Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember seeing this at the Barn in 05?06 believe it was during a 3A 2A Semi.So, the dad in question didn’t answer the door for reporters wanting his response. Imagine that....
It is the refs job to protect the wrestlers from illegal, dirty and dangerous moves, throws, holds and wrestlers. Depending on the circumstances I would be willing to go after the kid, ( if he is a high school kid) the dad and the ref. Who else is going to protect your kid if you aren't.So, the dad in question didn’t answer the door for reporters wanting his response. Imagine that....
Sometimes the animal protective instinct takes over and we do animal like things. We sometimes forget that we are just "animals with thumbs". . .
I remember seeing this at the Barn in 05?06 believe it was during a 3A 2A Semi.
Definitely could see the ref give 1 for the slam. The coaches are the ones that should have stopped the match. I believe if he Couldn’t continue or coaches decided not to. Would be a win by disqualification. My rules might be mixed up.
Could understand how the dad felt, but not the right reaction
Kids dad was declared the winner, only man left standing...So how did this all play out, anyone know? Assume they weren't able to finish the match so who declared the winner?
Should have gone after the coach instead if anythingSometimes the animal protective instinct takes over and we do animal like things. We sometimes forget that we are just "animals with thumbs". It is definitely something we should try to rise above, but I totally understand that reaction.
It is the refs job to protect the wrestlers from illegal, dirty and dangerous moves, throws, holds and wrestlers. Depending on the circumstances I would be willing to go after the kid, ( if he is a high school kid) the dad and the ref. Who else is going to protect your kid if you aren't.
+1000That was an illegal slam and the match should have been stopped and the slammer should have been DQ'ed on the spot. The wrestler in control is responsible to return the opponent to the mat...SAFELY. As in NOT on his head and neck at speed.
So I do understand the parental reaction there. Who would want to watch their son/daughter get seriously hurt, perhaps even paralyzed? The dad should have stayed off the mat and not rammed the offender...but that is much easier said than done in that situation.
Where was(were) the coach(es)? What was the ref looking at? That was pretty clearly an illegal slam...but they were getting ready to keep wrestling. Several mistakes made in that video IMO.
That was an illegal slam and the match should have been stopped and the slammer should have been DQ'ed on the spot. The wrestler in control is responsible to return the opponent to the mat...SAFELY. As in NOT on his head and neck at speed.
So I do understand the parental reaction there. Who would want to watch their son/daughter get seriously hurt, perhaps even paralyzed? The dad should have stayed off the mat and not rammed the offender...but that is much easier said than done in that situation.
Where was(were) the coach(es)? What was the ref looking at? That was pretty clearly an illegal slam...but they were getting ready to keep wrestling. Several mistakes made in that video IMO.
My rules are a little rusty, but I think if there’s no injury it’s a one point penalty, just as the official ruled. If the slammed kid couldn’t continue it would be a DQ.
Either way, it looked accidental, to me. Bottom man reached around the other guy’s head which left him unable to break his fall, and it looks like the weight shift caused to top guy to lose control and drop him on his head.
You're not really surprised by his post are you? As for yours, agree with you completely.JFC look at this knucklehead here.
You'd be willing to go after a HS kid because of a slam? Seems completely rational and well thought out.
Please don't let your kid wrestle. And if he's tough enough to wrestle please don't attend his matches.
Wonder who raised his arm cause it sure looked like the ref needed to go change his pants after that freight train came whistling by him.Kids dad was declared the winner, only man left standing...
There is a distinction made between an illegal hold, unnecessary roughness, and unsportsmanlike conduct. In each case the other kid is awarded a match point. In each case if the kid is unable to continue, the injured wrestler wins the match. If it is deemed unsportsmanlike conduct and the kid does something unsportsmanlike again, then it is flagrant misconduct and the kid is automatically ejected. I am guessing this was called an illegal move and the kid got a point. The kid who got thrown did not appear to be hurt as he was getting back in the referee's position without much - if any hesitation. In freestyle or greco, this would have been a beautiful 5 point move. In folk style, it is illegal was heck.That was an illegal slam and the match should have been stopped and the slammer should have been DQ'ed on the spot. The wrestler in control is responsible to return the opponent to the mat...SAFELY. As in NOT on his head and neck at speed.
So I do understand the parental reaction there. Who would want to watch their son/daughter get seriously hurt, perhaps even paralyzed? The dad should have stayed off the mat and not rammed the offender...but that is much easier said than done in that situation.
Where was(were) the coach(es)? What was the ref looking at? That was pretty clearly an illegal slam...but they were getting ready to keep wrestling. Several mistakes made in that video IMO.
It was an illegal slam and the ref called it an illegal slam. That is what both hands behind the head mean. 1 point goes to the opposing wrestler and the slammed wrestler is asked if he needs the 2 minutes of recovery time. Once recovery time is stopped or used up, the injured wrestler has an option to continue or not continue. If he choses to not continue, the injured wrestler is awarded the win. The guilty wrestler is only DQ'd after proper protocalls. and not on the spot. The ref did his job. The move happened quickly and the ref had no idea it was going to end up in a slam. There is no justification for the action of the parent.....PERIOD. Now, the parent can spend some time in the slammer.That was an illegal slam and the match should have been stopped and the slammer should have been DQ'ed on the spot. The wrestler in control is responsible to return the opponent to the mat...SAFELY. As in NOT on his head and neck at speed.
So I do understand the parental reaction there. Who would want to watch their son/daughter get seriously hurt, perhaps even paralyzed? The dad should have stayed off the mat and not rammed the offender...but that is much easier said than done in that situation.
Where was(were) the coach(es)? What was the ref looking at? That was pretty clearly an illegal slam...but they were getting ready to keep wrestling. Several mistakes made in that video IMO.
My bad. Misread your post.the ref did stop the match and gave the illegal hold/unnecessary roughness symbol. The Father should be banned for life from HS events.
It was an illegal slam and the ref called it an illegal slam. That is what both hands behind the head mean. 1 point goes to the opposing wrestler and the slammed wrestler is asked if he needs the 2 minutes of recovery time. Once recovery time is stopped or used up, the injured wrestler has an option to continue or not continue. If he choses to not continue, the injured wrestler is awarded the win. The guilty wrestler is only DQ'd after proper protocalls. and not on the spot. The ref did his job. The move happened quickly and the ref had no idea it was going to end up in a slam. There is no justification for the action of the parent.....PERIOD. Now, the parent can spend some time in the slammer.
It is the refs job to protect the wrestlers from illegal, dirty and dangerous moves, throws, holds and wrestlers. Depending on the circumstances I would be willing to go after the kid, ( if he is a high school kid) the dad and the ref. Who else is going to protect your kid if you aren't.
My bad. I changed my post.He blew the whistle and the match stopped he placed both hands behind his neck and then the fat guy freight trains the other kid.
So....if your kid is at bat in a baseball game and gets beaned by the pitcher, you're going to physically attack the pitcher? If your kid is playing football and receives a vicious chop block or helmet-to-helmet hit, you're going to run onto the field and attack the opposing player? If your kid is playing soccer and someone lays a brutal foul on his legs, you're going to run onto the field and attack the guilty player? I could go on and on with examples. The last thing we need is for parents to run onto sports fields to physically attack a player who they perceive as having done something egregious to their child. That needs to be left to the officials, coaches and teammates.
Either can end the match.Is not the coach involved in the decision to continue or not? My hazy memory recalls that on more than one occasion, the slammed wrestler's coach was the one that determined, after talking with the wrestler, if they should continue or not.
I wouldn't trust a HS wrestler, that just got slammed BTW, to make an independent, quality decision in that situation.
Either can end the match.
By "either can end the match" I mean the coach can end the match or the wrestler. If the coach wants to end the match, he ends the match. If the wrestler wants to end the match, he ends the match. The match is ended either way.Regardless of the feelings of the affected wrestler...should not the coach be involved in that decision? In other words, no matter the feelings of the wrestler, I think the coach should be the final determinant. I wouldn't trust a 15-18 year old kid to get it right every time in that type of situation.
By "either can end the match" I mean the coach can end the match or the wrestler. If the coach wants to end the match, he ends the match. If the wrestler wants to end the match, he ends the match. The match is ended either way.
Justin koethe? He was a good slammer