said she wasn’t very familiar with how polygraph tests work etc. and had never coached anyone on how to take one... That was a lie. She actually has taught and coached people on how to take polygraphs. This includes her friend, a former FBI agent, whom Dr. Ford helped and coached for the polygraph portion of her FBI hiring process. That raises more questions into her honesty.-- Well, it actually doesn’t raise any questions of her honesty. It confirms her lack of it.

Dr. Ford claimed that while she was locked in the bathroom, she heard the young men, exiting the bedroom, and they were talking and laughing as they went down the hall and the stairs. An immediate follow up question was asked regarding what was said, etc. Dr. Ford then clarified she couldn’t actually hear them, she just assumed they were talking and laughing. “I assumed they were.” This means even if Dr. Ford believes her own story, we have proof, she has created a scenario in her mind (the extent of which we do not know) to fill in gaps. Embellishments are not evidence. She was caught in multiple lies (some under oath) and caught fabricating evidence for her story to tie it together...

Dr. Ford also said she finally told her husband about the assault when they were remodeling their home and they had a disagreement regarding her insistence on having an additional/ separate/front door. She tried to imply that is was due to the alleged assault. As it turns out, the timeline on that doesn’t add up based on when the remodeled, and when she claims she finally told her husband. Also, the building permits show she was required to have the separate front door for the counseling office she wanted to run out of her home.

Perhaps Dr. Ford was assaulted, but her recollection and inconsistencies in her story point strongly it probably wasn’t Kavanaugh since nothing adds up.

You want to keep politics off the football board, yet you go into a long-winded political diatribe full of circular reasoning (that is at best cherry picked and myopic) to illustrate why politics should not be on the football board?

Lol. Thanks for keeping the board a Safe Zone, Snowflake.

To the OP: this thread is stupid. And putting "Kavanaugh" in the title is even more stupid.
 
You want to keep politics off the football board, yet you go into a long-winded political diatribe full of circular reasoning (that is at best cherry picked and myopic) to illustrate why politics should not be on the football board?

Lol. Thanks for keeping the board a Safe Zone, Snowflake.

To the OP: this thread is stupid. And putting "Kavanaugh" in the title is even more stupid.

I apologize, and I also apologized in my post for what I was about to post in the thread.
I deleted it. I must adhere to my own standard. Thank you for calling me out. (however, please feel free to check my facts. What was cherry picked were facts and her actual testimony which I am not ashamed of).
 
Last edited:
How is this guy playing football? He took pictures of and laughed at women being sexually assaulted. He'd be down the road if he played for Iowa, charges or not! Ask Mikail McCall and Marcus Coker.

I think he should have had a harsher penalty from Chryst but good God you don’t have the brains the good lord gave a goose.
 
There's nothing political about sexual abuse or assault. You wan't to overlook these acts because of politics. I don't let politics blind me to people's behavior or acts. Danny Davis should not be on a football field and Kavanaugh should not be sitting on the bench. I don't give a shit was politics they practice.
Are you a moderator or my wife? Then why do you think you can tell me what to say or post?
Kavanaugh should be sitting on the Bench as there was not one piece of evidence showing that he shouldn’t. If your willing to believe an orchestrated attempt of character asassination led by the Liberal Cesspool that started it, then I would encourage you to educate yourself on the backgrounds of the pathological liars who were involved. Do your research and get back to me. Or better yet, review the Clinton Foundation’s 2014 Tax Return and give me a logical explanation for what you see.
 
Kavanaugh should be sitting on the Bench as there was not one piece of evidence showing that he shouldn’t. If your willing to believe an orchestrated attempt of character asassination led by the Liberal Cesspool that started it, then I would encourage you to educate yourself on the backgrounds of the pathological liars who were involved. Do your research and get back to me. Or better yet, review the Clinton Foundation’s 2014 Tax Return and give me a logical explanation for what you see.

Cheerscoach thinks watching CNN is “educating himself”
 
  • Like
Reactions: bman546
Kavanaugh should be sitting on the Bench as there was not one piece of evidence showing that he shouldn’t. If your willing to believe an orchestrated attempt of character asassination led by the Liberal Cesspool that started it, then I would encourage you to educate yourself on the backgrounds of the pathological liars who were involved. Do your research and get back to me. Or better yet, review the Clinton Foundation’s 2014 Tax Return and give me a logical explanation for what you see.
LMAO! If you don't believe he ABSOLUTELY LIED to the U.S. Congress on what 'boof' and 'devil's triangle' means, then you are just too stupid to live, my friend. Anyone who would show such partisanship and would flat out lie to Congress has no business being a SCJ. Period. I'm not even a liberal, you ignorant twit. I was supporting him until I heard HIM LIE in real time. I didn't need anyone to tell me, I'm his age and I knew what those terms meant in 'our' day. Who gives a shit about the Clinton's, they weren't up for nomination. Did their tax returns show a payment to anyone involved in the accusations? I never voted for either one of those psychos. I'll take you on anytime about being 'educated' about what's going on in the world. I'm not one of the brainwashed sheep from the two party extremists.
But after I heard him lie 'in real time', Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus took over. Thanks for setting me straight, lol.
 
Cheerscoach thinks watching CNN is “educating himself”
I haven't watched CNN since 1993 when I last sold cable television advertising. How is it? Who's even on it these last couple decades?
Were you attempting to insult or marginalize me? Nice try.
Should I counter with some comment about FOX news or Rush Limbaugh now? I don't play that ignorant, partisan, division game. I deal in what can be substantiated by independent sources.
Would it make some of you feel better if I would have called him Danny Cosby Davis III? I don't defend ANYONE who partakes in or commits any kind of sexual abuse or assault whether it's Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby, Donald Trump (and his good friend Jeffrey Epstein) or Kavanaugh. You can remain benighted if you'd like, just don't bother me with it. Thanks.
 
Oh, and not to mention how he FLAT OUT LIED to Congress about he and his 'seniors' were old enough to drink that beer that he 'likes' so much. LOL. God, there are a lot of brainwashed people out there. Do YOUR homework about that before you bother to say anything else to me. Unless.....you believe he didn't know the legal drinking age when he was 17, lol. He'd be the only 17 year old in the history of man that didn't know when he could legally drink, lol. Good grief people. Wake the hell up.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT