ADVERTISEMENT

Federal court orders to restore UI international students’ visas

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
80,369
64,304
113
A federal court ordered the visas of four international students at the University of Iowa, who previously had their student status revoked by the federal government, to be restored Thursday.


The UI students filed a federal complaint Monday against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the department’s Secretary Kristi Noem, and Acting Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Todd Lyons, for terminating their visa status without explanation.


The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa granted a temporary restraining order and ordered the restoration of the students’ status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, or SEVIS, backdated to the date of termination.



The court orders the DHS must not terminate their student visas while the lawsuit is pending and without proper reasoning. The order also blocks DHS from starting deportation proceedings.


Nationally, students who have had their visas revoked have taken the decision to court. A federal district judge in Georgia issued a temporary restraining order Friday to block the termination of 133 international students’ legal status.


Federal officials have revoked the visas of five international students at the UI, according to the Campaign to Organize Graduate Students, or COGS.


In an April 11 email to The Daily Iowan, a UI spokesperson said the university is aware of students who have been impacted and are unable to provide any details for privacy reasons.


“Good News! A temporary restraining order against the Feds, on behalf of some of the UI international students, has been granted!” COGS said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Thursday. “The courts continue to recognize in these cases that the Feds can’t operate with reckless disregard for the law. All you fascist bound to lose.”


International students comprise nearly one-third of the UI’s graduate student population. Nationally, more than 1.5 million people in the U.S. in 2023 were under student visas issued by the State Department, according to a DHS report.


Revoking international student visas is part of President Donald Trump’s efforts to restrict immigration. The Trump administration has not provided a reason for most visa revocations, but some students were targeted because of their involvement in pro-Palestine protests.


More than 1,500 students have had a sudden or unexpected change to their SEVIS listing or their visa status over the past two weeks, according to data compiled by Inside Higher Ed.


The data shows nine Iowa college students have had their SEVIS or visa status changed — two from Iowa State University, five from the UI, and two from Mount Mercy University.


A hearing on the preliminary injunction is set for Monday, May 5, in the federal courthouse in Des Moines.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4 and Huey Grey
While it is easy to assert this is "attacking minorities" and non-American students, there's a much bigger picture at work here.


This is the Trump administration using (and abusing) their powers to attack academia. Kicking international students out of the country is another way of sapping higher education of funding (along with cutting grants, eliminating indirect costs, etc).

International students mostly pay "full fare" at academic colleges and universities - it is a primary source of income for them (in-state kids often get lower tuition, and out-of-state students pay higher, but can get other discounts as "children of alums", etc). But the foreign students are paying "full freight".

By kicking them out, that is a MAJOR source of income for universities. Along with the other grants/budget cuts, this is designed to undermine our higher education systems. At the expense of individuals who voluntarily come here to get an education - disrupting their educations, families, etc. But the GOP doesn't care, because they want to "own those lib universities", and to extort $$ from them to get them to acquiesce and push government dictated/sponsored narratives at the schools.

It is simply another lever-arm to sap them of money. And they do not give a shit how disruptive that becomes to any individuals. Has much less to do with race or speech or whatever. It is using immigration powers for a purpose they were never intended to be used. Kicking out foreign students who commit crimes is how those powers were formally intended to be used (e.g. like booting the son of a Saudi years ago who was involved in vehicular homicide, etc). Using them to "stifle speech" is a 1A violation, outright; and using them to put more financial pressure on universities means it will just increase tuition rates for Americans who want to study (and push those costs to states, if they want their universities to continue to function).

And, yes, it is more Project2025 bullshit at work.
 











Minor legal infractions that showed up in criminal history searches — which the law explicitly says is not a basis to deny a foreign student, studying on an F1 visa, their legal status.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: cigaretteman
A federal court ordered the visas of four international students at the University of Iowa, who previously had their student status revoked by the federal government, to be restored Thursday.


The UI students filed a federal complaint Monday against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the department’s Secretary Kristi Noem, and Acting Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Todd Lyons, for terminating their visa status without explanation.


The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa granted a temporary restraining order and ordered the restoration of the students’ status in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, or SEVIS, backdated to the date of termination.



The court orders the DHS must not terminate their student visas while the lawsuit is pending and without proper reasoning. The order also blocks DHS from starting deportation proceedings.


Nationally, students who have had their visas revoked have taken the decision to court. A federal district judge in Georgia issued a temporary restraining order Friday to block the termination of 133 international students’ legal status.


Federal officials have revoked the visas of five international students at the UI, according to the Campaign to Organize Graduate Students, or COGS.


In an April 11 email to The Daily Iowan, a UI spokesperson said the university is aware of students who have been impacted and are unable to provide any details for privacy reasons.


“Good News! A temporary restraining order against the Feds, on behalf of some of the UI international students, has been granted!” COGS said in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, on Thursday. “The courts continue to recognize in these cases that the Feds can’t operate with reckless disregard for the law. All you fascist bound to lose.”


International students comprise nearly one-third of the UI’s graduate student population. Nationally, more than 1.5 million people in the U.S. in 2023 were under student visas issued by the State Department, according to a DHS report.


Revoking international student visas is part of President Donald Trump’s efforts to restrict immigration. The Trump administration has not provided a reason for most visa revocations, but some students were targeted because of their involvement in pro-Palestine protests.


More than 1,500 students have had a sudden or unexpected change to their SEVIS listing or their visa status over the past two weeks, according to data compiled by Inside Higher Ed.


The data shows nine Iowa college students have had their SEVIS or visa status changed — two from Iowa State University, five from the UI, and two from Mount Mercy University.


A hearing on the preliminary injunction is set for Monday, May 5, in the federal courthouse in Des Moines.

This is team Trump. See a perceived problem. Enact sweeping solution. Reverse course when it doesn't work. Things are now worse than before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Taking another L in the courts.

Serious question, what cases are in the W column?

They can't be winning more that 5% of the cases?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT