Good way to explain our situation. We put up with it.MSN
www.msn.com
Fran and Kirk have almost the same winning pct at Iowa and Fran hasn't been able to duck the best programs many years by being put in the weaker division of the conference like Kirk has for half of his career.Fran needs called out. However, Kirk has actually accomplished some stuff in his time at Iowa and routinely has guys getting drafted first round and having very successful NFL careers. Hiring brian has really put a stain on his legacy at UofI, but he’s got a pretty damn good resume.
If you don’t think Kirks career is FAR superior to that of Frans…well you’re beyond help. And putting guys in the NFL damn sure is part of his job.Fran and Kirk have almost the same winning pct at Iowa and Fran hasn't been able to duck the best programs many years by being put in the weaker division of the conference like Kirk has for half of his career.
They are quite similar. Putting guys in the NFL isn't Kirk's job and means nothing other than if it can help recruiting
PR and national narratives have not been a strong suite for Iowa the last few years.
Again, almost the same winning pct and Kirk's 2 outlier seasons of 15 and 21 since Fran was hired were because they didn't have to play the league's best teams and they both ended in complete embarrassment with Rose Bowl and BTCG. Kirk is better but it's really not that much better if you're being objective at all, the NCAA tourney and the bowl system are just completely different. Winning percentages don't lieIf you don’t think Kirks career is FAR superior to that of Frans…well you’re beyond help. And putting guys in the NFL damn sure is part of his job.
Putting players in the NFL is part of the job because its part of the selling point for recruits but its not an end to itself like some people pretend it is.Again, almost the same winning pct and Kirk's 2 outlier seasons of 15 and 21 since Fran was hired were because they didn't have to play the league's best teams and they both ended in complete embarrassment with Rose Bowl and BTCG. Kirk is better but it's really not that much better if you're being objective at all, the NCAA tourney and the bowl system are just completely different. Winning percentages don't lie
You're just wrong with the NFL bullshit, he's paid to win college football games. He doesn't get bonuses for putting guys in the NFL, he gets them for win totals, division and conference championships, and high finishes in the rankings. This past season was a disappointment whether Van Ness is a first rounder or not
Viral?MSN
www.msn.com
Viral?
You understand that is a link that is copied, right? I’m not saying viral.Viral?
Well let’s see here, big10 champs in 02,04 before the division split. Won the west in 15 and 21. National coty in 02. 4x BIG coty 02,04,09,15.Again, almost the same winning pct and Kirk's 2 outlier seasons of 15 and 21 since Fran was hired were because they didn't have to play the league's best teams and they both ended in complete embarrassment with Rose Bowl and BTCG. Kirk is better but it's really not that much better if you're being objective at all, the NCAA tourney and the bowl system are just completely different. Winning percentages don't lie
You're just wrong with the NFL bullshit, he's paid to win college football games. He doesn't get bonuses for putting guys in the NFL, he gets them for win totals, division and conference championships, and high finishes in the rankings. This past season was a disappointment whether Van Ness is a first rounder or not
I posted about this a week or so ago, but it’s not even just Barta. It’s very clear when you look across most sports, particularly football men‘s/women’s hoops and wrestling that Iowa very much values stability.Until Barta goes nothing matters. There won't be a change of any significance. Maybe an Olympic sport coach will get fired for Fran's lack of success.
Uh, if you're 43 right now then you were alive when we made the Final Four. And have been alive for four sweet sixteens that occurred after that Final Four season.I’m 43 years old. Iowa made it to the sweet 16 once in my lifetime when I was 9.. Many Iowa coaches have failed to advance that far in the tournament so it’s not just Fran but he sure has had a nice long crack at it to get her done..
Uh, if you're 43 right now then you were alive when we made the Final Four. And have been alive for four sweet sixteens that occurred after that Final Four season.
Yeah, either terrible at facts or terrible at math. If 9 years old in 1999, then not 43 now.Yah wtf was that lol?
time travelerYeah, either terrible at facts or terrible at math. If 9 years old in 1999, then not 43 now.
Two very good points.I have seen just about every game so far, and I can't think of one team that doesn't have 1 (or more) point guards that are better than any Fran has had at Iowa.
It is also frustrating to see all the supposedly "inferior" programs that are significantly more athletic than the Hawks. You cannot convince me that some of these players wouldn't jump at the chance to come to Iowa.
MSN
www.msn.com
The general point may hold, but it strikes me that stability and performance both matter. The stats here are a bit misleading. There were actually 7 men's basketball coaches, two of whom were fired (Dick Schultz after the 73-74 season), and two more were forced out rather than fired (Davis and Alford). Olson and Raveling are the only coaches of the seven who truly left voluntarily. After the tournament ends, Fran will be the longest serving hoops coach in the past 50 years and he has had success, even if it isn't as much as we fans would like.I posted about this a week or so ago, but it’s not even just Barta. It’s very clear when you look across most sports, particularly football men‘s/women’s hoops and wrestling that Iowa very much values stability.
Since 1974 (50 years), Iowa has had:
During that same span, they’ve only had 3 ADs. I think it’s all way less about “settling” and more about stability. Two of the firings were terrible coaches (Bob Commings & Todd Lickliter) and the other was Jim Zalesky to bring in Brands.
- 3 football coaches (1 fired)
- 6 men’s basketball coaches (1 fired)
- 4 women’s basketball coaches (0 fired)
- 4 wrestling coaches (1 fired)
Should be fired for this alone…The real question is why have the last 2 University of Iowa Presidents put up with Gary Barta?
How many discrimination lawsuits does he have to lose before he gets canned?
And Barta has given ridiculous contract extensions to both Kirk & Fran with COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY huge buy outs.
Iowa needs a change in Athletic Director and then go from there
Not the biggest Brain fan myself. I believe his play-calling to be far to cute.I actually applaud Franrentz. Choose a school without sky high expectations but not bottom tier and get paid handsomely for decent results in a mostly weak B10. Even got a little nepotism in there. Well played gentlemen. A tip of the cap...
Kettle meet Pot. Now go ban yourselfsome of you should be banned for the shit you post
What qualifies him for the position?For it to fit the definition of nepotism Brian would have to be unqualified for the position.
I think Fran is stuck on semi athletic positionless 6-6 to 6-9 players. It works against many teams but not very well against athletic skilled NCAA tourney teams.I have seen just about every game so far, and I can't think of one team that doesn't have 1 (or more) point guards that are better than any Fran has had at Iowa.
It is also frustrating to see all the supposedly "inferior" programs that are significantly more athletic than the Hawks. You cannot convince me that some of these players wouldn't jump at the chance to come to Iowa.
he's more qualified than you'll ever be,What qualifies him for the position?