I posted the whole article over at the Off Topic Forum:I couldnt access that article without signing up and paying. What was the main point? That the tournament will be better with her in it doing her wizardry?
I just hope we dont get a repeat like the 2nd round game with Creighton where the refs just swallowed their whistles and let the jays just mug Clark and the hawks. That was brutal and infuriating to watch. You play great basketball all year with some suspect officiating here and there and then all of a sudden it becomes a football/wrestling match with mainly on one team playing that way.
I hope Clark and the hawks play great and get to the sweet 16 not only for us hawk fans but also so more fans can watch her. I meant the level of shooting in all ways, great passing, unsuspected great passes, rebounding, etc is just so fun to watch. And Martin and Marshall are very good players along with Monica's work which is amazing with her shooting both hands around the rim.
And I didnt mention dribbling about Clark as actually one of the plays she makes that I think is the best is when she starts accelerating about 75 feet from the basket, as she sees the alley way ahead of time, and she just pushes the ball out ahead of her and zooms past defenders. You can tell these other women are not used to that kind of dribbling speed or play against it very much.
I couldnt access that article without signing up and paying. What was the main point? That the tournament will be better with her in it doing her wizardry?
I just hope we dont get a repeat like the 2nd round game with Creighton where the refs just swallowed their whistles and let the jays just mug Clark and the hawks. That was brutal and infuriating to watch. You play great basketball all year with some suspect officiating here and there and then all of a sudden it becomes a football/wrestling match with mainly on one team playing that way.
I hope Clark and the hawks play great and get to the sweet 16 not only for us hawk fans but also so more fans can watch her. I meant the level of shooting in all ways, great passing, unsuspected great passes, rebounding, etc is just so fun to watch. And Martin and Marshall are very good players along with Monica's work which is amazing with her shooting both hands around the rim.
And I didnt mention dribbling about Clark as actually one of the plays she makes that I think is the best is when she starts accelerating about 75 feet from the basket, as she sees the alley way ahead of time, and she just pushes the ball out ahead of her and zooms past defenders. You can tell these other women are not used to that kind of dribbling speed or play against it very much.
It’s in the linked post.Can’t read either.
You are probably right, and there is a general east coast bias from the national media as well. However, I like to think the national exposure she has gotten might break through that a bit this year. Boston might be the best player on the best team, but she doesn't take South Carolina from a National Title threat to a middle of the road, unlikely to even make the tournament team if she is not there. Would Iowa even break .500 without Caitlyn Clark? From what I saw from them when she wasn't playing during the season, that's doubtful (being generous there). Boston does not make the rest of her team orders of magnitude better by simply being out on the floor with them.Unfortunately for Caitlin, Boston is the best player on the best team in the country and unless they somehow lay an egg in the tournament, she is almost a sure thing to win NPOY. Many of the people that vote for these awards don't even pay that much attention to what other players are doing, they have predetermined that Boston is the best.
Boston is grossly overrated - just look at her stats: 13.4 ppg (not even top 75); 9.6 rebounds per game (30th); 1.8 assists per game (not even top 125); 2 blocks per game (very ordinary); two 3-pointer's (for the entire season). Seemingly her best qualification for NPOY is that she's a post player on a national championship team.You are probably right, and there is a general east coast bias from the national media as well. However, I like to think the national exposure she has gotten might break through that a bit this year. Boston might be the best player on the best team, but she doesn't take South Carolina from a National Title threat to a middle of the road, unlikely to even make the tournament team if she is not there. Would Iowa even break .500 without Caitlyn Clark? From what I saw from them when she wasn't playing during the season, that's doubtful (being generous there). Boston does not make the rest of her team orders of magnitude better by simply being out on the floor with them.
I agree. She's the female Jordan. She fills arenas wherever she goes and is a highlight reel every game. Does things nobody else does.Caitlin reminds me of Jordan back in the day. A disruptive, generational talent who plays with confidence and a chip on her shoulder. She’s having the same kind of impact on viewers, albeit a smaller scale.
Exactly... Are opposing arenas filling to see Boston? A generational talent. I think she wins the player of the year.... Otherwise the award loses a ton of credibility an would hopefully be mocked by many.I agree. She's the female Jordan. She fills arenas wherever she goes and is a highlight reel every game. Does things nobody else does.
Be honest now....opposing fans are NOT filling up their arenas to see #22 play, either. She puts butts in the seats but other than CH, arenas are NOT filled up when she comes to town. (Fuller than usual, I would grant you.)Exactly... Are opposing arenas filling to see Boston? A generational talent. I think she wins the player of the year.... Otherwise the award loses a ton of credibility an would hopefully be mocked by many.
Actually, opposing teams ARE putting butts in seats to see Clark. At Iowa's away games, attendance is 2300 people higher than that team's average home game this year. They've set wbb attendance records at 3-4 away games this year. Caitlin Clark = butts in the seats & money in the bank.Be honest now....opposing fans are NOT filling up their arenas to see #22 play, either. She puts butts in the seats but other than CH, arenas are NOT filled up when she comes to town. (Fuller than usual, I would grant you.)
Caitlin is one helluva player....but don’t sell Boston short. She is too.
Agreed....but she isn't "filling up" other arenas....that s originally what the poster said.....,What I like about #22 is she really "understands" the crowd (home and away) and plays to them..and that is GREAT for women's collegiate basketball.Actually, opposing teams ARE putting butts in seats to see Clark. At Iowa's away games, attendance is 2300 people higher than that team's average home game this year. They've set wbb attendance records at 3-4 away games this year. Caitlin Clark = butts in the seats & money in the bank.
Not saying its not deserved, but the "give it to the best player on the best team " is crap. When the gal asked the panel on the selection show who should win the NPOTY, Lobo said Clark should win it, and then coach Peck just scoffed and said Boston should win it, like it was a forgone conclusion, and there shouldn't even be a discussion. Thats just laziness, and Peck has been there for the "Caitlan Clark experience", so she should be more informed...Agreed....but she isn't "filling up" other arenas....that s originally what the poster said.....,What I like about #22 is she really "understands" the crowd (home and away) and plays to them..and that is GREAT for women's collegiate basketball.
Like Bluder said, IF Caitlan was a male, folks would love her (swagger) but as a female, folks nitpik and criticize her "shortcomings"........and guys, she doesn't have many of those.
That being said.....the Boston gal is one helluva player and if she wins POY, it too was deserved.
If there were concrete criteria for POY there still would be debate, but it would be much more objective. As it stands, everyone who weighs in has their own definition of POY, so it's more difficult to agree/disagree with them.Not saying its not deserved, but the "give it to the best player on the best team " is crap. When the gal asked the panel on the selection show who should win the NPOTY, Lobo said Clark should win it, and then coach Peck just scoffed and said Boston should win it, like it was a forgone conclusion, and there shouldn't even be a discussion. Thats just laziness, and Peck has been there for the "Caitlan Clark experience", so she should be more informed...
It's a pretty subjective award...Who was the better college player...Magic or Bird?Not saying its not deserved, but the "give it to the best player on the best team " is crap. When the gal asked the panel on the selection show who should win the NPOTY, Lobo said Clark should win it, and then coach Peck just scoffed and said Boston should win it, like it was a forgone conclusion, and there shouldn't even be a discussion. Thats just laziness, and Peck has been there for the "Caitlan Clark experience", so she should be more informed...
Boston would be averaging 20 and 20 if she played for us, simply because she'd be playing more minutes. Actually probably less than 20 boards, but something like 21 and 15.
Boston is not "one helluva player". To the contrary, and nothing against her personally, but she's greatly overrated as born out by her stats. Not even in the top 75 in scoring and only 30th in rebounding doesn't qualify one has a POY candidate.Agreed....but she isn't "filling up" other arenas....that s originally what the poster said.....,What I like about #22 is she really "understands" the crowd (home and away) and plays to them..and that is GREAT for women's collegiate basketball.
Like Bluder said, IF Caitlan was a male, folks would love her (swagger) but as a female, folks nitpik and criticize her "shortcomings"........and guys, she doesn't have many of those.
That being said.....the Boston gal is one helluva player and if she wins POY, it too was deserved.
Randon...if you feel that strongly, I wouldn't vote for her if I were you.Boston is not "one helluva player". To the contrary, and nothing against her personally, but she's greatly overrated as born out by her stats. Not even in the top 75 in scoring and only 30th in rebounding doesn't qualify one has a POY candidate.