ADVERTISEMENT

EVERY VIDEO OF KYLE RITTENHOUSE (KENOSHA SHOOTING)

To prevent him from shooting others?

Yes but at this point Rittenhouse hadn't shot anyone, this Pedo was the first to be shot. Other people had AR15's so I am not going to assume Rittenhouse was just going to fire on someone at random. This Pedo was chasing and throwing stuff at him. This is a good lesson to my kids on why curfews should be followed and don't take a gun to a racially sensitive protest.
 
If only there weren't a way to find your qoutes.

Link to the articles where there were months of protests in many cities during Obama's term. You won't because you can't and are just flinging shit around again hoping someone will believe you. Stop spreading lies and misinformation.


You do you riley.
So how how many months did those protests last? How many cities?

I'll gladly be myself. It's a shame you have to be you.
 
Yes but at this point Rittenhouse hadn't shot anyone, this Pedo was the first to be shot. Other people had AR15's so I am not going to assume Rittenhouse was just going to fire on someone at random. This Pedo was chasing and throwing stuff at him. This is a good lesson to my kids on why curfews should be followed and don't take a gun to a racially sensitive protest.
If Rittenhouse threatened him by pointing his gun at him I believe he had a right to retaliate.

This happened because Rittenhouse went there to be a vigilante. That's not justifiable.
 
Trayvon became the attacker only after Zimmerman followed him because he looked like a "real suspicious guy". Zimmerman confronted Trayvon, while armed, and it ended up with Zimmerman killing him. Zimmerman initiated the confrontation without just cause.

As for Obama's comments: "You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago." That's not fanning the flames - that's pure empathy. Something we could use in a leader now.

If someone follows you down a street and or asks you questions, do you have the right to jump them and beat their head into the ground?
 
Video released by the NYT confirming that someone fired a weapon in the vicinity of Kyle as he is being chased by Joe prior to Kyle firing his weapon. Kyle would have every reason to believe he was being shot at in that moment.

 
False. His intentions are clearly stated in this video. Your commentary and conclusion is pure conjecture and thus invalid.

Lol - OK. The top video indicates that the victim was being threatened with a gun. If you're there purely to help you don't threaten unarmed people. When you do, something tragic like this can happen and you are responsible for initiating it.
 
Video released by the NYT confirming that someone fired a weapon in the vicinity of Kyle as he is being chased by Joe prior to Kyle firing his weapon. Kyle would have every reason to believe he was being shot at in that moment.

WHY DOES HE HAVE A GUN IN THE FIRST PLACE!!??? He's not authority. He has no connection with the businesses. He's there, WITH A GUN, with NO authority. If he was in a school this way, we'd be thrilled at those fighting him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
Video released by the NYT confirming that someone fired a weapon in the vicinity of Kyle as he is being chased by Joe prior to Kyle firing his weapon. Kyle would have every reason to believe he was being shot at in that moment.

Lol - you can't tell from that who fires when. It also looks like Rittenhouse turns and points the gun at the guy chasing him.

Regardless of the details, this kid made a terrible, terrible decision to bring an assault rifle to this protest. I hope that lesson doesn't get lost, but I suspect it will.
 
Lol - OK. The top video indicates that the victim was being threatened with a gun. If you're there purely to help you don't threaten unarmed people. When you do, something tragic like this can happen and you are responsible for initiating it.

With all the videos being taken of the entire scene from multiple angles, not a single one yet has shown Kyle threatening Rosenbaum with his weapon prior to being attacked. Unless of course Joe was simply threatened by Kyle standing in front of a private business with the intention of protecting it from looters and arsonists, as shown in the interview with him.
 
With all the videos being taken of the entire scene from multiple angles, not a single one yet has shown Kyle threatening Rosenbaum with his weapon prior to being attacked. Unless of course Joe was simply threatened by Kyle standing in front of a private business with the intention of protecting it from looters and arsonists, as shown in the interview with him.
Well, the guy who got shot was standing up to someone pointing a gun at him and it looked to me like the shooter was in the vicinity. Maybe it was someone else. That doesn't negate the absolute insanity of bringing an assault weapon to a protest like this.
 
3nxjSP9.jpg
 
I haven't seen a video of that as there's so far (who knows what is still yet to be made public) but plenty of eyewitnesses said he was pointing the gun at protestors which is what triggered the first murder victim to run after him.

I'm not arguing it didn't happen but does that make any sense? Dude points a gun at me and I'm Audi 5000, running the opposite direction as fast as I can.
 
This kid isn't going to prison. The people he shot were all serious criminals. They were all attacking him with weapons including a handgun and a Molotov cocktail. They charged him quickly and overcharged him as well. If they had gone the manslaughter route maybe they get a conviction but even that would be shaky.

