ADVERTISEMENT

DOGE is dispatching agents across U.S. government

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,105
61,824
113
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are sending representatives to agencies across the federal government, four people familiar with the matter said, to begin preliminary interviews that will shape the tech executives’ enormous ambitions to tame Washington’s sprawling bureaucracy.

In recent days, aides with the nongovernmental “Department of Government Efficiency" tied to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team have spoken with staffers at more than a dozen federal agencies, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak with the media. The agencies include the Treasury Department, the Internal Revenue Service and the departments of Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, and Health and Human Services, the people said.

At the same time, Musk and Ramaswamy have significantly stepped up hiring for their new entity, with more than 50 staffers already working out of the offices of SpaceX, Musk’s rocket-building company, in downtown Washington, two of the people said. DOGE aims to have a staff of close to 100 people in place by Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, they said.


While much about DOGE remains unclear — including who is paying the salaries of these staffers or exactly how DOGE representatives work with the formal transition team — the agency outreach reflects intensifying efforts by Musk and Ramaswamy to propose what they say will be “drastic” cuts to federal spending and regulations. Even as the scale of their project grows, Musk and Ramaswamy are encountering a slew of obstacles, including reluctance among congressional Republicans to approve deep budget cuts and a skeptical career civil service.
Two government employees said remarks Musk and Ramaswamy have made about the civil service have made them wary of the entire DOGE effort. Longtime civil servants — some who have built their careers learning the intricacies of the federal bureaucracy — are an awkward fit with Silicon Valley’s fast-moving and disruptive culture. Many in Washington regard the tech entrepreneurs as arrogant or naive about the complexity of reining in government.
The U.S. presidential transition process traditionally involves teams from the incoming administration working with existing agency staff and officials on the transfer of power, including regular briefings. This year’s changeover is far smoother than it was four years ago, when the process was complicated by Trump’s refusal to recognize the results of the election. But the uncertain status of DOGE relative to the rest of the Trump transition team has raised new questions about who precisely is speaking for the incoming administration.


In a potential nod to the myriad challenges facing DOGE, Musk has begun tempering certain promises in his bid to achieve sweeping reform by reinventing the federal bureaucracy, eliminating entire agencies, shrinking the federal workforce and slashing historic sums from the federal budget. In an interview Wednesday night at CES, the tech trade show in Las Vegas, he said DOGE may fall short of his initial aim to cut $2 trillion in federal spending.
“I think we’ll try for $2 trillion. I think that’s like the best-case outcome,” he said. “But I do think that you kind of have to have some overage. I think if we try for $2 trillion, we’ve got a good shot at getting $1 [trillion].”
The idea of a commission to cut waste and regulation, long discussed among conservatives, was taken up by Musk and Trump during last year’s presidential election. Musk put $277 million toward electing Trump and other Republicans in 2024, and Trump has made the billionaire one of his most powerful advisers. After the election, Trump named Musk and Ramaswamy as DOGE’s co-leaders, assigned to identify government waste that the White House Office of Management and Budget would try to cut.


For a project named as a joking reference to a meme-based cryptocurrency, DOGE has taken numerous steps since the election to build a very real Washington operation. Over the past several weeks, DOGE has been deluged by applications that have poured in through direct messages on X, Musk’s social media site, where the group put out a public call for “super high-IQ small-government revolutionaries willing to work 80+ hours per week on unglamorous cost-cutting.”

That led to swarms of applicants who sought to bring their experience and credentials to the attention of Musk or Ramaswamy. In a blog post, Vinay Hiremath, co-founder of the tech company Loom, described four “intense and intoxicating” weeks of DOGE-related work after he became involved.
Although he ultimately decided not to relocate to Washington for a job with DOGE, Hiremath said he had been added to multiple groups on the encrypted messaging app Signal, where DOGE is conducting much of its initial work. Hiremath did not respond to requests for comment.


The crowdsourced callouts were followed by postings for more specific roles: Just after Christmas, DOGE said it was looking for IT, HR and financial staffers for full-time, salaried positions. This week, it put out a request for software engineers and information security engineers for full-time roles, advising applicants to send over “a few bullet points demonstrating exceptional ability” along with their cellphone numbers. On X, some users have listed their IQ scores in replies to Musk and DOGE and said they included them in their applications.
Key leadership roles have also fallen into place. Steve Davis, the Boring Company president who oversaw steep cost-cutting at Twitter (now X) after Musk bought it, is helping to oversee the entire effort, and deputies have been recruited to focus on narrower aspects of its agenda, such as legislation and regulation, according to two people familiar with the matter.
Emil Michael, a former Uber executive, is one of the people overseeing the effort to cut regulations, according to one person familiar with the matter, also speaking on the condition of anonymity to reflect matters not yet made public. Trump has announced the appointment of Katie Miller, former press secretary and communications director for former vice president Mike Pence, to DOGE. Trump also said in December that Bill McGinley, the former White House Cabinet secretary whom he’d previously named as White House counsel, would serve instead as DOGE counsel.


