feds? this is how Obama pays back iowa for their strong support of him?
FIFY. Bring Caitlyn in to fix this.This is what tranny looks like.
FIFY. Bring Caitlyn in to fix this.
I say we start an all women’s e-sports team. It would be very cheap to operate and we’d have more Asian chicks on campus.
You win the thread. Just reclassify all competitive teams as sports. Debate, dance, sorority twister night should all count.I say we start an all women’s e-sports team. It would be very cheap to operate and we’d have more Asian chicks on campus.
That's pretty good. I expect them to come out in favor of unions any day now.L = liberal
That's pretty good. I expect them to come out in favor of unions any day now.![]()
NAALCP?
The NAACP hates unions? I think you misread it.
Agree, for the most part. Title IX is supposed to be about equal opportunities, not necessarily equal spending. But the bureaucrats who administer the law tend to be wacko zealots."Newkirk said the second complaint, which is being kept confidential by the federal government, alleges Barta has kept dozens of unnecessary players on the women's rowing roster to avoid the expense of having to add another women's sport."
Good.
This is one of the many problems with Title IX. Let's say it cost the Iowa athletic department $100,000 in "unnecessary" players for rowing, versus $500,000 to create women's judo why shouldn't that be allowed? It allows departments to remain fiscally responsible, to put that extra $400,000 into programs that fund the other 21 sports. Meanwhile no women are denied equal opportunity in education. Those "unnecessary" players don't like having to compete for playing time? Too bad. I bet the back FB feels the same way.
Looks like the illuminati doesn't like it when a new power pushes it's way to the front of the line. We ought to resolve this by just going to a gener neutral campus. No more segregation. Everything goes coed.
NAALCP?
L = liberal
Agree, for the most part. Title IX is supposed to be about equal opportunities, not necessarily equal spending. But the bureaucrats who administer the law tend to be wacko zealots.
I did, I read it as NCAA, got March on the mind.The NAACP hates unions? I think you misread it.
Just like in Starship Troopers. Iowa will be so cutting edge after we eliminate all acknowledgment of gender. Wouldn't that be a fun experiment?Even the showers? Damn. I'm going back to college boys.![]()
Half of the football team is unnecessary during any one year. But they do become necessary because if they were there, then at least two women's sports teams would not be required to balance them out."Newkirk said the second complaint, which is being kept confidential by the federal government, alleges Barta has kept dozens of unnecessary players on the women's rowing roster to avoid the expense of having to add another women's sport."
Good.
This is one of the many problems with Title IX. Let's say it cost the Iowa athletic department $100,000 in "unnecessary" players for rowing, versus $500,000 to create women's judo why shouldn't that be allowed? It allows departments to remain fiscally responsible, to put that extra $400,000 into programs that fund the other 21 sports. Meanwhile no women are denied equal opportunity in education. Those "unnecessary" players don't like having to compete for playing time? Too bad. I bet the back FB feels the same way.
NAALCP?