But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh boy.But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
What are the people at Pints saying?Not getting my hopes up, but I pray to be proven wrong.
What are the people at Pints saying?
Fox Sports radio discussing it now. Says if Ohio State asserts themselves and pushes the conference, we'll play.
The Bad about the Big 12 , is 1 or 2 schools will often dictate the larger decisions. The good about the Big 12, is 1 or 2 schools will dictate the larger decisions.
Point being OSU is but 1 vote in a conference where everyone has an equal voice. Unless they threaten to leave or negotiate their own deal outside the Big 10 network, their voice is not much louder than Rugers.
this is my point, Texas has looked elsewhere before, so the threat is real and why others tow the line.OSU's voice is quite a bit larger than Rutgers. The Big 10 has done a good job of being unified on most things. OSU, Michigan, PSU have recognized for a great deal of time that making the entire conference better was always in their best interests. Which has made everyone happy (for the most part). Schools like Purdue, Minnesota, Indiana, etc., with the Big 10 revenues generated from TV deals have been able to keep them building. While also letting OSU, Michigan, PSU etc pursue their dreams to compete for national titles. And those TV deals have allowed every conference team to invest heavily in non-revenue sports such as volleyball, baseball, etc.
It's a long-winded way of saying that yes, everyone in the Big 10 has a voice, but if OSU pushes for something others will listen. If OSU were to start to make rumblings about looking elsewhere it would definitely get the attention of the Big 10. If Rutgers pushes for something, they would get told nicely that they are free to look for other conferences to be a part of.
Yes, that's unquestionably true. However, both schools have but one vote. If OSU is able to persuade enough members to reconvene and vote "yes" for 2020 football, I'm all for it. IMO it would mean the previous medical and legal concerns which aparently drove their original decision have since been satisfied. In the end, I don't think they reverse course but I hope I/m wrong.OSU's voice is quite a bit larger than Rutgers.
But I expect the Big10 to play this fall and you should see an announcement by Wednesday.
The ACC, Big 12, and SEC kicked the can down the road as far as possible for a fall season, starting games on Sept. 26. They could still wind up postponing until spring, depending on various factors. I would not be surprised either way. No doubt the B1G considered that option already. Perhaps they thought other P5 conferences would follow their lead, as they did regarding conference-only schedules, and are now regretting their decision.
It was not called the Big Two and Little Eight for yearsOSU's voice is quite a bit larger than Rutgers. The Big 10 has done a good job of being unified on most things. OSU, Michigan, PSU have recognized for a great deal of time that making the entire conference better was always in their best interests. Which has made everyone happy (for the most part). Schools like Purdue, Minnesota, Indiana, etc., with the Big 10 revenues generated from TV deals have been able to keep them building. While also letting OSU, Michigan, PSU etc pursue their dreams to compete for national titles. And those TV deals have allowed every conference team to invest heavily in non-revenue sports such as volleyball, baseball, etc.
It's a long-winded way of saying that yes, everyone in the Big 10 has a voice, but if OSU pushes for something others will listen. If OSU were to start to make rumblings about looking elsewhere it would definitely get the attention of the Big 10. If Rutgers pushes for something, they would get told nicely that they are free to look for other conferences to be a part of.
Ages well, I hope that it stays profanity free.For yours and Iowa’s sake I hope this thread ages well come Wednesday.
I think the players unionizing and the subsequent cancellation go hand in hand. Perhaps cancellation was a bluff in order to stop the movement
My thoughts exactly. It was a power move.
If so, it is only delaying the inevitable. Just cancelling seasons isn't going to magically make the issue of players organizing go away. Name and likeness money will help, but at some point the players are going to want more of the revenue than scholarships when coaches, administrators and support staff are all making a very good living. I very much think there is a lot of value in a free college education, but public would likely back players in getting some additional money.
The complexity is in how it impacts all the other sports. There isn't enough money to pay all the non-revenue sports athletes.
I have no idea how reliable this guy is. A friend sent me the tweet and I saw he has 23k followers, he’s from Cleveland and I thought it was interesting.