Federal salaries lag 22.5 percent behind private sector, report finds

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
71,527
51,102
113
Federal employees’ salaries lag their private-sector counterparts in comparable jobs by 22.47 percent on average, an advisory group said in a Friday report that noted the “pay gap” has held steady over the last two years.

The findings by the Federal Salary Council highlight the need for President Biden’s proposed 4.6 percent raise for federal employees, unions said.

“With the latest inflation figures, rising private sector wages and the new pay gap calculation, it is even more clear that federal employees need help keeping up with rising costs and the government needs help in recruiting and retaining skilled employees,” National Treasury Employees Union President Tony Reardon said in a statement.

The last time the federal pay gap was computed, in late 2020, the council reported a 23.1 percent gap.






ADVERTISING

The council calculates pay differences on a national average and by some four dozen city areas using Labor Department statistics on costs of labor — not costs of living — under a formula set by a federal pay law.
Assessments using other data sets and methods have reached much different conclusions, though. Some conservative and libertarian organizations have concluded that federal employees make more than private sector workers, while the Congressional Budget Office in 2017 found federal employees to be slightly ahead on average but behind among those with higher levels of education.

Biden’s recommended pay boost would be the largest for the 2.1 million executive branch workers in two decades. Under the pay law, if Congress does not enact a figure by the end of the year, that recommendation takes effect automatically.


That seems likely to occur, with the House recently passing a spending bill for 2023 making no mention of a raise. A comparable bill in the Senate also is silent. Employee organizations and some Democrats in Congress continue to push for 5.1 percent, however.
In most years, the raise figure becomes an average, with part paid across the board and the remainder paid in amounts that differ depending on where employees work. The council this year calculated that employees working in the Washington-Baltimore area would be in line for one of the larger boosts.

The salary council projected that 0.5 percentage point of the 2023 raise would be devoted to location-based pay, although that, too, would be up to Biden to decide if Congress leaves matters in his hands.
By city zone, the largest increases in 2023 would be paid to employees working in the San Francisco-Oakland, Los Angeles, New York, Seattle-Tacoma, San Diego and Washington-Baltimore areas. The smallest would be paid to those working in the catchall locality outside the designated city areas, called the “rest of the U.S.”


At its meeting Friday, the council also recommended creating new localities in the Fresno, Calif., Spokane, Wash., Reno, Nev., and Rochester, N.Y., areas and expanding the boundaries of a number of existing localities. That would boost the salaries of some 33,000 employees by moving them out of the catchall locality.

The council’s recommendations now go to a higher-level group called the President’s Pay Agent made up of the heads of the Labor Department, Office of Management and Budget and Office of Personnel Management. That group in turn reports to the White House, with final action on a raise typically taken in a late-year presidential order.
The American Federation of Government Employees called on that group to accept those recommendations, saying they would “put additional money into the hands of federal employees whose pay lags behind their coworkers.”

 

Hawk and Awe

HR Heisman
Sep 15, 2012
5,676
5,288
113
I had to pay payroll tax on the phone a few months ago. It required me to spell out every letter of my business… like “push 2 for ABC” and “push 1 for A, 2 for B, 3 for C”. With the same computer voice repeating itself and guiding me through the dumb thing.

Whoever is supporting that mess deserves to lag a bit further behind than 22.5%
 

onlyTheObvious

HR Heisman
Jan 3, 2021
6,482
7,550
113
Then if it is so shitty enter the private sector.

most won’t.

measuring the exact type of work and comparing salaries isn’t an exact science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hwk23

NDallasRuss

HR Legend
Dec 5, 2002
32,601
18,522
113
This has been a big problem with the local government clients I work with. Esp for IT positions they can't get close to private sector pay.
 

Funky Bunch

HR Legend
Mar 30, 2011
25,523
40,586
113
Then if it is so shitty enter the private sector.

most won’t.

measuring the exact type of work and comparing salaries isn’t an exact science.

Actually there are many feds that retire and then come back 30 days later as a contractor making twice the salary and doing less work. It is beyond ridiculous how much the government wastes for some contracts.
 

B1GDeal

HR Heisman
Gold Member
Jan 21, 2005
7,223
8,200
113
I’ve worked for several different private companies and have had most federal holidays off (paid), often had several long weekends scattered throughout the year off (paid), the week after Christmas off paid for holiday break. Also had profit sharing and nice holiday bonuses. Our Insurance was pretty nice too. Employees got 3-5 weeks off paid each year too. Ill admit we didn’t get all 11 federal holidays but between the ones we got and the other days off we had more than 11 days. Pension would be the difference I guess because almost nobody gets those anymore when they were once pretty standard until about 20 years ago.