It remains unclear exactly how DOGE will drive change. The White House budget request applies to spending in fiscal 2026, which doesn’t begin until Oct. 1. Spending for the rest of the current fiscal year is being hashed out on Capitol Hill by congressional Republicans who already have voted overwhelmingly to boost spending for the Defense Department — an agency DOGE has vowed to target.
Numerous party officials, meanwhile, are quietly wary of approving big spending cuts at the same time they are working to extend the expiring provisions of Trump’s 2017 tax legislation, which would reduce revenue by trillions of dollars. And it’s not clear how much weight Musk’s star power will carry on Capitol Hill, where federal spending is often prized for its benefits to hometown constituents. The limits of Musk’s influence were revealed in late December when Congress revised a stopgap spending bill he criticized but passed separate legislation to implement many of the specific provisions he lambasted.
As Musk’s emissaries begin to make contact with federal officials, critical questions remain unresolved about the group’s authority and responsibilities. The two federal employees expressed confusion about what DOGE is assigned to do — including whether it has Trump’s full backing.


“Every administration has to establish a relationship with its career people, because it’s the career people who keep the government going,” said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a nonpartisan think tank. “I think this is an important foray, but given what they have stated, it will be difficult for some career individuals to be cooperative with the DOGE people, who are not elected and are more advisers than political appointees.”

 
If 50 people are able to trim $2 trillion in spending, that's money well spent.
Keep up man, Musk has already said lucky to get to 1 trillion, and the word on the street is Doge will cost more to operate than anything they save. Sound great huh?

Only 3 spots for legit savings, Military, Social Security, and Medicare. Good luck.
 
Keep up man, Musk has already said lucky to get to 1 trillion, and the word on the street is Doge will cost more to operate than anything they save. Sound great huh?

Only 3 spots for legit savings, Military, Social Security, and Medicare. Good luck.

Those are the three areas that the D’s want to cut. Fortunately, there are far more cuts than that.
 
What Would You Say You Do Here Office Space GIF


So a couple of these dudes will show up.

DOGE is ran by idiots, assigning idiots. Should be fruitful, wasting tax payer money to find waste in tax payer money. Somehow I think these guys salaries or contracts will be tied to a Trump business.
 
“Hiremath said he had been added to multiple groups on the encrypted messaging app Signal, where DOGE is conducting much of its initial work.”

From the OP.

Someone should tell DOGE government communications are public and are available via FOIA.
 
Funny, everyone seemed to applaud all the IRS agents going after private citizens, but hate the idea of agents going after government waste. So making sure money is taken is fine, but finding out where it's being wasted isn't. Makes zero sense to me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ICHerky
Funny, everyone seemed to applaud all the IRS agents going after private citizens, but hate the idea of agents going after government waist. So making sure money is taken is fine, but finding out where it's being waisted isn't. Makes zero sense to me.


Lots of flaws in your what about and thought process overall.....
1) It is waste.
2) IRS is a legit dept, not a bunch of unfunded, unvetted "investigators".
3) IRS is enforcing existing rules and regulations that have historically been underfunded so underenforced, they are't making up new "issues" to just poke around.
4) Doge stooges are not "agents" but underlings for the Broligarchs.
5) What expertise do these stooges have? IRS folks are trained....
6) What access do these off the street unvetted people get to our agency information that isn't available in public records?
7) Who vetted them to ask questions? Unless they go in as reporters for public information, then they could request that through the proper channels vs bothering working people with noise.
8) what intrinsic motivation do these people have to investigate and report? (you can't say "try to find waste" because you don't know the source of funding nor the individual motivation to them)


Now that isn't to say a review of spending isn't necessary, but we already do have a number of unused levers that can be pulled vs a very shady / self dealing non-govt entity just poking around all willy nilly.
 
How are they able to send people when they're not in office yet? Has this new agency been appropriated by congress?
I have so many questions

Who is funding DOGE?
Who would DOgE employees actually work for?
Will they adhere to public records and other laws?

Etc etc

So sick of Musk and Trump blowing off established norms like this shit doesn’t apply to them.
 
Ramaswamy - the guy whose only accomplishment is to grift and defraud investors out of hundreds of millions of dollars with his pharmaceutical company - great person to put our faith in!
Yup, he's a dirty mofo that won't hesitate to **** people over if it means he makes $$.

I'll never forget when a lady leaving a coffee shop in Grinnell, IA accidentally back into a vehicle on the street and Ramaswamy immediately claimed that an angry protestor "rammed" into his vehicle. Despite the police saying the accident was just that...an accident.
 
Lots of flaws in your what about and thought process overall.....
1) It is waste.
2) IRS is a legit dept, not a bunch of unfunded, unvetted "investigators".
3) IRS is enforcing existing rules and regulations that have historically been underfunded so underenforced, they are't making up new "issues" to just poke around.
4) Doge stooges are not "agents" but underlings for the Broligarchs.
5) What expertise do these stooges have? IRS folks are trained....
6) What access do these off the street unvetted people get to our agency information that isn't available in public records?
7) Who vetted them to ask questions? Unless they go in as reporters for public information, then they could request that through the proper channels vs bothering working people with noise.
8) what intrinsic motivation do these people have to investigate and report? (you can't say "try to find waste" because you don't know the source of funding nor the individual motivation to them)


Now that isn't to say a review of spending isn't necessary, but we already do have a number of unused levers that can be pulled vs a very shady / self dealing non-govt entity just poking around all willy nilly.
The IRS wasn't always a legit department. It became a department after someone said we need it to find people cheating on taxes. DOGE is now becoming a department that is going to find out where the government is wasting money. Nothing wrong with that. You wouldn't run your household budget without looking at wasted money and stopping it. You also would make sure your money coming in was still coming in. Just because you don't like who's in charge, doesn't make it a bad department.
 
The IRS wasn't always a legit department. It became a department after someone said we need it to find people cheating on taxes. DOGE is now becoming a department that is going to find out where the government is wasting money. Nothing wrong with that. You wouldn't run your household budget without looking at wasted money and stopping it. You also would make sure your money coming in was still coming in. Just because you don't like who's in charge, doesn't make it a bad department.


Again. Lots of faults in your position....
1) IRS is a legit department per Congressional approval.
2) Doge doesn't have approval, a charter, funding, etc.
3) We already have a dept that DOES look at waste. Why not leverage them vs a make believe group of self serving non govt entities. You wanna predict how many things they say "this is waste, cut it" and do so without understanding what they are talking about? The old "why make more laws, why not just enforce the existing" position comes to mind.
4) Personal budgets and govt budgets are just a bit different. And they are supposed to be looking at HOW the money is spent, not looking for a delta.
5) My opinion has nothing to do with my opinion on who is leading it. Who is leading it only makes it more of a joke.
6) It's not a dept, it's a club.
 
Funny, everyone seemed to applaud all the IRS agents going after private citizens, but hate the idea of agents going after government waste. So making sure money is taken is fine, but finding out where it's being wasted isn't. Makes zero sense to me.

Yes, I am for IRS agents enforcing our laws.

Are you not for law enforcement?
 
Keep up man, Musk has already said lucky to get to 1 trillion, and the word on the street is Doge will cost more to operate than anything they save. Sound great huh?

Only 3 spots for legit savings, Military, Social Security, and Medicare. Good luck.
Gawd, Social Security and Medicare are paid for by the taxes that are paid for by citizens. Yes, their budgets and outlays are counted toward the size of the federal budget but but

Those programs do not add to the national debt. They are not entitlement programs as in some give away program the money came from the people for their direct use.

I have heard many very smart economic people say that Social Security and Medicare are not an element of the national debt.
 
Those are the three areas that the D’s want to cut. Fortunately, there are far more cuts than that.
What, what , the Dems are not for cutting social security or medicare, they have never been that. They are Democrat created programs that meet the social purpose of helping people out by distributing back to them in services and money that people paid into it.

It was several senators and a bunch of Repubs that are always wanting to cut or end those two programs.
 
The IRS wasn't always a legit department. It became a department after someone said we need it to find people cheating on taxes. DOGE is now becoming a department that is going to find out where the government is wasting money. Nothing wrong with that. You wouldn't run your household budget without looking at wasted money and stopping it. You also would make sure your money coming in was still coming in. Just because you don't like who's in charge, doesn't make it a bad department.
The real evidence is that earners who get a W2 almost never, less that 1% of the time, cheat on their taxes. It is the self-employed are really rich who are the tax cheats.

And that is why the Repubs like to cut the IRS budget whenever they can get a chance. The IRS was legally created by the Fed govt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
Gawd, Social Security and Medicare are paid for by the taxes that are paid for by citizens. Yes, their budgets and outlays are counted toward the size of the federal budget but but

Those programs do not add to the national debt. They are not entitlement programs as in some give away program the money came from the people for their direct use.

It's a Ponzi, the money comes from other people, until someone is left holding the (empty) bag of broken promises.

In early 1968 President Lyndon Johnson made a change in the budget presentation by including Social Security and all other trust funds in a "unified budget."

He did this because at this point in time SS 'contributions' exceeded outlays, so combining it with the rest of the budget made his guns and butter deficits smaller on paper.

I have heard many very smart economic people say that Social Security and Medicare are not an element of the national debt.
You're correct they're not considered part of the national debt. The same way a corporation's underfunded pension doesn't show up as company debt.

March 20, 2024 8:32AM

Medicare and Social Security Are Responsible for 100 Percent of US Unfunded Obligations​

Over the next 75 years, US taxpayers face over $73 trillion in long‐term unfunded obligations. What’s more, this unfunded obligation is entirely driven by only two federal government programs: Medicare and Social Security.
  • Current policy is unsustainable as debt would exceed 500 percent of GDP by 2098.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
It's a Ponzi, the money comes from other people, until someone is left holding the (empty) bag of broken promises.

In early 1968 President Lyndon Johnson made a change in the budget presentation by including Social Security and all other trust funds in a "unified budget."

He did this because at this point in time SS 'contributions' exceeded outlays, so combining it with the rest of the budget made his guns and butter deficits smaller on paper.


You're correct they're not considered part of the national debt. The same way a corporation's underfunded pension doesn't show up as company debt.

March 20, 2024 8:32AM

Medicare and Social Security Are Responsible for 100 Percent of US Unfunded Obligations​

Over the next 75 years, US taxpayers face over $73 trillion in long‐term unfunded obligations. What’s more, this unfunded obligation is entirely driven by only two federal government programs: Medicare and Social Security.
  • Current policy is unsustainable as debt would exceed 500 percent of GDP by 2098.
Geezus it is so easy to fix social security with a little bit of guts. Raise the ceiling for income that is taxable, make the higher earners pay a slightly higher soc sec tax over $250K in earnings, and do some types of tax credits for the fairly rich to not take their soc sec but get the tax breaks instead, whatever

We have full employment but we have people living 20-30 years longer than in the 1930's as we all know. So fix it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and Kelsers
Geezus it is so easy to fix social security with a little bit of guts.

Doesn't 'fix' the fact it's a rob Peter to pay Paul Ponzi that has never generated returns on 'contributions' sufficient to support outlays.
For people born after 1975 the anticipated return is net negative.
Increasing the tax rates (again, the tax has been increased over 20 times in the programs history) can't change the fact we're past the salad days of the Ponzi, when people could expect their 'returns' to exceed their 'contributions.

Raise the ceiling for income that is taxable, make the higher earners pay a slightly higher soc sec tax over $250K in earnings, and do some types of tax credits for the fairly rich to not take their soc sec but get the tax breaks instead, whatever

I'd expect a combination of means testing and higher taxes. With no changes it still meets 77% of promised payouts, so it doesn't go away, just becomes an even worse 'investment' for everyone sucked into it.

We have full employment but we have people living 20-30 years longer than in the 1930's as we all know. So fix it.

Not so sure about the 'full employment' situation, when 1/3rd of men aren't working.

8cu9hSV.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Hammerhead02
Doesn't 'fix' the fact it's a rob Peter to pay Paul Ponzi that has never generated returns on 'contributions' sufficient to support outlays.
For people born after 1975 the anticipated return is net negative.
Increasing the tax rates (again, the tax has been increased over 20 times in the programs history) can't change the fact we're past the salad days of the Ponzi, when people could expect their 'returns' to exceed their 'contributions.



I'd expect a combination of means testing and higher taxes. With no changes it still meets 77% of promised payouts, so it doesn't go away, just becomes an even worse 'investment' for everyone sucked into it.



Not so sure about the 'full employment' situation, when 1/3rd of men aren't working.

8cu9hSV.png
I can already tell not to take you seriously.
 
I can already tell not to take you seriously.

Don't rely on me, read the Trustees report for yourself:

https://www.ssa.gov/OACT/TR/2024/tr2024.pdf

Under the Trustees’ intermediate assumptions, Social Security’s total cost is projected to be higher than its total income in 2024 and all later years. Total cost began to be higher than total income in 2021. Social Security’s cost has exceeded its non-interest income since 2010. ... Considered separately, the reserves of the OASI Trust Fund are projected to become depleted during 2033 under the intermediate assumptions.
...
The OASI Trust Fund reserves are projected to become depleted in 2033, at which time OASI income would be sufficient to pay 79 percent of OASI scheduled benefits.


79% is an increase from the 2023 report, that one projected the 77% of benefits I mentioned earlier.

The unserious people are the ones who won't deal with the reality of the situation. It was always a Ponzi, even if millions didn't understand it was.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT