You really don’t have any standards , do you?
And she doesn't either. It would work out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really don’t have any standards , do you?
Don't worry, I see what you did here even if no one else did.I would have thought they'd like Tinkerbell due to her being Pansexual and all.
That would be believable if their President didn't just come out saying that her two kids were trans and pansexuals and Disney needed 50% of their characters to be gay or minority. I think they're trying to make her happy.This is Disney being weary of the twitter keyboard warriors. Who are annoying AF but that is all they are. They jump on twitter to complain about everything.
This isn't actual elected politicians trying to cancel Peter Pan.
Lets just keep that in mind.
Thank you. Screw you, @FlickShagwell I give you gold and you can't even acknowledge it!Don't worry, I see what you did here even if no one else did.
Weird take given I just called them on it but then...you're a weird little dude. Let me guess...you're "partly disabled", too. Add that to the mix.This is the modern democratic party in action. This is you. You’re Disney.
That would be believable if their President didn't just come out saying that her two kids were trans and pansexuals and Disney needed 50% of their characters to be gay or minority. I think they're trying to make her happy.
You are Disney. Disney is you. Keep pandering to china, the game is up. You’re outed.Weird take given I just called them on it but then...you're a weird little dude. Let me guess...you're "partly disabled", too. Add that to the mix.
Yes. Karey Burke, President of Disney's General EntertainmentWho's president? Disney's?
Some NSFW language.Captain Hook, who famously has a prosthetic hook where his hand would be, was reportedly flagged because he exposes Disney to accusations of prejudice against disabled individuals due to his villainous nature.
Yes. Karey Burke, President of Disney's General Entertainment
True, but the very vocal minority are giving the Democrats a headache trying to separate themselves from them. Because there are a handful of Democrats that run their mouths in favor of this kind of crap.Wrong, this is the idiots on the fringe.
Most Democrats think shit like this is dumb AF.
LOL...I have no idea what the hell you're talking about...which is actually a relief from being subjected to your stupidity when you aren't totally incoherent.You are Disney. Disney is you. Keep pandering to china, the game is up. You’re outed.
Whatever you say Mickey. You’re Disney. Disney is you. Taliban is Disney. Disney is taliban. I’m sure you can use some properties from your curriculum to figure that one out.LOL...I have no idea what the hell you're talking about...which is actually a relief from being subjected to your stupidity when you aren't totally incoherent.
This is the point I’m at, which is why I said maybe just add it on the service itself….if they really add disclaimers to everything what is the point?Peter Pan already has a full screen timed warning about racism, which it fully deserves.
Adding body consciousness and that Captain Hook is disabled kind of diminishes the message.
I am not familiar with Sinclair or their history and political leanings, but in reality could one not also assert that they are bringing to light things that certain advocacy groups are attempting to install that reflect their agenda?I think you’re likely missing the point of the exercise. This is a weak example of Disney wokeness.
Any company of decent size either does this or should do this periodically. Take a look at all of your products, and look for anything people might be able to complain about. It doesn’t mean they’re getting rid of them, etc. But nobody wants to be blindsided; so they try to come up with every single thing people could possibly complain about in advance and then measure which ones are worth the risk.
I had never heard of this station before so I did a quick Google search. My suspicions were confirmed: they are owned by Sinclair. That’s the company that forces the extreme right opinion pieces to be aired on their local television stations.
Sssh. Don’t let them know we get this. There’s a midterm coming..,True, but the very vocal minority are giving the Democrats a headache trying to separate themselves from them. Because there are a handful of Democrats that run their mouths in favor of this kind of crap.
Ok let’s not get carried away defending Sinclair….they are about as 1984 right wing big brother as it gets…I am not familiar with Sinclair or their history and political leanings, but in reality could one not also assert that they are bringing to light things that certain advocacy groups are attempting to install that reflect their agenda?
Then let public opinion make the decision? Why would anyone be opposed to that?
I am not familiar with Sinclair or their history and political leanings, but in reality could one not also assert that they are bringing to light things that certain advocacy groups are attempting to install that reflect their agenda?
Then let public opinion make the decision? Why would anyone be opposed to that?
I’m not defending-merely asking a legitimate question.Ok let’s not get carried away defending Sinclair….they are about as 1984 right wing big brother as it gets…
That’s the TV look I grew up with...black and white.This is blackface,
Because corporations have been bent over by weak-minded fools like you and those that like your posts, I haven't worked in the corporate world? Interesting.Want to know how I know you’ve never worked a day in corporate America? Dumbass.
Sinclair is the opposite of most media ownership companies. They have more of a conservative bent to their programming and news presentations. 1 out of 1,000 drives the left crazy.I am not familiar with Sinclair or their history and political leanings, but in reality could one not also assert that they are bringing to light things that certain advocacy groups are attempting to install that reflect their agenda?
Then let public opinion make the decision? Why would anyone be opposed to that?
Nope. Figuring that one out would require some advanced psychological analysis of your psyche. And, hell no, I'm not descending into that cesspool.Whatever you say Mickey. You’re Disney. Disney is you. Taliban is Disney. Disney is taliban. I’m sure you can use some properties from your curriculum to figure that one out.
You’re a racist. Hitler is racist. Hitler is Nazi. Nazi is taliban. Taliban is Disney. Dems are Disney. You are Nazi.Nope. Figuring that one out would require some advanced psychological analysis of your psyche. And, hell no, I'm not descending into that cesspool.
🤯You’re a racist. Hitler is racist. Hitler is Nazi. Nazi is taliban. Taliban is Disney. Dems are Disney. You are Nazi.