No, it's not. The dumbass manipulated the 2020 election results by county and aggregated them up. That's not data, that's manipulation to show something which only a bonehead like yourself believes.Yes. It is.
Supported by DATA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it's not. The dumbass manipulated the 2020 election results by county and aggregated them up. That's not data, that's manipulation to show something which only a bonehead like yourself believes.Yes. It is.
Supported by DATA.
Joey Gender wants data and facts.No, you gave me an "hypothesis"
Which isn't supported by "data" and "facts".
No, it's not. The dumbass manipulated the 2020 election results by county
It's not "math". He has no idea who in those counties got the jab vs. who didn't and who they voted for or what they are registered as. On top of that, each area had their own mandates back then. I'm also glad you showed a STUPID ASS CHART FROM OVER A YEAR AGO!"manipulated"?
No. He tracked them and cross-correlated with county Covid deaths rates.
That's "math".
Nowhere has that been proven. Nowhere, idiot.
Sure sped.
Why would you want 4-5 injections when you’re just going to get infected anyway, eventually.Weird how, despite being in the age group that Covid is particularly lethal to, they've all survived with pretty much no long-term health problems...
Because with vaccinations and boosts, I will have a very very low likelihood of a serious sickness AND lowered likelihood of Long Covid.Why would you want 4-5 injections when you’re just going to get infected anyway
No. And there’s a greater likelihood you’ll completely destroy your immune system.
No. And there’s a greater likelihood you’ll completely destroy your immune system.
Pretty much the same as other vaccines.As yet unproven, but perhaps a reasonable concern given that we don't really understand how the human body will react to continued and repetitive use of these MRNA vaccines
We’re not as smart...and probably a lot more greedy.As yet unproven, but perhaps a reasonable concern given that we don't really understand how the human body will react to continued and repetitive use of these MRNA vaccines,.. Suffice to say, we are typically never quite as smart as we think we are.
More Russian propaganda.We’re not as smart...and probably a lot more greedy.
Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden. She’s the former Chief of Pathology, a field that she’s worked in for the last 25 years, with a specialty in breast cancer diagnosis for the past 18 years. She’s studied thousands of autopsies and breast cancer samples. She’s extremely familiar with the industry and patient age, tumor size, and malignancy grade are all within her field of expertise and have had a natural rhythm throughout her career. That natural rhythm came to a halt in 2021 once the vaccine rollout began.
All of that is common knowledge,... Again, as I said and you conveniently excluded, we are typically never quite as smart as we think we are.Pretty much the same as other vaccines. They simply use a different method to trigger how the antibodies are created. They weren't created "yesterday", they've been studied for well north of a decade already.
All of that is common knowledge
We’re not as smart...and probably a lot more greedy.
Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden. She’s the former Chief of Pathology, a field that she’s worked in for the last 25 years, with a specialty in breast cancer diagnosis for the past 18 years. She’s studied thousands of autopsies and breast cancer samples. She’s extremely familiar with the industry and patient age, tumor size, and malignancy grade are all within her field of expertise and have had a natural rhythm throughout her career. That natural rhythm came to a halt in 2021 once the vaccine rollout began.
Studied and tested for > 10 years but never mass produced
We’re not as smart...and probably a lot more greedy.
Dr. Ute Kruger is a researcher and senior physician at Lunds University in Sweden. She’s the former Chief of Pathology, a field that she’s worked in for the last 25 years, with a specialty in breast cancer diagnosis for the past 18 years. She’s studied thousands of autopsies and breast cancer samples. She’s extremely familiar with the industry and patient age, tumor size, and malignancy grade are all within her field of expertise and have had a natural rhythm throughout her career. That natural rhythm came to a halt in 2021 once the vaccine rollout began.
Yep.
And it indicates we've been testing them and have a pretty good safety indication for them....
You want "excellent"?Thanks,.. Glad to hear you admit that the safety margin here is only "pretty good".
You want "excellent"?
Fine: They have an "excellent" safety profile.
No conflict of interest there
🤣🤣🤣Who do you think you are?,... Donald Trump the declassifier?
NopeNo conflict of interest there
I would be embarrassed to post anything from the EMA. Talk about conflict$ of intere$t.
Not ‘my claims’.More conspiracy sites, on top of conspiracy sites.
How about you go back to your original claim about that "pathologist" and "cancers".
If that's real, then EVERY pathologist EVERYWHERE should be seeing the same thing. There SHOULD BE publications about it now (>1 year later) vs some random blog page.
Can you source some of that for me to substantiate your claims?
YOU posted them.Not ‘my claims’.
I post articles.
I post articles in order to give open minded people (you’re obviously not included in that group) an opportunity to broaden their horizons.This is actually referred to as a Gish Gallop.
You're not defending ANYTHING you post.
Is this Hunter Biden posting? What a buffoon.sure as gods got sandals it has
As yet unproven, but perhaps a reasonable concern given that we don't really understand how the human body will react to continued and repetitive use of these MRNA vaccines,.. Suffice to say, we are typically never quite as smart as we think we are.
Is this Hunter Biden posting? What a buffoon.
Sure dipstick. When diagnosis and the first treatment prescription is misclassified as exposed rather than accounted for as unexposed. Which the bias can exist for MANY peer reviewed studies and has. But was never part of our discussions. I'm sure you'll tout the Together trial and it's conclusions, just like idiot bag Joe did despite it's numerous bias's and flaws. You're not an objective person. Please keep injecting Remdesivir after hospitalization like you admitted doing and putting patients at risk of renal failure and death. None of the research shows benefit there, yet you did it. Dumbass.care to describe immortal time yet?
You post nonsense.I post articles
Remdesivir after hospitalization like you admitted doing and putting patients at risk of renal failure and death