The NBA is a clown show. Great athletes but a shitty product.
Ah yes. Gotta love these takes from people who don't watch the Association.
The NBA is a clown show. Great athletes but a shitty product.
Ah yes. Gotta love these takes from people who don't watch the Association.
He could score but what center in the NBA is Garza capable of defending, especially out on the perimeter during pick and roll?
Tall + White = Almost identical games.
It's better than the Myers Leonard comparison I've seen on this board.
I'd compare Garza's game to Enes Kanter.
I watched it for about 40 years and observed the development from an outstanding game into an orchestrated but dishonest form of entertainment, kind of like the WWE, into his collection of five guys playing one on one. Has it changed dramatically in the last few years?
I still catch parts of NBA games when there is literally nothing else on and its just seems sillier to me than it was a few years ago when I quit watching. Even the uniforms are stupid.
Similar games maybe but Kanter is still allot more horizontally mobile, even being sub par athletically for the nba.
i didn't think Cook was an NBA player, eitherDont think hes an NBA player. Certainly dont think hes a candidate to leave early for the NBA.
Kanter is very skilled offensively, watch the Celtics tonight. He has touch, can hit the mid range, & finishes at different angles. He can't guard anyone, and doesn't look to pass, just like Garza.
If Kanter is not the player comp for Garza, pray tell who in the NBA is. Obviously we're not talking about skill level, just give me a player comp.
Hes athletic but still looks his equilibrium is off or something.
The NBA is a clown show. Great athletes but a shitty product.
Cook is in the nba based purely on athleticism and potential
It's also quite possible Cleavlands front office is trying to tank.
To be fair, Jahlil Okafor was like the third pick in the draft a few years ago, and absolutely blows on defense... I think Garza could get drafted, but would be smart to stick it out all four yearsThat's really not true.
Theres lots of guys who could play offense in the nba but can't make a roster because of defense.
Are you serious? I'll give you what you say about Jokic as Luka is nowhere close to him. Boogie will play if he's healthy, he can go toe to toe with any big in the league and none of them could check him.The only two guys I can think of that are physically remotely similar to Garza are the Joker and DeMarcus Cousins.
Joker is such a unique talent that he has a ton of aspects that Garza doesn't and hes also bigger, and Cousins won't be in the nba much longer because he can't defend on the perimeter.
Are you serious? I'll give you what you say about Jokic as Luka is nowhere close to him. Boogie will play if he's healthy, he can go toe to toe with any big in the league and none of them could check him.
I love watching Luka but you're doing him a major disservice putting his name in a sentence with those two.
This is dead on. We are very lucky to have Luka, and even luckier that he will be a great 4-yr player for the Hawks. Luka will be able to make some money overseas playing basketball, but I would be shocked if he left early or if he became a first-round draft choice, even after his senior year.I agree with this completely. Most fans will see what he is doing in college and just assume that means he will leave for the NBA early. Also, when he does leave after his Senior year, they will be confused/mad when he doesn't get drafted (or maybe very late 2nd round) and is a fringe NBA player. There might be a place for him on the right team and in the right situation but the talk of him leaving early isn't realistic.
Kaminsky is more versatile than Garza and barely holding onto a position in the league....[/QUOTE
Fair enough if you watched it for that long. It goes in cycles. The NBA from 2006-present is much better than it was from 1990-2005. Can't speak before that.
Even 2019 It's very different compared to 2015. All I can suggest is watch. If you're a basketball fan, watch the games. Once you watch 10 in a row then watch a college game you'll see how much better everything is; from the spacing, to the offensive sets, defensive rotations, refs, and most of all, they make open shots.
I love basketball and I honestly can’t imagine watching ten NBA games.
l’ve tried.
I recognize that they have some of the greatest athletes in the world coached by some of the best basketball minds in the world and yet I’ve never found it compelling. Too many games maybe...?
I agree he has some issues related to athleticism for the NBA, but he is having a great year so if he continues at his current pace do you really think coming back for another year will improve his stock? I really don’t think so myself so to me it’s kind of his decision go after this year and see what happens, likely end up in the G league or Europe or come back for another year and maybe not improve your draft stock much but have another fun year of college basketball and then go with probably the same result. Kind of depends on how much he values another year of playing for Iowa on what would look to be a pretty good team with him back.
Obviously they're not the same offensive players as Garza is even a notch below athletically.
Totally agree. I love playing and watching basketball but watching NBA games is a chore.
It's likely because you aren't a fan of any of the teams. Find a team where you recognize a few of the players from college. Watch a few of their games to pick up on tendencies (who can pass, shoot, play D, etc.). It will make the game much more interesting. No one will ever get into the NBA (or college ball) if they don't have any allegiances, and just half watch every time they turn to it.
I did have allegiances growing up but my taste for the product has waned over the years. I get tired of watching the reffing skew towards the superstars (I’m not putting down the refs, I’m putting down what is obviously NBA policy) and I realize that has always been part of the game but really took off with Michael Jordan and has become more and more egregious. I get tired of know what teams will be in the Finals every year before the playoffs even start (Toronto was an outlier last year). And I hate the product - much less of a team game and much softer (I enjoyed the toughness and physicalness of the 80’s and 90’s). Now it it more pick and roll or isolation and the idea of fouling someone hard coming down the lane is gone. Watching Janes Harden is the pinnacle of bad and boring basketball to me. I’d rather watch a high school game than watch him jack up 40 shots in iso play while traveling and getting phantom fouls all game long.
Not to mention Jokic is one of the best passers in the game, whereas Luka just doesn't pass.
I did have allegiances growing up but my taste for the product has waned over the years. I get tired of watching the reffing skew towards the superstars (I’m not putting down the refs, I’m putting down what is obviously NBA policy) and I realize that has always been part of the game but really took off with Michael Jordan and has become more and more egregious. I get tired of know what teams will be in the Finals every year before the playoffs even start (Toronto was an outlier last year). And I hate the product - much less of a team game and much softer (I enjoyed the toughness and physicalness of the 80’s and 90’s). Now it it more pick and roll or isolation and the idea of fouling someone hard coming down the lane is gone. Watching Janes Harden is the pinnacle of bad and boring basketball to me. I’d rather watch a high school game than watch him jack up 40 shots in iso play while traveling and getting phantom fouls all game long.
Hardens step back is almost always 3 to 5 steps. So yeah that's really annoying.
Theres a definite genius in how he plays from an efficiency standpoint but he has literally stripped all spontaneity and creativity out of his game.
It's the same 3 things every time.
Watching great players spontaneously create plays in the moment is the most entertaining part of basketball and Harden is the antithesis of that.
anytime someone says the NBA is a bunch of guys going one on one I know they haven't watched in a long time.
Post moves to go along with three-point shooting capability is not unique anymore. At all.You are right, but who is to say Garza isn't the next step in the evolution? Not predicting it but these things can be hard to predict. He presents a very unique blend of talent with potential 3 point shooting to go along with post moves. Defense will always be his biggest challenge, but I wonder if his game doesn't have a place.