It would take a new law to repeal an old one. Your proposition is illogical.
Typical for TradIt would take a new law to repeal an old one. Your proposition is illogical.
Non responsive.The federal government is too big and it costs too much!
It would take a new law to repeal an old one. Your proposition is illogical.
Hard to say really. You pass a law just to get rid of one and imagine what might happen? I’m sure Trad thinks nothing because all those laws are useless or worse. That may be true in some cases. But it’s more likely that old law was fulfilling some useful functions that matter to someone. So now you have to replace the old law. And getting new laws passed is a lot harder than it used to be. So you likely have to pass many new laws to address what one old law accomplished. Like most things Trad champions, they are more complex than he realizes.But it would decrease the number of effective laws.
Sure. That would explain the $4 TRILLION budget and the death of old programs like TVA and a list too long to mention...for bandwidth's sake.It would take a new law to repeal an old one. Your proposition is illogical.
Hard to say really. You pass a law just to get rid of one and imagine what might happen? I’m sure Trad thinks nothing because all those laws are useless or worse. That may be true in some cases. But it’s more likely that old law was fulfilling some useful functions that matter to someone. So now you have to replace the old law. And getting new laws passed is a lot harder than it used to be. So you likely have to pass many new laws to address what one old law accomplished. Like most things Trad champions, they are more complex than he realizes.
Sure. That would explain the $4 TRILLION budget and the death of old programs like TVA and a list too long to mention...for bandwidth's sake.
I have no idea. Do you?Oh, you're sooooo nuanced.
Is there any reason why Statute 18 U.S.C. § 336 makes it a federal crime to issue “any note, check, memorandum, token, or other obligation for a less sum than $1” in lieu of money?
I have no idea. Do you?
Clearly some executives who hate the constitution. That’s what cons claimed recently about non enforcement of laws.I have received refund checks for less than $1. We hung them on the fridge as a joke. Didn't know it was a violation of federal law. Who enforces this?
Ahh yes...the non-answer answer. Caught with another bad case of diarrhea of the keyboard.
You never learn.Ahh yes...the non-answer answer. Caught with another bad case of diarrhea of the keyboard.
Not from you. You never answer the questions. In this case, my response was tongue in cheek. Nevertheless, you pathetically attempt to save face with deflection or bad humor.You never learn.
The federal government is too big and it costs too much!
I’m sure he would start with those pesky wager and labor laws. Minimum wage. Gone. Workers protection. Gone. Child labor? The free loading kids need to work. No need for any overtime. Let the corporate overlords rule. They don’t have anywhere near enough money. As long as workers can afford two cars, they need to be further oppressed.
Can’t answer because of bandwidth, you know how it is.Ahh yes...the non-answer answer. Caught with another bad case of diarrhea of the keyboard.
Sure. That would explain the $4 TRILLION budget and the death of old programs like TVA and a list too long to mention...for bandwidth's sake.