ADVERTISEMENT

First US Moon Lander Mission In 50 Years Suffers 'Critical' Fuel Loss

seminole97

HR Legend
Jun 14, 2005
23,146
23,433
113
America's first commercial moon lander, and the first to launch from the Lower 48 in five decades, suffered a "critical" propellant loss from a fuel leak hours after United Launch Alliance's new Vulcan booster blasted the spacecraft into space early Monday morning.

"An ongoing propellant leak is causing the spacecraft's Attitude Control System (ACS) thrusters to operate well beyond their expected service life cycles to keep the lander from an uncontrollable tumble," Pittsburgh-based company Astrobotic Technology wrote in a statement about its Peregrine robotic lunar lander.

Astrobotic continued: "If the thrusters can continue to operate, we believe the spacecraft could continue in a stable sun-pointing state for approximately 40 more hours, based on current fuel consumption."

"At this time, the goal is to get Peregrine as close to lunar distance as we can before it loses the ability to maintain its sun-pointing position and subsequently loses power," Astrobotic added.

After launching from Florida at 0218 ET Monday aboard the Vulcan booster, the Peregrine lander separated from the rocket about an hour later and "entered a safe operational state." Hours after separation, the propulsion system issue occurred.

The failure of the propulsion system means the moon landing, initially scheduled for February 23, is no longer possible.

Astrobotic developed Peregrine under a $108 million contract with NASA.



 
My car got stuck in the snow this morning because of some dumb confidence in my ability to power through an unplowed street, so I will cut these folks a break.
 
My car got stuck in the snow this morning because of some dumb confidence in my ability to power through an unplowed street, so I will cut these folks a break.
Yeah, my sense is the space flight thing is still really hard, although some are making it look routine.

Glad there were no people on this ride. Seems to be unrecoverable problem. I’m sure it being a robotic vs human mission let them cut a lot of corners and try to deliver cheap. I don’t know what the whole launch package/process cost, because 108 million dollars to the moon sounds pretty cheap.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT