He'll appease them by committing suicide next...So is Pence a MAGA guy now? Last I checked they wanted him dead. I can't keep up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He'll appease them by committing suicide next...So is Pence a MAGA guy now? Last I checked they wanted him dead. I can't keep up.
Wow
You do realize that past presidents had kept documents? But why do a raid when a simple subpoena works?
Wow. Yep that is 100% saying they got him by the nads and he knows it….this is the guy that said you have to always get ahead of the story….
In your conspiracy theory addled mind I can see that.Because a subpoena would have only gotten them what they said they were looking for, not what they were hoping to find,... This looks suspiciously like a fishing trip.
Do you not see that you could make the same argument about the numerous investigations and scandals that surrounded Hillary? The however many hearings over Benghazi?
There is zero evidence to suggest that the FBI seizure of classified documents that Trump took with him when he left the WH was not on the level. You claim it’s an abuse of power…how?
Uh, noThis looks suspiciously like a fishing trip.
I lie that he used the word, “rummaged”. It’s personal to him in a way that he has never experienced. They went into his stuff in his place.
In your conspiracy theory addled mind I can see that.
There is probably video, too. But, guys like Rifler see streams of Antifa and BLM supporters at the Capitol on 1/6, so it probably won’t be helpful.Uh, no
Under a warrant, they list EXACTLY what they are looking for.
Trump can publicly disclose that
They ALSO log EVERYTHING THEY TAKE and provide a receipt for it.
Trump can publicly disclose that, too
He won't. Wanna know why?
Uh, no
Under a warrant, they list EXACTLY what they are looking for.
Trump can publicly disclose that
They ALSO log EVERYTHING THEY TAKE and provide a receipt for it.
Trump can publicly disclose that, too
He won't. Wanna know why?
I also enjoyed: "while i’m not a fan of donald trump, it is chilling to realize that this could happen to any one of us after livetweeting 34 consecutive crimes."
Sorry, but I lost any remaining trust that I might have had in the FBI, back in the 70's...
Is this an alt account for OIT? Given this, you probably mistrust a number of other aspects of our government. What a sad, annoying, and stressful way to go through life.Sorry, but I lost any remaining trust that I might have had in the FBI, back in the 70's...
Sorry, but I lost any remaining trust that I might have had in the FBI, back in the 70's...
And yet you trust trump. Wow, you are a poor judge of people.
They CANNOT take anything they are not looking for UNLESS there is obvious probable cause for taking it. That's how "warrants" work. A judge signed off on WHAT they can take.You do understand that "what they are looking for" is not the same as "what they take"....
I don't think you are Chris. I did think you were unaffiliated enough to call out a gross over step of power.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The Democrats plan seems to be to run a investigation, and right around the time it becomes obvious nothing will be found or done, start a new investigation, never having to acknowledge the failure of the original investigation. Maybe in 2024, 28, idk, but there will be a time all these investigations get investigated.
You do understand that "what they are looking for" is not the same as "what they take"....
Is this an alt account for OIT? Given this, you probably mistrust a number of other aspects of our government. What a sad, annoying, and stressful way to go through life.
AND will ultimately need to explain WHY they took items that were not included in the original warrant - particularly if they want to use those for any criminal prosecutions. Otherwise, that stuff is "invisible" in court.And yet they must still provide receipts…
This makes a lot of sense. Trump would want these secret pardons in his possession to hang over peoples heads. Written pardons would be something they would not give back in their negotiations with the FBI.
Which is odd, because people are far less trustable than systems run by different groups of people, any one of whom can blow the whistle on improper actions.I have a general level of mis-trust for a majority of our governmental systems,.. not particularly stressful.
They CANNOT take anything they are not looking for UNLESS there is obvious probable cause for taking it. That's how "warrants" work. A judge signed off on WHAT they can take.
This makes a lot of sense. Trump would want these pardons in his possession to hang over peoples heads. Written pardons would be something they would not give back in their negotiations with the FBI.
I'm not.Thank you for agreeing with me...
And yet they must still provide receipts…
Thank you for agreeing with me...
It's the law.Wonderful,.. nice of them to tell you what they've taken.
And yet they must still provide receipts…
If you operate your day-to-day life on the premise you cannot trust the government, you will find conflict and discord all around you. Obviously, individual people in all parts of the government have effed up and done illegal things, but I cannot believe it is systemic, especially when there are checks and balance involved. If it was systemic, it would be a conspiracy which could not survive in this day and age of leaks and social medial. It kind of reminds of Area 51 and being in the Air Force. There cannot be a conspiracy to hide the existence of extraterrestrial visitors, because there is no way that wouldn't leak out. The simple answer that is that there is a 99.9999999999999% chance we have not been visited, and if we have been, there is no chance such an alien force with such advanced technology would allow humans to capture and detain aliens and their space craft. We would have been exterminated.I have a general level of mis-trust for a majority of our governmental systems,.. not particularly stressful.
You're claiming they can "take anything". They absolutely CANNOT.
IF they took something NOT on the warrant list, Trumps lawyer's would be running overtime to get it back, and prevent them from delving into it. INSTEAD, they are all over Fox News bitching about things, instead of using the legal tools at their disposal. That screams volumes: FBI did NOT take anything they weren't looking for.
That's untrue.No, I'm claiming that once inside they are free to look for anything that might be useful to their cause,.. That's why it's called a fishing trip...
It is entirely reasonable to question the legality of property seized not specifically enumerated or otherwise authorized on the search warrant. It is also next level insane (and desperate) to put foward the suggestion that Chris Wray led an operation to intentionally plant incriminating evidence at Mar-a-Lago.Thank you for agreeing with me...