It isn't illegal to transport firearms across state lines. It isn't illegal for him to have a rifle at the age of 17.

There will be plenty of people on the jury that will watch this videos and see that the people that got shot were attacking him. You can debate the law all you want but seeing the video is all it will take to convince at least one member of the jury.

The people that for shot were really bad people. The media labeled them protestors insead of career criminals, sex offender, and felons. All three by the way were white
 
Yet if a person intentionally provokes a fight as part of a plan to cause death or great bodily harm another person and claim a right of self-defense, he or she forfeits the right to use self-defense because his or her action is premeditated or intentional. Wis.Stat. § 939.48(2)(b).

There's plenty of evidence that the militia in general and the 17yo douche in particular provoked the fight. Particularly since the militia organizer was quoted as saying that the police told them that they would push the protestors to them to "deal with" and the police would leave to let them do it.

Additionally, the prosecution commonly argues that the person claiming self-defense is not entitled to self-defense because his or her behavior was the type of behavior that causes another person to attack and that the attack would not have happened if the other person had not been provoked. Wis.Stat. § 939.48(2)(a). Under this situation, a person forfeits the right to use self-defense unless:

(1) the attack results in the behavior that is the person claiming self-defense reasonably believes is likely to result in death or great bodily harm and the person claiming self-defense does not use “force intended or likely to cause death or bodily harm” to the other person; Wis.Stat. § 939.48(2)(a);

(2) the person claiming self-defense has “exhausted every other reasonable means to escape from or otherwise avoid death or great bodily harm at the hands of his or her assailant;” Wis.Stat. § 939.48(2)(a); or

(3) the person claiming self-defense “in good faith withdraws from the fight and gives adequate notice thereof to his or her assailant.” Wis.Stat. § 939.48(2)(b).

In this case, the 17 yo douche not only antagonized the protestors by pointing his AR at them but after the guy in red tossed the molotov and missed he can no longer say that he believes there was a threat of deadly force and he had a duty to continue to retreat not turn and murder someone who was 5'3" by shooting them in the head.
Did you even watch the video above that shoes the guy that was shot? If you wanna claim that he wasn’t a threat go ahead but any reasonable person watching that will come to the conclusion that he was jonesing for a fight and apparently sought one out.

Again, shooter was fleeing. So he met criteria of #2 above. He ran yet the maroon dude caught him anyway.

I hate this as much as anyone but after watching more video than I saw the other night when I posted, this kid walks. And at least one asshole took the asphalt temperature challenge because of his own actions. It seems.

Had all victims had only done what the one guy did, stopped and put up his hands and shown he wasn’t a threat, we’d have 2 less deaths here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKGrad93
The kid had no business being there...end of story
I agree with that. That’s the real tragedy.

But he was, he was attacked, and he lawfully defended himself against those attacks with deadly force as he is within his rights to do.

Who in the hell attacks a guy with an AR anyway?

Like a saying I heard just tonight:
“Don’t start nuthin, won’t be nuthin”
 
Apparently he found a weapon then didn’t he?
Not to my knowledge. He was the first person shot and was unarmed. The person shot in the arm had a handgun. The other dead guy had a skateboard.

Nevertheless, if this kid was threatening people with his gun and then was attacked he will have a tough defense.
 
No, what’s flat out disgusting is your fellow Magat proudly showcasing other Magats bragging about murdering Americans. Literally a few posts above you. Any words for him?
Didn't you claim to be a lawyer? You're throwing around some pretty big words for someone who supposedly knows the significance of them. Here is what i think: at 17 he shouldn't have been there doing what he did, also, by the end of this, he will be viewed as a hero.
 
Not to my knowledge. He was the first person shot and was unarmed. The person shot in the arm had a handgun. The other dead guy had a skateboard.

Nevertheless, if this kid was threatening people with his gun and then was attacked he will have a tough defense.
There is no evidence of that. None. But we have tons of evidence he was being threatened and attacked.
 
WHY DOES HE HAVE A GUN IN THE FIRST PLACE!!??? He's not authority. He has no connection with the businesses. He's there, WITH A GUN, with NO authority. If he was in a school this way, we'd be thrilled at those fighting him.

Self defense per the Second amendment. Read up on the second amendment and their reasoning that firearms are a natural extension of man's right to defend their own life. Kyle Rittenhouse needed that weapon that night. He was about to be beat to a pulp by a pedophile on the streets of Kenosha. That gun saved his life. Also, he needed it because local and State law enforcement and government officials were derelict in their duties and watched their city burn for the two previous nights.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT