This is a huge miss for FM and staff. Fran's recruiting tactics need to be retooled or this program never reaches the next level as in consistent NCAA tourney appearances and top five conference finishes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would you change the recruitment style of Carton or similar players? In my mind, it’s simple and nothing to do with the recruiting process. Just win more.This is a huge miss for FM and staff. Fran's recruiting tactics need to be retooled or this program never reaches the next level as in consistent NCAA tourney appearances and top five conference finishes.
Damn, take a pill or something. Only a few apologists on this thread, but you seem to be calling out just about anyone not whining about Fran. Your posts are the opposite extreme. A little more balance...Most certainly, however, a positive connection with the university that other schools did not have.
You can rationalize all you want why Iowa didn’t even make the final three cut but rationalization doesn’t improve the program. Talent does.
It has been comical to read the responses from those who thought Iowa was ever in the mix for Carton. Win and don't be a mediocre program Fran. You just got schooled by a program that was a dumpster fire with their version of you (coach kept too long who couldn't manage a roster) and is now benefiting from making a better hire. This is a concept lost on many in this forum. Keep Fran for life because he isn't Lickliter.
Carton this time, but it will be some other kid next etc. Fran can't recruit at this level and last year put Iowa much closer to the Lickliter years than anything resembling the regional powerhouse Fran talked about building. Again, see the impact of coaching changes at OSU, IU and countless other programs. No guarantees, but keeping Fran guarantees no NCAA appearances.
It has been comical to read the responses from those who thought Iowa was ever in the mix for Carton. Win and don't be a mediocre program Fran. You just got schooled by a program that was a dumpster fire with their version of you (coach kept too long who couldn't manage a roster) and is now benefiting from making a better hire. This is a concept lost on many in this forum. Keep Fran for life because he isn't Lickliter.
Carton this time, but it will be some other kid next etc. Fran can't recruit at this level and last year put Iowa much closer to the Lickliter years than anything resembling the regional powerhouse Fran talked about building. Again, see the impact of coaching changes at OSU, IU and countless other programs. No guarantees, but keeping Fran guarantees no NCAA appearances.
Damn, take a pill or something. Only a few apologists on this thread, but you seem to be calling out just about anyone not whining about Fran. Your posts are the opposite extreme. A little more balance...
I am pretty much with you that Fran needs to land the top kids in Iowa, and a good PG. I wish he had identified at least a grad transfer, like Mooney? from South Dakota, to get us some toughness and ball handling for the upcoming year, but Fran seems to have only one way to recruit. I believe that last year's dumpster fire makes this year pivotal for his program, so there better be some break through seasons coming from the players he has.Many have been rationalizing unacceptable performance for a long time. He wasn’t a native Iowan. His grandpa was a walkon. Hahahaha. Come on man...
What’s the “balance”?
We land foster, I’m good. Or we land a pg 60% as good as Carton, still good.
Balanced enough for you?
Both are still in the top tier of reputation in their respective sports.
To say either is not is just dumb.
I'm not really sure what you do but if you can't sell your program to a kid who grew up in your own backyard you need to change your approach some how.How would you change the recruitment style of Carton or similar players? In my mind, it’s simple and nothing to do with the recruiting process. Just win more.
Nebraska fb and Indiana bb are nothing like they once were reputation wise, to say they are is just dumb
If the people are under 25 years old, they would not think Nebraska or Indiana are top 10 programs. Nebraska hasn't been a top 30 team in FB over the past decade or two. IU has been up and down during the same period, and wouldn't be in the top 20. They both have incredible fan bases, who expect championships and alumni who pay what it takes to make it possible.Your hate has loosened your grip on reality.
Ask 10000 random people around the nation to list the top 10 all time college football and basketball programs. You don’t think Nebraska and Indiana make those respective lists?
I know one thing for sure — Iowa makes neither list and it wouldn’t be close.
If the people are under 25 years old, they would not think Nebraska or Indiana are top 10 programs. Nebraska hasn't been a top 30 team in FB over the past decade or two. IU has been up and down during the same period, and wouldn't be in the top 20. They both have incredible fan bases, who expect championships and alumni who pay what it takes to make it possible.
If you're talking "what have you done for me lately" then nebby and the hoosiers aren't impressive.
But all time in FB and BB, respectively, they are of course among the top 10 programs.
Did I say that Nebraska was not a top 10 all-time team in FB or that IU isn't a top 10 team all time in BB? Nope. I just pointed out that they haven't been close over the past couple of decades, although IU has had a couple of good years. I don't think that a lot of the kids know history, but they can see fan support and enthusiasm for the program. Iowa hasn't had great fan support in BB in most of these kid's lifetimes.Nonsense. When I was 20, Notre Dame sucked but I still knew that they were historically one of the country’s power programs. Nebraska is one of ten schools that have won more than 800 games (almost 900).
Same with IU, 5 National Championships. One of the top rated programs of all time in terms of winning percentage. Just won conference titles in 2016 and 2013. People know.
Well lookie there: https://m.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/best-college-basketball-schools
IU #8. Must be all old people voting online.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles...balls-10-greatest-programs-of-all-time#slide6
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...top-100-college-basketball-programs/99793618/
IU #6 all time.
https://fansided.com/2014/10/21/75-greatest-college-basketball-programs-time-statistically-ranked/8/
https://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/best-college-basketball-schools-in-the-country.html/
https://collegefootball.ap.org/top-100
Nebraska #6 all time
https://www.cheatsheet.com/sports/ranking-the-greatest-college-football-programs-of-all-time.html/
https://fansided.com/2014/10/18/50-greatest-college-football-programs-time-statistically-ranked/
True, but they tend to win a lot or they are gone.Stupid. Plenty of coaches go ape.
Your hate has loosened your grip on reality.
Ask 10000 random people around the nation to list the top 10 all time college football and basketball programs. You don’t think Nebraska and Indiana make those respective lists?
I know one thing for sure — Iowa makes neither list and it wouldn’t be close.
Who is this kid who grew up in Iowa's back yard?I'm not really sure what you do but if you can't sell your program to a kid who grew up in your own backyard you need to change your approach some how.
Sorry I have no massive hate for either nebraska or Indiana, do i love them, no. Granted they are considered blue bloods of all time but neither have acted like a blue blood the last 25 years or so.
Is there a single poster here that is even overly supportive of Fran, let alone wants to keep him for life?
Thad Matta and OSU were a dumpster fire? Damn would I love to be burning in that dumpster. NCAA tourney 9 out of 10 years, 7 straight. Followed by a bubble (11-7 conference and a poor season (7-11 conference). That isn't a dumpster fire, nor is Fran, but holy moly I'd rather have OSU version of it.
Time will tell.
So everything you just said could be wrong,... or not,... sounds about right.
Young coach.
MONSTER athletic programs. Few schools in the country can compare in terms of resources available to athletes.
Basketball is most definitely second fiddle though.
A bit surprised that he didn’t pick Michigan or IU but he’ll do well there.
Let’s face it. The ceiling at any of those three schools is higher than at Iowa. Just the way it is.
This is a comparably sleepy program. Something has to change.
Both are still in the top tier of reputation in their respective sports.
To say either is not is just dumb.
How do you figure that?
I remember an ESPN poll a few years back presenting a map of all the states who voted Nebraska was still a blue blood in football. Guess what? The map looked like Walter Mondale's map in 1984. Only the home state voted "aye." You think it would be much different if they conducted a similar poll for Indiana basketball? I doubt it.
If you want to look at it from an overall, all-time perspective, then yes, Indiana would be considered one of the best college basketball programs of all time. But that's not we're talking about here. We're talking modern era. An era in which Wisconsin basketball has been more relevant than Indiana.
Jeezus, dude. Read what I wrote including links before you embarrass yourself asking “How do you figure..?”
That Ranker site, for example is a real time polling site. Could it be any more clear?
FFS...
1. You obviously think very highly of yourself. You shouldn't. You're not that smart.
2. You go to extraordinary lengths on an anonymous message board to prove a point and belittle others. Another hobby might be more therapeutic for you, especially considering how accurate you were with your Carton prediction not too long ago. Now, you just seem butthurt. Perhaps you should consider meditating with your niece.
3. Go back and reread my post, where I agree with you that Indiana is one of the all-time greats in college basketball, then post again about who has reading comprehension issues. And, as you rightly point out in one of your other meaningful contributions to this thread, "blue blood" is a nebulous term in college sports. If we are talking current status in college basketball, then please provide evidence that Indiana is currently on par with the Dukes, UNCs, etc. of the world. In football, Minnesota has many national championships, the last one I believe occurring in 1960. Does that make them relevant today? Does Indiana basketball's last championship in 1987 make them more relevant? I guess it depends who you ask.
4. Get the f#ck over yourself.