ADVERTISEMENT

Feds looking into gender bias allegations in 13 areas at Iowa

OnceAhawk

HB MVP
Jan 29, 2015
1,644
637
113
Feds open broad bias probe into Iowa athletics
4:03 PM ET


IOWA CITY, Iowa -- The University of Iowa is facing a wide-ranging federal civil rights investigation into allegations that its athletics department does not provide equal opportunities for female athletes, correspondence obtained by The Associated Press shows.

The Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education is looking into gender bias allegations in 13 areas, including how the department counts participation levels, awards scholarships, schedules practices and games and delivers services such as tutoring, medical attention, housing and dining. A team of investigators will visit the Iowa City campus in April, according to documents released Thursday under the open records law.

The department's equipment, locker rooms and facilities are also part of the review, which comes as its men's basketball and football teams have been enjoying high national rankings.

If discrimination is found, the investigation could result in a settlement requiring the university to change policies, spend more money on women's athletics or even add another women's sport. The review could take years, and a school lawyer told the federal agency in December that she believes an investigation will show Iowa "strives to provide male and female students an equal opportunity to participate."

At least one other Big Ten school, Minnesota, is facing a similar investigation by the civil rights office, which enforces the law known as Title IX that bars sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal aid.

Iowa has provided thousands of documents in response to investigators' request for 41 categories of records. Investigators plan to interview athletic director Gary Barta, administrators, coaches and athletes on all 24 of Iowa's teams during the weeklong visit beginning April 11. Iowa offers its roughly 800 student-athletes a great experience and looks "forward to sharing information about our programs and values," Barta said in a statement.

The civil rights office opened an initial investigation into the athletic department in May in response to a complaint filed by four women's field hockey team members.

They contended that Barta ignored their concerns about his decision to fire their coach, Tracey Griesbaum, which they argue was based on gender stereotypes and hurt the team's competitiveness. That complaint is still pending. Barta has said Griesbaum was fired over concerns about how she treated players.

Separately, Griesbaum is expected to file a discrimination lawsuit over her termination. Her partner, former senior associate athletic director Jane Meyer, already filed a lawsuit alleging she was unfairly reassigned to a different department after Griesbaum's firing and paid less than the man whom Barta hired to replace her. Meyer was in charge of ensuring equal opportunities for female athletes.

The second federal complaint was filed in September and stemmed from the first, according to Tom Newkirk, whose Des Moines law firm assisted with both and is representing Griesbaum and Meyer.

Newkirk said the second complaint, which is being kept confidential by the federal government, alleges Barta has kept dozens of unnecessary players on the women's rowing roster to avoid the expense of having to add another women's sport.

"That's allowed him to plow more money into football and basketball," he said.

The Department of Education rejected the university's request for the 29-page document under the Freedom of Information Act, saying its disclosure could interfere with the investigation.

"We still don't know the basis for the complaint, which is concerning for us. We do not believe we are being accorded due process," university lawyer Carroll Reasoner wrote to a federal official last month. She's appealing the Department of Education's decision to withhold the document.
 
You can never have enough female rowers.

Don't you love how the lawyers are attacking football and basketball? Well, guess what! Both football and basketball make women's athletic programs possible. And you know why? Because NO ONE buys tickets to women's athletic events.

Sorry for the rant. Just ticks me off. I wonder how much money Iowa is spending (for lawyer fees, etc) for all of the lawsuits and other crap involved in this story. What a waste of time and money. And they will probably settle with Tracey G and her lesbian lover; how much will that cost????
 
Don't you love how the lawyers are attacking football and basketball? Well, guess what! Both football and basketball make women's athletic programs possible. And you know why? Because NO ONE buys tickets to women's athletic events.

Sorry for the rant. Just ticks me off. I wonder how much money Iowa is spending (for lawyer fees, etc) for all of the lawsuits and other crap involved in this story. What a waste of time and money. And they will probably settle with Tracey G and her lesbian lover; how much will that cost????

Oh, I agree with all that but all I could think of was..........."Stroke! Stroke! Stroke!", the coxswain shouting loud and clear.

th
 
  • Like
Reactions: goodbyebobby
This underscores another reason to totally eliminate the Dept of Education along with several other government programs that exist. The progressives have been on a steady march for over 100 years establishing federal programs not in compliance with the Constitution. This has happened because all three branches - Executive, Legislative and Judicial - have cooperated in creating a behemoth that is at least 2/3s outside the specific responsibilities the Constitution assigned to the federal government. For example, Madison, the principal author of the Constitution said there is no provision to allow the government to take funds from one citizen to transfer to another citizen. And today many claim that to be an entitlement.
 
I am in favor of gender equality in the work place, but athletics is very different. I am not sure that I understand exactly what is expected for women in college athletics. I think that men's football, and to a lesser extent men's basketball, support all of the other sports. Maybe wrestling is self-supportive at Iowa??? So, what exactly is being expected of the athletic department? Are athletic departments actually expected to spend as much on women's athletic programs, which has minimal fan interest and generates very little revenue, as they spend on "comparable" men's programs.? Or, is this just a wrongful termination allegation...?
 
does the Iowa athletic dept or the University have to pay all of these lawyer fees, potential settlement amounts, etc?
 
Wonder if the university will investigate to see if Meyer was showing favoritism to Griesbaum. I was taught to never dip your pen in the company ink well, oh wait, that doesn't apply here.

Everyone is forgetting that she got fired because some players and parents complained about her abusive coaching behavior. Was Meyer protecting her prior to the complaint? Been involved in numerous bias cases, the truth will come out,

What is frustrating is that since she is a Lesbian and her boss is her partner it has received additional attention, FWIW, what did Meyer expect was going to happen to her when her partner filed a law suit. Of course she's going to be reassigned. Still have a huge issue reading that she could have had influence over decisions pertaining to her partner. Don't know of many companies that allow that conflict of interest, generally one of the two has to go.

Interesting that they are now grasping at other straws, too many rowers. Bet they didn't have an issue prior to that. Would be interesting to separate the cost of men's and women's sports and then look at revenue generated. I truly would like to see how much Women's sports are subsidized. I have a daughter so want her to have equal opportunities, but nothing has been handed to her. She is very successful and has earned everything she gets.
 
The fleecing of America. Who is going to benefit from this? Lawyers. This is a money grab opportubity. Makes me sick.

I believe in workplace equity to and I have daughters one of which plays sports. I would like to see equal opportunity for her but it has to be reasonable. I have no illusions nor would she that her sport would be given the same resources as football. We are happy when a few people outside of parents show up too watch.

The only 2 sports in 99% of athletic departments that create major revenue and potentially turn a profit are men's football and basketball. Football is the bread winner by far. Now it's under attack by this and concussion concerns.

I have a difficult time accepting that you can be rewarded for unethical behavior like what took place with the relationship between manager and employee. That is grounds for termination and/or reassignment right there. Furthermore, when you go out into the open market to hire a replacement for a high level position you often have to pay more not the same or less. It's also a function of the experience level and perceived abilities of the person hired. There's more to it than saying the person hired to replace me was brought in at a higher salary because of bias.

There's also tremendous concern about player safety and treatment across athletics so for Barta to dismiss player and parent concerns would have been troubling and heavily scrutinized publically. This was an absolute no-win situation.

Last the former coach ran a field hockey program. A sport not even played at the youth levels in Iowa to my knowledge. Is there a high school field hockey team in Iowa? I wonder if there are any native Iowans even on the team? Is this sport even played in the Midwest at the high school level? This is comical that this is part of the ridiculous equity mandated on athletic departments to create equal opportunities. This is being supported by the money we pay for football and to a lessor extent by basketball tickets! Men's sports no less make this possible financially. Give me a huge break.
 
You can never have enough female rowers.

Rowing probably won't get dropped(I'd actually be a little ticked if they did drop them, considering there isn't any other use for that building!), but there are going to be some sports that get the axe real soon. The SEC dropped their sponsored sports to 18. That's in order to pay more for football. Literally. The B1G has 24. That spreads the funds too thin. Got to keep up with the greedy Jones'.

I am all for collegiate sports at all levels. They have been around since the 1900s, and will be around long after my yet to arrive great grandkids have passed. But as this greedy Super conference BS continues to grow, we have to keep spending every dime we pay towards one sport just to keep up. Even when it surpasses the revenue (which unlike Iowa, is most D1 schools). Sorry ladies, you're getting the axe. It isn't gender bias, so don't go there. It just where the money is at.

When will this spending and spending on football stop? Not anytime soon. There are still lots of people, schools, to weed out. Like most of the B12. When that conference goes bye bye, only a couple will survive. The rest will fall to the 2nd tier MAC type conferences.
 
Rowing probably won't get dropped(I'd actually be a little ticked if they did drop them, considering there isn't any other use for that building!), but there are going to be some sports that get the axe real soon. The SEC dropped their sponsored sports to 18. That's in order to pay more for football. Literally. The B1G has 24. That spreads the funds too thin. Got to keep up with the greedy Jones'.

I am all for collegiate sports at all levels. They have been around since the 1900s, and will be around long after my yet to arrive great grandkids have passed. But as this greedy Super conference BS continues to grow, we have to keep spending every dime we pay towards one sport just to keep up. Even when it surpasses the revenue (which unlike Iowa, is most D1 schools). Sorry ladies, you're getting the axe. It isn't gender bias, so don't go there. It just where the money is at.

When will this spending and spending on football stop? Not anytime soon. There are still lots of people, schools, to weed out. Like most of the B12. When that conference goes bye bye, only a couple will survive. The rest will fall to the 2nd tier MAC type conferences.

I know this is the basketball board. But one quick thing. Don't worry about football, there's no way it can last another 20 years as is, and I have a feeling that as isn't won't attract the spectators.
 
Complete Libtarded lesbo witch hunt. The UI is going to waste funds fighting this BS when they could put that to renovating Carver, a facility that actually GENERATES money and is so outdated that the scoreboard resembles the one used in the Hickory gym in Hoosiers. The Dept of Education is a joke and has become a political hammer for these career criminals to use. 80% of govt could disappear right now and the US would finally be abiding by the Constitution but then people wouldn't be able to suck off the govt teat anymore. What a disgrace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amahawk
knowing the U of I, I am sure that they have bent over backwards to protect women's athletics and its associated lesbian lovers and what do they get for it..... hammered
Iowa could have dropped a men's sport or two and be fine with the no. of women's sports. (It's the no. of scholarships the powers that be look at and football has a lot) But it hasn't. like other schools and I think that is great. Still got baseball, men's gym, golf,tennis. I really don't know of a women's sport that could be added that I've heard of that is known in Iowa. And I'm all for women's sports, And whether a sport is a money maker should have nothing to do with it's value., whether men's or women's. Or how many watch it. Sport is sport.
 
Call Men's Basketball and Football semi-pro, divide them off into separate money pool and 95% of women's athletics goes away because they don't have a paid following.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IronFist1776
Ok. So let's go to the other extreme: No regulation? You folks really think there is no chance of discrimination that way?

Why bring reason into this? It's obvious liberal media is destroying America. (BTW, I think this lawsuit is ridiculous too)
 
Call Men's Basketball and Football semi-pro, divide them off into separate money pool and 95% of women's athletics goes away because they don't have a paid following.
Again, the reason for sports in college was not whether it had a big audience, but because it is sports. Don't you think if your proposal was adopted that other men.s sports would go away?
 
The lawyers aren't attacking anyone, we only work for people that attack. Like attack dogs if you will.

Its pretty obvious that football should be exempted from Title IX equations because, at most school, that's the event that pays for everything else. I too love the liberal on liberal warfare.

Having said that, the field hockey coach got screwed by the U and she should fight back.
 
Having said that, the field hockey coach got screwed by the U and she should fight back.

The field hockey coach engaged in an unethical relationship with her supervisor. Had that not happened and the allegations of player mistreatment been disproved she would likely be the coach today. She and her supervisor bear the full responsibility of their actions and the consequences.

Other coaches, including female coaches, who did not engage in this behavior did not get the same bias/perspective that the field hockey coach did because of this relationship.

There is a reason this type of thing is not permitted in today's corporations and businesses.

Let's not paint either like the innocent victim that they are now portraying themselves as.
 
Why bring reason into this? It's obvious liberal media is destroying America. (BTW, I think this lawsuit is ridiculous too)
That's not reason at all but just a different extreme. Just be honest, the federal govt and the multiple unConstitional branches they've created could go away and 80% of this nation's problems would evaporate.
 
And once again Title IX and the law of unintended consequences continue.

How many mens sports have been all but killed for club level womens teams?

Mens collegiate Gymnastics is on the death watch; mens wrestling teams have dropped by over half in the last 30 years.

And for club level womens teams that are nothing but a drain on the AD and are basically just there for a handfull of people. Just how big of a crowd does any womens sport draw outside of Basketball?
 
and the whole idea that someone that was having an affair with someone in the same department and was accused and shown evidence of abusing her players is somehow the VICTIM?

We know why of course- the Gay Mafia.
 
The lawyers aren't attacking anyone, we only work for people that attack. Like attack dogs if you will.

Its pretty obvious that football should be exempted from Title IX equations because, at most school, that's the event that pays for everything else. I too love the liberal on liberal warfare.

Having said that, the field hockey coach got screwed by the U and she should fight back.
Well, she got screwed if she was really fired for the reason given. I think we all know there was more to it than that but nobody was willing to go public with the real reason. Kind of looks like Barta screwed the pooch with the way it was handled but maybe if the lawsuit is allowed to go forward the real reasons will come out. More likely IMO they'll just pay her off to go away.
 
Feds open broad bias probe into Iowa athletics
4:03 PM ET


IOWA CITY, Iowa -- The University of Iowa is facing a wide-ranging federal civil rights investigation into allegations that its athletics department does not provide equal opportunities for female athletes, correspondence obtained by The Associated Press shows.

The Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education is looking into gender bias allegations in 13 areas, including how the department counts participation levels, awards scholarships, schedules practices and games and delivers services such as tutoring, medical attention, housing and dining. A team of investigators will visit the Iowa City campus in April, according to documents released Thursday under the open records law.

The department's equipment, locker rooms and facilities are also part of the review, which comes as its men's basketball and football teams have been enjoying high national rankings.

If discrimination is found, the investigation could result in a settlement requiring the university to change policies, spend more money on women's athletics or even add another women's sport. The review could take years, and a school lawyer told the federal agency in December that she believes an investigation will show Iowa "strives to provide male and female students an equal opportunity to participate."

At least one other Big Ten school, Minnesota, is facing a similar investigation by the civil rights office, which enforces the law known as Title IX that bars sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal aid.

Iowa has provided thousands of documents in response to investigators' request for 41 categories of records. Investigators plan to interview athletic director Gary Barta, administrators, coaches and athletes on all 24 of Iowa's teams during the weeklong visit beginning April 11. Iowa offers its roughly 800 student-athletes a great experience and looks "forward to sharing information about our programs and values," Barta said in a statement.

The civil rights office opened an initial investigation into the athletic department in May in response to a complaint filed by four women's field hockey team members.

They contended that Barta ignored their concerns about his decision to fire their coach, Tracey Griesbaum, which they argue was based on gender stereotypes and hurt the team's competitiveness. That complaint is still pending. Barta has said Griesbaum was fired over concerns about how she treated players.

Separately, Griesbaum is expected to file a discrimination lawsuit over her termination. Her partner, former senior associate athletic director Jane Meyer, already filed a lawsuit alleging she was unfairly reassigned to a different department after Griesbaum's firing and paid less than the man whom Barta hired to replace her. Meyer was in charge of ensuring equal opportunities for female athletes.

The second federal complaint was filed in September and stemmed from the first, according to Tom Newkirk, whose Des Moines law firm assisted with both and is representing Griesbaum and Meyer.

Newkirk said the second complaint, which is being kept confidential by the federal government, alleges Barta has kept dozens of unnecessary players on the women's rowing roster to avoid the expense of having to add another women's sport.

"That's allowed him to plow more money into football and basketball," he said.

The Department of Education rejected the university's request for the 29-page document under the Freedom of Information Act, saying its disclosure could interfere with the investigation.

"We still don't know the basis for the complaint, which is concerning for us. We do not believe we are being accorded due process," university lawyer Carroll Reasoner wrote to a federal official last month. She's appealing the Department of Education's decision to withhold the document.
They'll find reasonable doubt and give the university a list of things to do to make sure it doesn't happen again, they'll have 12 months (or so) to implement the recommendations. Slap on the wrist b/c they'll find nothing, but need to justify their jobs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT